modif 1st paragraph of intro
This commit is contained in:
parent
3aa3f3d230
commit
e71301fba5
@ -23,15 +23,16 @@
|
||||
\newcommand{\Ndet}{N_{\text{det}}}
|
||||
\newcommand{\hartree}{$E_h$}
|
||||
|
||||
\newcommand{\LCT}{Laboratoire de Chimie Théorique (UMR 7616), Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Paris, France}
|
||||
\newcommand{\LCT}{Laboratoire de Chimie Th\'eorique (UMR 7616), Sorbonne Universit\'e, CNRS, Paris, France}
|
||||
\newcommand{\ANL}{Argonne Leadership Computing Facility, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439, United States}
|
||||
\newcommand{\LCPQ}{Laboratoire de Chimie et Physique Quantiques (UMR 5626), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, France}
|
||||
\newcommand{\LCPQ}{Laboratoire de Chimie et Physique Quantiques (UMR 5626), Universit\'e de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, France}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
|
||||
\title{Enabling high accuracy diffusion Monte Carlo calculations with
|
||||
range-separated density functional theory and selected configuration interaction}
|
||||
\title{Taming the fixed-node error in diffusion Monte Carlo via range separation}
|
||||
%\title{Enabling high accuracy diffusion Monte Carlo calculations with
|
||||
% range-separated density functional theory and selected configuration interaction}
|
||||
|
||||
\author{Anthony Scemama}
|
||||
\affiliation{\LCPQ}
|
||||
@ -55,32 +56,27 @@
|
||||
\section{Introduction}
|
||||
\label{sec:intro}
|
||||
|
||||
The full configuration interaction (FCI) method within a finite atomic
|
||||
basis set leads to an approximate solution of the Schrödinger
|
||||
equation.
|
||||
This solution is the eigenpair of an approximate Hamiltonian, which is
|
||||
the projection of the exact Hamiltonian onto the finite basis of all
|
||||
possible Slater determinants.
|
||||
The FCI wave function can be interpreted as the constrained solution of the
|
||||
true Hamiltonian, where the solution is forced to span the space
|
||||
provided by the basis.
|
||||
At the complete basis set (CBS) limit, the constraint vanishes and the
|
||||
exact solution is obtained.
|
||||
Hence the FCI method enables a systematic improvement of the
|
||||
calculations by improving the quality of the basis set.
|
||||
Nevertheless, its exponential scaling with the number of electrons and
|
||||
with the size of the basis is prohibitive for large systems.
|
||||
In recent years, the introduction of new algorithms\cite{Booth_2009}
|
||||
and the
|
||||
revival\cite{Abrams_2005,Bytautas_2009,Roth_2009,Giner_2013,Knowles_2015,Holmes_2016,Liu_2016}
|
||||
Within a finite one-electron basis, full configuration interaction (FCI)
|
||||
delivers only an approximate solution of the Schr\"odinger equation.
|
||||
This solution is the eigenpair of an approximate Hamiltonian defined as
|
||||
the projection of the exact Hamiltonian onto the finite many-electron basis of
|
||||
all possible Slater determinants generated within this finite one-electron basis.
|
||||
The FCI wave function can be interpreted as a constrained solution of the
|
||||
true Hamiltonian forced to span the restricted space provided by the one-electron basis.
|
||||
In the complete basis set (CBS) limit, the constraint is lifted and the
|
||||
exact solution is recovered.
|
||||
Hence, the accuracy of a FCI calculation can be systematically improved by increasing the size of the one-electron basis set.
|
||||
Nevertheless, its exponential scaling with the number of electrons and with the size of the basis is prohibitive for most chemical systems.
|
||||
In recent years, the introduction of new algorithms \cite{Booth_2009} and the
|
||||
revival \cite{Abrams_2005,Bytautas_2009,Roth_2009,Giner_2013,Knowles_2015,Holmes_2016,Liu_2016}
|
||||
of selected configuration interaction (sCI)
|
||||
methods\cite{Bender_1969,Huron_1973,Buenker_1974} pushed the limits of
|
||||
the sizes of the systems that could be computed at the FCI level, but
|
||||
the scaling remains exponential unless some bias is introduced leading
|
||||
to a loss of size consistency.
|
||||
methods \cite{Bender_1969,Huron_1973,Buenker_1974} pushed the limits of
|
||||
the sizes of the systems that could be computed at the FCI level.
|
||||
However, the scaling remains exponential unless some bias is introduced leading
|
||||
to a loss of size consistency. % CITE CIPSI 3-CLASS AND INITIATOR APPROXIMATION.
|
||||
|
||||
The Diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) method is a numerical scheme to obtain
|
||||
the exact solution of the Schrödinger equation with an additional
|
||||
Diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) is a numerical scheme to obtain
|
||||
the exact solution of the Schr\"odinger equation with a different
|
||||
constraint, imposing the solution to have the same nodal hypersurface
|
||||
as a given trial wave function.
|
||||
Within this so-called \emph{fixed-node} (FN) approximation,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user