1
0
mirror of https://github.com/TREX-CoE/qmc-lttc.git synced 2024-12-21 11:53:58 +01:00

up to uniform prob

This commit is contained in:
filippi-claudia 2021-01-31 09:39:10 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent c55fba639c
commit 64cf028f7b
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23

58
QMC.org
View File

@ -83,27 +83,27 @@
For few dimensions, one can easily compute $E$ by evaluating the integrals on a grid but, for a high number of dimensions, one can resort to Monte Carlo techniques to compute $E$. For few dimensions, one can easily compute $E$ by evaluating the integrals on a grid but, for a high number of dimensions, one can resort to Monte Carlo techniques to compute $E$.
To this aim, recall that the probabilistic /expected value/ of an arbitrary function $f(x)$ To this aim, recall that the probabilistic /expected value/ of an arbitrary function $f(x)$
with respect to a probability density function $p(x)$ is given by with respect to a probability density function $P(x)$ is given by
$$ \langle f \rangle_p = \int_{-\infty}^\infty p(x)\, f(x)\,dx, $$ $$ \langle f \rangle_p = \int_{-\infty}^\infty P(x)\, f(x)\,dx, $$
where a probability density function $p(x)$ is non-negative where a probability density function $p(x)$ is non-negative
and integrates to one: and integrates to one:
$$ \int_{-\infty}^\infty p(x)\,dx = 1. $$ $$ \int_{-\infty}^\infty P(x)\,dx = 1. $$
Similarly, we can view the the energy of a system, $E$, as the expected value of the local energy with respect to Similarly, we can view the the energy of a system, $E$, as the expected value of the local energy with respect to
a probability density $p(\mathbf{r}}$ defined in 3$N$ dimensions: a probability density $P(\mathbf{r}}$ defined in 3$N$ dimensions:
$$ E = \int E_L(\mathbf{r}) p(\mathbf{r})\,d\mathbf{r}} \equiv \langle E_L \rangle_{\Psi^2}\,, $$ $$ E = \int E_L(\mathbf{r}) P(\mathbf{r})\,d\mathbf{r}} \equiv \langle E_L \rangle_{\Psi^2}\,, $$
where the probability density is given by the square of the wave function: where the probability density is given by the square of the wave function:
$$ p(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{|Psi(\mathbf{r}|^2){\int \left |\Psi(\mathbf{r})|^2 d\mathbf{r}}\,. $$ $$ P(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{|Psi(\mathbf{r}|^2){\int \left |\Psi(\mathbf{r})|^2 d\mathbf{r}}\,. $$
If we can sample configurations $\{\mathbf{r}\}$ distributed as $p$, we can estimate $E$ as the average of the local energy computed over these configurations: If we can sample $N_{\rm MC}$ configurations $\{\mathbf{r}\}$ distributed as $p$, we can estimate $E$ as the average of the local energy computed over these configurations:
$$ E \approx \frac{1}{M} \sum_{i=1}^M E_L(\mathbf{r}_i} \,. $$ E \approx \frac{1}{N_{\rm MC}} \sum_{i=1}^{N_{\rm MC}} E_L(\mathbf{r}_i} \,.
* Numerical evaluation of the energy of the hydrogen atom * Numerical evaluation of the energy of the hydrogen atom
@ -971,9 +971,9 @@ gfortran hydrogen.f90 variance_hydrogen.f90 -o variance_hydrogen
Numerical integration with deterministic methods is very efficient Numerical integration with deterministic methods is very efficient
in low dimensions. When the number of dimensions becomes large, in low dimensions. When the number of dimensions becomes large,
instead of computing the average energy as a numerical integration instead of computing the average energy as a numerical integration
on a grid, it is usually more efficient to do a Monte Carlo sampling. on a grid, it is usually more efficient to use Monte Carlo sampling.
Moreover, a Monte Carlo sampling will alow us to remove the bias due Moreover, Monte Carlo sampling will alow us to remove the bias due
to the discretization of space, and compute a statistical confidence to the discretization of space, and compute a statistical confidence
interval. interval.
@ -986,7 +986,7 @@ gfortran hydrogen.f90 variance_hydrogen.f90 -o variance_hydrogen
To compute the statistical error, you need to perform $M$ To compute the statistical error, you need to perform $M$
independent Monte Carlo calculations. You will obtain $M$ different independent Monte Carlo calculations. You will obtain $M$ different
