comment on complex adiabatic connection, added figure legend
This commit is contained in:
parent
35e5dbbc08
commit
dc167624d1
@ -499,6 +499,28 @@ and the ground-state RHF energy (Fig.~\ref{fig:HF_real})
|
||||
However, in the strongly correlated regime (large $U$), the closed-shell restriction on the orbitals prevents RHF from
|
||||
correctly modelling the physics of the system with the two electrons on opposing sites.
|
||||
|
||||
%%% FIG 3 (?) %%%
|
||||
% Analytic Continuation of HF
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
\begin{figure*}[t]
|
||||
\begin{subfigure}{0.49\textwidth}
|
||||
\includegraphics[height=0.65\textwidth,trim={0pt 0pt 0pt -35pt},clip]{HF_cplx_angle}
|
||||
\subcaption{\label{subfig:UHF_cplx_angle}}
|
||||
\end{subfigure}
|
||||
\begin{subfigure}{0.49\textwidth}
|
||||
\includegraphics[height=0.65\textwidth]{HF_cplx_energy}
|
||||
\subcaption{\label{subfig:UHF_cplx_energy}}
|
||||
\end{subfigure}
|
||||
\caption{%
|
||||
\hugh{(\subref{subfig:UHF_cplx_angle}) Real component of the UHF angle $\ta^{\text{UHF}}$ for $\lambda \in \bbC$.
|
||||
Symmetry-broken solutions correspond to an individual sheets and become equivalent at the quasi-EP (black dot).
|
||||
The RHF solution is independent of $\lambda$, giving constant plane at $\pi/2$.
|
||||
(\subref{subfig:UHF_cplx_energy}) The corresponding HF energy surfaces show a non-analytic
|
||||
point at the quasi-exceptional point.}
|
||||
\label{fig:HF_cplx}}
|
||||
\end{figure*}
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
|
||||
As the on-site repulsion is increased from 0, the HF approximation reaches a critical value at $U=2t$ where a symmetry-broken
|
||||
UHF solution appears with a lower energy than the RHF one.
|
||||
This critical point is analogous to the infamous Coulson--Fischer point identified in the hydrogen dimer.\cite{Coulson_1949}
|
||||
@ -523,24 +545,6 @@ of the HF energy rather than a minimum.
|
||||
\subsection{Self-consistency as a perturbation} %OR {Complex adiabatic connection}
|
||||
%============================================================%
|
||||
|
||||
%%% FIG 3 (?) %%%
|
||||
% Analytic Continuation of HF
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
\begin{figure*}[t]
|
||||
\begin{subfigure}{0.49\textwidth}
|
||||
\includegraphics[height=0.65\textwidth,trim={0pt 0pt 0pt -30pt},clip]{HF_cplx_angle}
|
||||
\subcaption{\label{subfig:UHF_cplx_angle}}
|
||||
\end{subfigure}
|
||||
\begin{subfigure}{0.49\textwidth}
|
||||
\includegraphics[height=0.65\textwidth]{HF_cplx_energy}
|
||||
\subcaption{\label{subfig:UHF_cplx_energy}}
|
||||
\end{subfigure}
|
||||
\caption{%
|
||||
Analytic continuation of HF into the complex $\lambda$ plane.
|
||||
\label{fig:HF_cplx}}
|
||||
\end{figure*}
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
|
||||
% INTRODUCE PARAMETRISED FOCK HAMILTONIAN
|
||||
\hugh{The inherent non-linearity in the Fock eigenvalue problem arises from self-consistency
|
||||
in the HF approximation, and is usually solved through an iterative approach.\cite{SzaboBook}
|
||||
@ -559,6 +563,7 @@ in the Hubbard dimer directly mirror the energies shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:HF_real
|
||||
with coalesence points at
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\lambda_{\text{c}} = \pm \frac{2t}{U}.
|
||||
\label{eq:scaled_fock}
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
In contrast, when $\lambda$ becomes complex, the HF equations become non-Hermitian and
|
||||
each HF solutions can be analytically continued for all $\lambda$ values using
|
||||
@ -573,16 +578,27 @@ accurate representation for the true HF ground state at $\lambda = 1$.
|
||||
For example, in the Hubbard dimer with $U > 2t$, one finds $\lambda_{\text{c}} < 1$ and the symmetry-pure orbitals
|
||||
do not provide a good representation of the HF ground state.
|
||||
In contrast, $U < 2t$ yields $\lambda_{\text{c}} > 1$ and corresponds to
|
||||
the regime where the HF ground state is correctly represented by symmetry-pure orbitals.}
|
||||
the regime where the HF ground state is correctly represented by symmetry-pure orbitals.
