Manu: saving work
This commit is contained in:
parent
34607cf900
commit
04211afeae
@ -97,6 +97,7 @@
|
|||||||
\newcommand{\bmg}{\bm{\Gamma}} % orbital rotation vector
|
\newcommand{\bmg}{\bm{\Gamma}} % orbital rotation vector
|
||||||
\newcommand{\bfx}{\bf{x}}
|
\newcommand{\bfx}{\bf{x}}
|
||||||
\newcommand{\bfr}{\bf{r}}
|
\newcommand{\bfr}{\bf{r}}
|
||||||
|
\DeclareMathOperator*{\argmin}{arg\,min}
|
||||||
%%%%
|
%%%%
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{document}
|
\begin{document}
|
||||||
@ -636,7 +637,16 @@ functional where (i) the ghost-interaction correction functional $\overline{E}^{
|
|||||||
Hx}[n]$ in
|
Hx}[n]$ in
|
||||||
Eq.~(\ref{eq:exact_GIC}) is
|
Eq.~(\ref{eq:exact_GIC}) is
|
||||||
neglected, for simplicity, and (ii) the weight-dependent correlation
|
neglected, for simplicity, and (ii) the weight-dependent correlation
|
||||||
energy is descrive at the local density level of approximation. More
|
energy is described at the local density level of approximation.
|
||||||
|
At this
|
||||||
|
level of approximation, the two correlation functionals $\overline{E}^{{\bw}}_{\rm
|
||||||
|
c}[n]$ and ${E}^{{\bw}}_{\rm
|
||||||
|
c}[n]$ are actually identical and can be expressed as
|
||||||
|
\beq
|
||||||
|
{E}^{{\bw}}_{\rm
|
||||||
|
c}[n]=\int d\br\;n(\br)\epsilon_{c}^{\bw}(n(\br)).
|
||||||
|
\eeq
|
||||||
|
More
|
||||||
details about the construction of such a functional will be given in the
|
details about the construction of such a functional will be given in the
|
||||||
following. In order to remove ghost interactions from the variational energy
|
following. In order to remove ghost interactions from the variational energy
|
||||||
expression used in the first step, we then employ the (in-principle-exact)
|
expression used in the first step, we then employ the (in-principle-exact)
|
||||||
@ -645,6 +655,36 @@ step, the response of the individual density matrices to weight
|
|||||||
variations (last term on the right-hand side of
|
variations (last term on the right-hand side of
|
||||||
Eq.~(\ref{eq:exact_ind_ener_OEP-like})) is neglected. The complete GIC
|
Eq.~(\ref{eq:exact_ind_ener_OEP-like})) is neglected. The complete GIC
|
||||||
procedure can be summarized as follows,
|
procedure can be summarized as follows,
|
||||||
|
\beq
|
||||||
|
{\bmg}^{\bw}\approx\argmin_{{\bm\gamma}^{\bw}}
|
||||||
|
\Big\{
|
||||||
|
{\rm
|
||||||
|
Tr}\left[{\bm \gamma}^{{\bw}}{\bm h}\right]+W_{\rm
|
||||||
|
HF}\left[{\bm\gamma}^{\bw}\right]
|
||||||
|
+
|
||||||
|
{E}^{{\bw}}_{\rm
|
||||||
|
c}\left[n_{\bm\gamma^{\bw}}\right]
|
||||||
|
%+E^{{\bw}}_{\rm c}\left[n_{\hat{\Gamma}^{{\bw}}}\right]
|
||||||
|
\Big\},
|
||||||
|
\nonumber\\
|
||||||
|
\eeq
|
||||||
|
and
|
||||||
|
\beq
|
||||||
|
E^{(I)}&&\approx{\rm
|
||||||
|
Tr}\left[{\bmg}^{(I)}{\bm h}\right]
|
||||||
|
+\frac{1}{2} \Tr(\bmg^{(I)} \, \bG \,
|
||||||
|
\bmg^{(I)})
|
||||||
|
\nonumber\\
|
||||||
|
&&+{E}^{{\bw}}_{\rm
|
||||||
|
c}\left[n_{\bmg^{\bw}}\right]
|
||||||
|
+\int d\br\,\dfrac{\delta {E}^{{\bw}}_{\rm
|
||||||
|
c}\left[n_{\bmg^{\bw}}\right]}{\delta
|
||||||
|
n({\br})}\left(n_{\bmg^{(I)}}(\br)-n_{\bmg^{\bw}}(\br)\right)
|
||||||
|
\nonumber\\
|
||||||
|
&&+\sum_{K>0}\left(\delta_{IK}-w_K\right)\left. \dfrac{\partial {E}^{{\bw}}_{\rm
|
||||||
|
c}\left[n\right]}{\partial w_K}\right|_{n=n_{\bmg^{\bw}}}
|
||||||
|
.
|
||||||
|
\eeq
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\alert{Secs. \ref{sec:KS-eDFT}-\ref{sec:E_I} should maybe be moved to an appendix or merged
|
\alert{Secs. \ref{sec:KS-eDFT}-\ref{sec:E_I} should maybe be moved to an appendix or merged
|
||||||
with the theory section (?)}
|
with the theory section (?)}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user