diff --git a/Manuscript/C2H4.pdf b/Manuscript/C2H4.pdf
index 81271f1..d4366ef 100644
Binary files a/Manuscript/C2H4.pdf and b/Manuscript/C2H4.pdf differ
diff --git a/Manuscript/CO.pdf b/Manuscript/CO.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..49c1756
Binary files /dev/null and b/Manuscript/CO.pdf differ
diff --git a/Manuscript/Ex-srDFT.tex b/Manuscript/Ex-srDFT.tex
index 24c5c84..d724d85 100644
--- a/Manuscript/Ex-srDFT.tex
+++ b/Manuscript/Ex-srDFT.tex
@@ -573,9 +573,9 @@ However, these results also clearly evidence that special care has to be taken f
 	\\
 	\\
 	Carbon monoxide	&	$1\,^{1}\Sigma^+ \ra 1\,^{1}\Pi$		&	Val.	&	8.48\fnm[1]		&	0.09	&	0.01	&	0.02
-																								&	0.05	&	0.00	&	
-																								&	0.07	&	0.01	&	
-																								&	0.07	&	0.00	&	
+																								&	0.05	&	0.00	&	0.00
+																								&	0.07	&	0.01	&	0.02
+																								&	0.07	&	0.00	&	0.02
 	\\
 	\\
 	Ethylene	&	$1\,^{1}A_{1g} \ra 1\,^{1}B_{3u}$		&	Ryd.	&	7.43\fnm[3]	&	-0.12	&	-0.04	&	
@@ -594,17 +594,17 @@ However, these results also clearly evidence that special care has to be taken f
 																					&	0.00	&	0.01	&	
 	\\
 				&	$1\,^{1}A_{1g} \ra 1\,^{3}B_{1u}$		&	Val.	&	4.54\fnm[3]	&	0.01	&	0.00	&	
-																					&	0.07	&	0.03	&	
-																					&	0.10	&	0.04	&	
+																					&	0.05	&	0.03	&	
 																					&	0.08	&	0.04	&	
+																					&	0.07	&	0.04	&	
 	\\
 				&	$1\,^{1}A_{1g} \ra 1\,^{3}B_{3u}$		&	Val.	&	7.28\fnm[4]	&	-0.12	&	-0.04	&	
-																					&	-0.03	&	0.00	&	
+																					&	-0.04	&	0.00	&	
 																					&	0.00	&	0.00	&	
 																					&	0.00	&	0.02	&	
 	\\
 				&	$1\,^{1}A_{1g} \ra 1\,^{3}B_{1g}$		&	Val.	&	8.00\fnm[4]	&	-0.07	&	-0.01	&	
-																					&	0.01	&	0.03	&	
+																					&	0.00	&	0.03	&	
 																					&	0.04	&	0.03	&	
 																					&	0.05	&	0.04	&	
 	\\
@@ -680,11 +680,11 @@ To do so, we consider the ground state (${}^{1}\Sigma^+$) of carbon monoxide as
 The values of the vertical excitation energies obtained for various methods and basis sets are reported in Table \ref{tab:Mol}.
 Figure \ref{fig:CO} represents $\rsmu{}{}(\br{})$ for these two electronic states computed with the AVDZ, AVTZ and AVQZ basis sets.
 
-%%% FIG 3 %%%
+%%% FIG 4 %%%
 \begin{figure}
 	\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{CO}
-	\caption{$\rsmu{}{\Bas}(z)$ along the molecular axis ($z$) for the ground state ${}^{1}\Sigma^+$ and first singlet excited state ${}^{1}\Pi$ of \ce{CO} for various basis sets $\Bas$.
-	The carbon and oxygen nuclei are located at $z=-1.249$ and $z=0.893$ bohr, respectively.}
+	\caption{$\rsmu{}{\Bas}(z)$ along the molecular axis ($z$) for the ground state ${}^{1}\Sigma^+$ (black curve) and first singlet excited state ${}^{1}\Pi$ (red curve) of \ce{CO} for various basis sets $\Bas$.
+	The carbon and oxygen nuclei are located at $z=-1.249$ and $z=0.893$ bohr, respectively, and are represented by the thin black lines.}
 	\label{fig:CO}
 \end{figure}
 %%% %%% %%%
@@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ An interesting point here is that one really needs the PBEot to get chemically-a
 We believe that the present result is a direct consequence of the multireference character of the \ce{C2} molecule.
 In other words, the UEG on-top density used in the LDA and PBE functionals (see Sec.~\ref{sec:func}) is a particularly bad approximation of the true on-top density.
 
-%%% FIG 4 %%%
+%%% FIG 5 %%%
 \begin{figure}
 	\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{C2}
 	\caption{Error in vertical excitation energies $\Eabs$ (in eV) for two doubly-excited states of the carbon dimer for various basis sets and methods.
@@ -721,9 +721,10 @@ We refer the interested reader to the work of Feller et al.\cite{FelPetDav-JCP-1
 In the present context, ethylene is a particularly interesting system as it contains a mixture of valence and Rydberg excited states. 
 Our basis set corrected vertical excitation energies are gathered in Table \ref{tab:Mol} and depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:C2H4}.
 Except for one particular excitation (the lowest singlet-triplet excitation $1\,^{1}A_{1g} \ra 1\,^{3}B_{1u}$), the exFCI+PBEot/AVDZ excitation energies are chemically accurate and the errors drop further when one goes to the triple-$\zeta$ basis.
+%(Note that one cannot afford exFCI/AVQZ calculations for ethylene.)
 Consistently with the previous examples, the LDA and PBE functionals are slightly less accurate, although they still correct the excitation energies in the right direction.
 
-%%% FIG 5 %%%
+%%% FIG 6 %%%
 \begin{figure}
 	\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{C2H4}
 	\caption{Error in vertical excitation energies $\Eabs$ (in eV) of ethylene for various basis sets and methods.