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
% COMPLEX ADIABATIC CONNECTION
|
||||
\titou{In a recent paper, \cite{Burton_2019} using holomorphic Hartree-Fock (h-HF) \cite{Hiscock_2014,Burton_2018,Burton_2016} as an analytic continuation of conventional HF theory, we have demonstrated, on a simple model, that one can interconvert states of different symmetries and natures by following well-defined contours in the complex $\lambda$-plane, where $\lambda$ is the strength of the electron-electron interaction (see Fig.~\ref{fig:iAC}).
|
||||
In particular, by slowly varying $\lambda$ in a similar (yet different) manner to an adiabatic connection in density-functional theory, \cite{Langreth_1975,Gunnarsson_1976,Zhang_2004} one can ``morph'' a ground-state wave function into an excited-state wave function via a stationary path of HF solutions. \cite{Seidl_2018}
|
||||
In such a way, we could obtain a doubly-excited state wave function starting from the ground state wave function, a process which is not as easy as one might think. \cite{Gilbert_2008,Thom_2008,Shea_2018}
|
||||
One of the fundamental discovery we made was that Coulson-Fisher points (where multiple symmetry-broken solutions coalesce) play a central role and can be classified as \textit{quasi}-exceptional points, as the wave functions do not become self-orthogonal.
|
||||
The findings reported in Ref.~\onlinecite{Burton_2019} represent the very first study of non-Hermitian quantum mechanics for the exploration of multiple solutions at the HF level.
|
||||
It perfectly illustrates the deeper topology of electronic states revealed using a complex-scaled electron-electron interaction.
|
||||
Through the introduction of non-Hermiticity, we have provided a more general framework in which the complex and diverse characteristics of multiple solutions can be explored and understood.}
|
||||
\hugh{We have recently shown that the complex scaled Fock operator Eq.~\eqref{eq:scaled_fock}
|
||||
also allows states of different symmetries to be interconverted by following a well-defined
|
||||
contour in the complex $\lambda$-plane.\cite{Burton_2019}
|
||||
In particular, by slowly varying $\lambda$ in a similar (yet different) manner
|
||||
to an adiabatic connection in density-functional theory,\cite{Langreth_1975,Gunnarsson_1976,Zhang_2004}
|
||||
a ground-state wave function can be ``morphed'' into an excited-state wave function
|
||||
via a stationary path of HF solutions.
|
||||
This novel approach to identifying excited-state wave functions demonstrates the fundamental
|
||||
role of quasi-EPs in determining the behaviour of the HF approximation.}
|
||||
|
||||
%\titou{In a recent paper, \cite{Burton_2019} using holomorphic Hartree-Fock (h-HF) \cite{Hiscock_2014,Burton_2018,Burton_2016} as an analytic continuation of conventional HF theory, we have demonstrated, on a simple model, that one can interconvert states of different symmetries and natures by following well-defined contours in the complex $\lambda$-plane, where $\lambda$ is the strength of the electron-electron interaction (see Fig.~\ref{fig:iAC}).
|
||||
%In particular, by slowly varying $\lambda$ in a similar (yet different) manner to an adiabatic connection in density-functional theory, \cite{Langreth_1975,Gunnarsson_1976,Zhang_2004} one can ``morph'' a ground-state wave function into an excited-state wave function via a stationary path of HF solutions. \cite{Seidl_2018}
|
||||
%In such a way, we could obtain a doubly-excited state wave function starting from the ground state wave function, a process which is not as easy as one might think. \cite{Gilbert_2008,Thom_2008,Shea_2018}
|
||||
%One of the fundamental discovery we made was that Coulson-Fisher points (where multiple symmetry-broken solutions coalesce) play a central role and can be classified as \textit{quasi}-exceptional points, as the wave functions do not become self-orthogonal.
|
||||
%The findings reported in Ref.~\onlinecite{Burton_2019} represent the very first study of non-Hermitian quantum mechanics for the exploration of multiple solutions at the HF level.
|
||||
%It perfectly illustrates the deeper topology of electronic states revealed using a complex-scaled electron-electron interaction.
|
||||
%Through the introduction of non-Hermiticity, we have provided a more general framework in which the complex and diverse characteristics of multiple solutions can be explored and understood.}
|
||||
|
||||
%=====================================================%
|
||||
\subsection{M{\o}ller-Plesset perturbation theory}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user