saving work in Sec IV
This commit is contained in:
parent
7d87989a6c
commit
8f068095fd
@ -118,10 +118,10 @@ to a loss of size consistency. \cite{Evangelisti_1983,Cleland_2010,Tenno_2017}
|
||||
|
||||
Another route to solve the Schr\"odinger equation is density-functional theory (DFT). \cite{Hohenberg_1964,Kohn_1999}
|
||||
Present-day DFT calculations are almost exclusively done within the so-called Kohn-Sham (KS) formalism, \cite{Kohn_1965} which
|
||||
transfers the complexity of the many-body problem to the \manu{universal and yet unknown} exchange-correlation (xc) functional thanks to a judicious mapping between a non-interacting reference system and its interacting analog which both have exactly the same one-electron density.
|
||||
transfers the complexity of the many-body problem to the universal and yet unknown exchange-correlation (xc) functional thanks to a judicious mapping between a non-interacting reference system and its interacting analog which both have exactly the same one-electron density.
|
||||
KS-DFT \cite{Hohenberg_1964,Kohn_1965} is now the workhorse of electronic structure calculations for atoms, molecules and solids thanks to its very favorable accuracy/cost ratio. \cite{ParrBook}
|
||||
As compared to WFT, DFT has the indisputable advantage of converging much faster with respect to the size of the basis set. \cite{FraMusLupTou-JCP-15,Loos_2019d,Giner_2020}
|
||||
\manu{However, unlike WFT where many-body perturbation theory provides a precious tool to go toward the exact wave function, there is no systematic way to improve the approximated xc functionals toward the exact functional.}
|
||||
However, unlike WFT where many-body perturbation theory provides a precious tool to go toward the exact wave function, there is no systematic way to improve approximate xc functionals toward the exact functional.
|
||||
Therefore, one faces, in practice, the unsettling choice of the \emph{approximate} xc functional. \cite{Becke_2014}
|
||||
Moreover, because of the approximate nature of the xc functional, although the resolution of the KS equations is variational, the resulting KS energy does not have such property.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -194,11 +194,11 @@ orbitals.\cite{Filippi_2000,Scemama_2006,HaghighiMood_2017,Ludovicy_2019}
|
||||
|
||||
The description of electron correlation within DFT is very different
|
||||
from correlated methods such as FCI or CC.
|
||||
\manu{As mentioned above, within KS-DFT, one solves a mean-field problem
|
||||
As mentioned above, within KS-DFT, one solves a mean-field problem
|
||||
with a modified potential incorporating the effects of electron correlation
|
||||
while maintaining the exact ground state density, whereas in
|
||||
correlated methods the real Hamiltonian is used and the
|
||||
electron-electron interactions are considered.}
|
||||
electron-electron interaction is explicitly considered.
|
||||
Nevertheless, as the orbitals are one-electron functions,
|
||||
the procedure of orbital optimization in the presence of a
|
||||
Jastrow factor can be interpreted as a self-consistent field procedure
|
||||
@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ energy is obtained as
|
||||
E_0= \mel{\Psi^{\mu}}{\hat{T}+\hat{W}_\text{{ee}}^{\text{lr},\mu}+\hat{V}_{\text{ne}}}{\Psi^{\mu}}+\bar{E}^{\text{sr},\mu}_{\text{Hxc}}[n_{\Psi^\mu}].
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
||||
\manu{Pour moi y'a pas de problèmes avec cette phrase. Note that for $\mu=0$ the long-range interaction vanishes}, \ie,
|
||||
Note that for $\mu=0$ the long-range interaction vanishes, \ie,
|
||||
$w_{\text{ee}}^{\text{lr},\mu=0}(r) = 0$, and thus RS-DFT reduces to standard
|
||||
KS-DFT and $\Psi^\mu$ is the KS determinant. For $\mu = \infty$, the long-range
|
||||
interaction becomes the standard Coulomb interaction, \ie,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user