missing i
This commit is contained in:
parent
774a5a4331
commit
4d0e901571
@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ The regularized solutions $\reps{p,s}{\GW}$ are then obtained by solving the fol
|
|||||||
\eps{p}{\HF} + \rSigC{p}(\omega;\eta) - \omega = 0
|
\eps{p}{\HF} + \rSigC{p}(\omega;\eta) - \omega = 0
|
||||||
\end{equation}
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The most common and well-established way of regularizing $\Sigma$ is via the simple regularizer $f_\eta(\Delta) = (\Delta \pm \eta)^{-1}$, a strategy somehow related to the imaginary shift used in multiconfigurational perturbation theory. \cite{Forsberg_1997}
|
The most common and well-established way of regularizing $\Sigma$ is via the simple regularizer $f_\eta(\Delta) = (\Delta \pm \ii \eta)^{-1}$, a strategy somehow related to the imaginary shift used in multiconfigurational perturbation theory. \cite{Forsberg_1997}
|
||||||
Other choices are legitimate like the regularizers considered by Head-Gordon and coworkers within orbital-optimized second-order M{\o}ller-Plesset theory. \cite{Lee_2018a,Shee_2021}
|
Other choices are legitimate like the regularizers considered by Head-Gordon and coworkers within orbital-optimized second-order M{\o}ller-Plesset theory. \cite{Lee_2018a,Shee_2021}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Our investigations have shown that the following regularizer
|
Our investigations have shown that the following regularizer
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user