estimates of the energy, which are expected to have a Gaussian estimates of the energy, which are expected to have a Gaussian
distribution according to the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_limit_theorem][Central Limit Theorem]]. distribution for large $M$, according to the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_limit_theorem][Central Limit Theorem]].
The estimate of the energy is The estimate of the energy is
@ -1087,10 +1087,28 @@ end subroutine ave_error
:header-args:f90: :tangle qmc_uniform.f90 :header-args:f90: :tangle qmc_uniform.f90
:END: :END:
We will now do our first Monte Carlo calculation to compute the We will now perform our first Monte Carlo calculation to compute the
energy of the hydrogen atom. energy of the hydrogen atom.
At every Monte Carlo iteration: Consider again the expression of the energy
\begin{eqnarray*}
E & = & \frac{\int E_L(\mathbf{r})\left[\Psi(\mathbf{r})\right]^2\,d\mathbf{r}}{\int \left[\Psi(\mathbf{r}) \right]^2 d\mathbf{r}}\,.
\end{eqnarray*}
Clearly, the square of the wave function is a good choice of probability density to sample but we will start with something simpler and rewrite the energy as
\begin{eqnarray*}
E & = & \frac{\int E_L(\mathbf{r})\frac{|\Psi(\mathbf{r})|^2}{p(\mathbf{r})}p(\mathbf{r})\, \,d\mathbf{r}}{\int \frac{|\Psi(\mathbf{r})|^2 }{p(\mathbf{r})}p(\mathbf{r})d\mathbf{r}}\,.
\end{eqnarray*}
Here, we will sample a uniform probability $p(\mathbf{r})$ in a cube of volume $L^3$ centered at the origin:
$$ p(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{1}{L^3}\,, $$
and zero outside the cube.
One Monte Carlo run will consist of $N_{\rm MC}$ Monte Carlo iterations. At every Monte Carlo iteration:
- Draw a random point $\mathbf{r}_i$ in the box $(-5,-5,-5) \le - Draw a random point $\mathbf{r}_i$ in the box $(-5,-5,-5) \le
(x,y,z) \le (5,5,5)$ (x,y,z) \le (5,5,5)$
@ -1099,9 +1117,8 @@ end subroutine ave_error
- Compute $[\Psi(\mathbf{r}_i)]^2 \times E_L(\mathbf{r}_i)$, and accumulate the - Compute $[\Psi(\mathbf{r}_i)]^2 \times E_L(\mathbf{r}_i)$, and accumulate the
result in a variable =energy= result in a variable =energy=
One Monte Carlo run will consist of $N$ Monte Carlo iterations. Once all the Once all the iterations have been computed, the run returns the average energy
iterations have been computed, the run returns the average energy $\bar{E}_k$ over the $N_{\rm MC}$ iterations of the run.
$\bar{E}_k$ over the $N$ iterations of the run.
To compute the statistical error, perform $M$ independent runs. The To compute the statistical error, perform $M$ independent runs. The
final estimate of the energy will be the average over the final estimate of the energy will be the average over the
@ -1298,17 +1315,16 @@ gfortran hydrogen.f90 qmc_stats.f90 qmc_uniform.f90 -o qmc_uniform
We will now use the square of the wave function to sample random We will now use the square of the wave function to sample random
points distributed with the probability density points distributed with the probability density
\[ \[
P(\mathbf{r}) = \left[\Psi(\mathbf{r})\right]^2 P(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{|Psi(\mathbf{r}|^2){\int \left |\Psi(\mathbf{r})|^2 d\mathbf{r}}
\] \]
The expression of the average energy is now simplified as the average of The expression of the average energy is now simplified as the average of
the local energies, since the weights are taken care of by the the local energies, since the weights are taken care of by the
sampling : sampling:
$$ $$
E \approx \frac{1}{M}\sum_{i=1}^M E_L(\mathbf{r}_i) E \approx \frac{1}{N_{\rm MC}}\sum_{i=1}^{N_{\rm MC} E_L(\mathbf{r}_i)
$$ $$
To sample a chosen probability density, an efficient method is the To sample a chosen probability density, an efficient method is the
[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolis%E2%80%93Hastings_algorithm][Metropolis-Hastings sampling algorithm]]. Starting from a random [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolis%E2%80%93Hastings_algorithm][Metropolis-Hastings sampling algorithm]]. Starting from a random