mu
This commit is contained in:
parent
faf9ead266
commit
c94a9082bc
@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ Except for methylene for which FCI/TZVP geometries have been taken from Ref.~\on
|
||||
For the sake of completeness, they are also reported in the {\SI}.
|
||||
Frozen-core calculations are systematically performed and defined as such: a \ce{He} core is frozen from \ce{Li} to \ce{Ne}, while a \ce{Ne} core is frozen from \ce{Na} to \ce{Ar}.
|
||||
The frozen-core density-based correction is used consistently with the frozen-core approximation in WFT methods.
|
||||
We refer the interested reader to Ref.~\onlinecite{LooPraSceTouGin-JPCL-19} for an explicit derivation of the equations associated with the frozen-core version of the present density-based basis set correction.
|
||||
We refer the reader to Ref.~\onlinecite{LooPraSceTouGin-JPCL-19} for an explicit derivation of the equations associated with the frozen-core version of the present density-based basis set correction.
|
||||
Compared to the exFCI calculations performed to compute energies and densities, the basis set correction represents, in any case, a marginal computational cost.
|
||||
In the following, we employ the AVXZ shorthand notations for Dunning's aug-cc-pVXZ basis sets.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -675,14 +675,15 @@ However, these results also clearly evidence that special care has to be taken f
|
||||
\label{sec:CO}
|
||||
%=======================
|
||||
|
||||
\titou{It is interesting to have a look at $\rsmu{}{}(\br{})$ for the ground and excited states.
|
||||
To do so, we consider the first singlet excited state of carbon monoxide (vertical excitation energies are reported in Table \ref{tab:Mol}).
|
||||
Figure \ref{fig:mu} represent $\rsmu{}{}(\br{})$ for the ground and excited states for the AVDZ, AVTZ and AVQZ basis sets.}
|
||||
It is interesting to study the behavior of $\rsmu{}{\Bas}(\br{})$ for different states as the basis set incompleteness error is obviously state specific.
|
||||
To do so, we consider the ground state (${}^{1}\Sigma^+$) of carbon monoxide as well as its lowest singlet excited state (${}^{1}\Pi$).
|
||||
The values of the vertical excitation energies obtained for various methods and basis sets are reported in Table \ref{tab:Mol}.
|
||||
Figure \ref{fig:CO} represents $\rsmu{}{}(\br{})$ for these two electronic states computed with the AVDZ, AVTZ and AVQZ basis sets.
|
||||
|
||||
%%% FIG 3 %%%
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{CO}
|
||||
\caption{$\rsmu{}{\Bas}(z)$ along the molecular axis ($z$) for the ground state and first singlet excited state of \ce{CO} for various basis sets $\Bas$.
|
||||
\caption{$\rsmu{}{\Bas}(z)$ along the molecular axis ($z$) for the ground state ${}^{1}\Sigma^+$ and first singlet excited state ${}^{1}\Pi$ of \ce{CO} for various basis sets $\Bas$.
|
||||
The carbon and oxygen nuclei are located at $z=-1.249$ and $z=0.893$ bohr, respectively.}
|
||||
\label{fig:CO}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
@ -736,7 +737,7 @@ Consistently with the previous examples, the LDA and PBE functionals are slightl
|
||||
\section{Conclusion}
|
||||
\label{sec:ccl}
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
We have shown that, by employing the recently proposed density-based basis set correction developed by some of the authors, \cite{GinPraFerAssSavTou-JCP-18} one can obtain chemically-accurate excitation energies with typically augmented double-$\zeta$ basis sets.
|
||||
We have shown that, by employing the recently proposed density-based basis set correction developed by some of the authors, \cite{GinPraFerAssSavTou-JCP-18} one can obtain, using sCI methods, chemically-accurate excitation energies with typically augmented double-$\zeta$ basis sets.
|
||||
This nicely complements our recent investigation on ground-state properties, \cite{LooPraSceTouGin-JPCL-19} which has evidenced that one recovers quintuple-$\zeta$ quality atomization and correlation energies with triple-$\zeta$ basis sets.
|
||||
The present study clearly shows that, for very diffuse excited states, the present correction relying on short-range correlation functionals from RS-DFT might not be enough to catch the radial incompleteness of the one-electron basis set.
|
||||
Also, in the case of multireference systems, we have evidenced that the PBEot functional is more appropriate than the LDA and PBE functionals relying on the UEG on-top density.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user