2021-01-26 07:26:54 +01:00
|
|
|
*.o
|
2021-02-04 11:39:00 +01:00
|
|
|
*.mod
|
2021-04-01 13:49:53 +02:00
|
|
|
*.dbg
|
2021-04-09 17:21:31 +02:00
|
|
|
*.cmdx
|
|
|
|
|
*.cmod
|
|
|
|
|
*.ilm
|
|
|
|
|
*.stb
|
2021-02-12 12:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
.vscode
|
The algorithm now works for the following 4x4 example with 2 updates:
S = [1,0,1,-1; 0,1,1,0; -1,0,-1,0; 1,1,1,1]
S_inv = [1,-1,1,1; 1,0,2,1; -1,1,-2,-1; -1,0,-1,0]
u1 = [0,-2,0,0]
u2 = [0,-1,0,0]
upd_idx = [2,4]
To go from Maponi's examples where the number of updates is always equal
to the the dimension of the matrix, and the decomposition is always
diagonal, to cases with a non-diagonal decomposition and a number of
updates unequal to its size, the following changed needed to be made:
* in the calculation of the {y0k} an extra inner for-loop needs to be
added to make it a full matrix-vector multiplication due to the fact
that A0 is not a diagonal matrix
* in some places the use of the update-order vector p needs
the be replaced with that of upd_idx to make sure the correct
component of the ylk is selected and the proper rank-1 matrices are
constructed
* when a matrix is passed from Fortran to C++ with 2D adressing, it is
passed in colum-major order. The passed matrix needs to be transposed
before passing to C++. Doing this inside the algorithm will break
compatibility with called from C/C++.
2021-02-21 18:28:08 +01:00
|
|
|
Slater*
|
2021-02-18 19:43:20 +01:00
|
|
|
Updates*
|
2021-04-01 13:49:53 +02:00
|
|
|
datasets/dataset.*
|
2021-02-27 12:25:55 +01:00
|
|
|
bin/
|
2021-04-29 23:41:23 +02:00
|
|
|
*.vfcrun.hd5
|
|
|
|
|
*.vfcraw.hd5
|