dsanchez/spectre-meltdown-checker
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/speed47/spectre-meltdown-checker synced 2024-11-07 06:33:38 +01:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

Fix typo: 'RBS filling' => 'RSB filling' (#237)

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Karsten Weiss 2018-08-18 12:05:17 +02:00 committed by Stéphane Lesimple
parent 0009c0d473
commit afb36c519d
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
spectre-meltdown-checker.sh
View File

@ -2795,7 +2795,7 @@ check_variant2_linux()
if [ "$pvulnstatus_last_cve" != "$cve" ]; then
# explain what's needed for this CPU
if is_vulnerable_to_empty_rsb; then
pvulnstatus $cve VULN "IBRS+IBPB or retpoline+IBPB+RBS filling, is needed to mitigate the vulnerability"
pvulnstatus $cve VULN "IBRS+IBPB or retpoline+IBPB+RSB filling, is needed to mitigate the vulnerability"
explain "To mitigate this vulnerability, you need either IBRS + IBPB, both requiring hardware support from your CPU microcode in addition to kernel support, or a kernel compiled with retpoline and IBPB, with retpoline requiring a retpoline-aware compiler (re-run this script with -v to know if your version of gcc is retpoline-aware) and IBPB requiring hardware support from your CPU microcode. You also need a recent-enough kernel that supports RSB filling if you plan to use retpoline. For Skylake+ CPUs, the IBRS + IBPB approach is generally preferred as it guarantees complete protection, and the performance impact is not as high as with older CPUs in comparison with retpoline. More information about how to enable the missing bits for those two possible mitigations on your system follow. You only need to take one of the two approaches."
elif is_zen_cpu; then
pvulnstatus $cve VULN "retpoline+IBPB is needed to mitigate the vulnerability"