From 4d0e901571f3980834c277da1e9feb27683cdea3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pierre-Francois Loos Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 10:48:58 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] missing i --- Manuscript/ufGW.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Manuscript/ufGW.tex b/Manuscript/ufGW.tex index 9f51397..346081b 100644 --- a/Manuscript/ufGW.tex +++ b/Manuscript/ufGW.tex @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ The regularized solutions $\reps{p,s}{\GW}$ are then obtained by solving the fol \eps{p}{\HF} + \rSigC{p}(\omega;\eta) - \omega = 0 \end{equation} -The most common and well-established way of regularizing $\Sigma$ is via the simple regularizer $f_\eta(\Delta) = (\Delta \pm \eta)^{-1}$, a strategy somehow related to the imaginary shift used in multiconfigurational perturbation theory. \cite{Forsberg_1997} +The most common and well-established way of regularizing $\Sigma$ is via the simple regularizer $f_\eta(\Delta) = (\Delta \pm \ii \eta)^{-1}$, a strategy somehow related to the imaginary shift used in multiconfigurational perturbation theory. \cite{Forsberg_1997} Other choices are legitimate like the regularizers considered by Head-Gordon and coworkers within orbital-optimized second-order M{\o}ller-Plesset theory. \cite{Lee_2018a,Shee_2021} Our investigations have shown that the following regularizer