add some graph

RapportStage/Rapport.bib

@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@
 	Date-Modified = {2019-01-22 22:33:30 +0100},
 	Keywords = {qmech},
 	Publisher = {McGraw-Hill},
-	Title = {Modern quantum chemistry},
+	Title = {Modern quantum chemistry: Introduction to advanced electronic structure},
 	Year = {1989},
 }
 

RapportStage/Rapport.tex

@@ -552,16 +552,28 @@ In this part, we will try to investigate how some parameters of $\bH(\lambda)$ i
 
 We will take the simple case of the M{\o}ller-Plesset partitioning with a restricted Hartree-Fock minimal basis set as our starting point for this analysis. \\
 
-Puis on rajoute les 3 autres partitionnements \\
+\begin{figure}[h!]
+    \centering
+    \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{RHFMiniBasRCV.pdf}
+    \caption{\centering }
+    \label{fig:RHFMiniBasRCV}
+\end{figure}
 
-Puis différence entre $Y_{l0}$ et $P_l(\cos(\theta))$ (CSF). Parler de la possibilité de la base strong coupling. \\
+Then we will compare the different partitioning using the same basis set. The \autoref{fig:RadiusPartitioning} shows the evolution of the radius of convergence in function of $R$ for the M{\o}ller-Plesset, the Epstein-Nesbet, the weak correlation and the strong coupling partitioning. We can see that
+
+\begin{figure}[h!]
+    \centering
+    \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{PartitioningRCV.pdf}
+    \caption{\centering }
+    \label{fig:RadiusPartitioning}
+\end{figure}
+
+Puis différence entre $Y_{l0}$ et $P_l(\cos(\theta))$ (CSF). + petit Parler de la possibilité de la base strong coupling avec la citation paola et les polynomes . \\
 
 Différence RHF/UHF, Hamiltonien non-bloc diagonal, coefficients complexe pour R<3/2 \\
 
 Influence de la taille de la base en RHF et UHF \\
 
-
-
 \subsection{Exceptional points in the UHF formalism}
 
 RHF vs UHF