CO graphs
This commit is contained in:
parent
c94a9082bc
commit
e94e1bf1d1
Binary file not shown.
BIN
Manuscript/CO.pdf
Normal file
BIN
Manuscript/CO.pdf
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
@ -573,9 +573,9 @@ However, these results also clearly evidence that special care has to be taken f
|
||||
\\
|
||||
\\
|
||||
Carbon monoxide & $1\,^{1}\Sigma^+ \ra 1\,^{1}\Pi$ & Val. & 8.48\fnm[1] & 0.09 & 0.01 & 0.02
|
||||
& 0.05 & 0.00 &
|
||||
& 0.07 & 0.01 &
|
||||
& 0.07 & 0.00 &
|
||||
& 0.05 & 0.00 & 0.00
|
||||
& 0.07 & 0.01 & 0.02
|
||||
& 0.07 & 0.00 & 0.02
|
||||
\\
|
||||
\\
|
||||
Ethylene & $1\,^{1}A_{1g} \ra 1\,^{1}B_{3u}$ & Ryd. & 7.43\fnm[3] & -0.12 & -0.04 &
|
||||
@ -594,17 +594,17 @@ However, these results also clearly evidence that special care has to be taken f
|
||||
& 0.00 & 0.01 &
|
||||
\\
|
||||
& $1\,^{1}A_{1g} \ra 1\,^{3}B_{1u}$ & Val. & 4.54\fnm[3] & 0.01 & 0.00 &
|
||||
& 0.07 & 0.03 &
|
||||
& 0.10 & 0.04 &
|
||||
& 0.05 & 0.03 &
|
||||
& 0.08 & 0.04 &
|
||||
& 0.07 & 0.04 &
|
||||
\\
|
||||
& $1\,^{1}A_{1g} \ra 1\,^{3}B_{3u}$ & Val. & 7.28\fnm[4] & -0.12 & -0.04 &
|
||||
& -0.03 & 0.00 &
|
||||
& -0.04 & 0.00 &
|
||||
& 0.00 & 0.00 &
|
||||
& 0.00 & 0.02 &
|
||||
\\
|
||||
& $1\,^{1}A_{1g} \ra 1\,^{3}B_{1g}$ & Val. & 8.00\fnm[4] & -0.07 & -0.01 &
|
||||
& 0.01 & 0.03 &
|
||||
& 0.00 & 0.03 &
|
||||
& 0.04 & 0.03 &
|
||||
& 0.05 & 0.04 &
|
||||
\\
|
||||
@ -680,11 +680,11 @@ To do so, we consider the ground state (${}^{1}\Sigma^+$) of carbon monoxide as
|
||||
The values of the vertical excitation energies obtained for various methods and basis sets are reported in Table \ref{tab:Mol}.
|
||||
Figure \ref{fig:CO} represents $\rsmu{}{}(\br{})$ for these two electronic states computed with the AVDZ, AVTZ and AVQZ basis sets.
|
||||
|
||||
%%% FIG 3 %%%
|
||||
%%% FIG 4 %%%
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{CO}
|
||||
\caption{$\rsmu{}{\Bas}(z)$ along the molecular axis ($z$) for the ground state ${}^{1}\Sigma^+$ and first singlet excited state ${}^{1}\Pi$ of \ce{CO} for various basis sets $\Bas$.
|
||||
The carbon and oxygen nuclei are located at $z=-1.249$ and $z=0.893$ bohr, respectively.}
|
||||
\caption{$\rsmu{}{\Bas}(z)$ along the molecular axis ($z$) for the ground state ${}^{1}\Sigma^+$ (black curve) and first singlet excited state ${}^{1}\Pi$ (red curve) of \ce{CO} for various basis sets $\Bas$.
|
||||
The carbon and oxygen nuclei are located at $z=-1.249$ and $z=0.893$ bohr, respectively, and are represented by the thin black lines.}
|
||||
\label{fig:CO}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
%%% %%% %%%
|
||||
@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ An interesting point here is that one really needs the PBEot to get chemically-a
|
||||
We believe that the present result is a direct consequence of the multireference character of the \ce{C2} molecule.
|
||||
In other words, the UEG on-top density used in the LDA and PBE functionals (see Sec.~\ref{sec:func}) is a particularly bad approximation of the true on-top density.
|
||||
|
||||
%%% FIG 4 %%%
|
||||
%%% FIG 5 %%%
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{C2}
|
||||
\caption{Error in vertical excitation energies $\Eabs$ (in eV) for two doubly-excited states of the carbon dimer for various basis sets and methods.
|
||||
@ -721,9 +721,10 @@ We refer the interested reader to the work of Feller et al.\cite{FelPetDav-JCP-1
|
||||
In the present context, ethylene is a particularly interesting system as it contains a mixture of valence and Rydberg excited states.
|
||||
Our basis set corrected vertical excitation energies are gathered in Table \ref{tab:Mol} and depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:C2H4}.
|
||||
Except for one particular excitation (the lowest singlet-triplet excitation $1\,^{1}A_{1g} \ra 1\,^{3}B_{1u}$), the exFCI+PBEot/AVDZ excitation energies are chemically accurate and the errors drop further when one goes to the triple-$\zeta$ basis.
|
||||
%(Note that one cannot afford exFCI/AVQZ calculations for ethylene.)
|
||||
Consistently with the previous examples, the LDA and PBE functionals are slightly less accurate, although they still correct the excitation energies in the right direction.
|
||||
|
||||
%%% FIG 5 %%%
|
||||
%%% FIG 6 %%%
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{C2H4}
|
||||
\caption{Error in vertical excitation energies $\Eabs$ (in eV) of ethylene for various basis sets and methods.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user