saving work in spin part
This commit is contained in:
parent
e9f2120a30
commit
34fa901afa
@ 510,7 +510,7 @@ $\mu$, and compute the associated FNDMC energy keeping fixed all the


parameters impacting the nodal surface, such as the CI coefficients and the molecular orbitals.




%======================================================


\subsection{Fixednode energy of $\Psi^\mu$}


\subsection{Fixednode energy of RSDFTCIPSI trial wave functions}


\label{sec:fndmc_mu}


%======================================================


From Table~\ref{tab:h2odmc} and Fig.~\ref{fig:h2odmc}, where we report the fixednode energy of \ce{H2O} as a function of $\mu$ for various shortrange density functionals and basis sets,


@ 547,7 +547,7 @@ The takehome message of this first numerical study is that RSDFT trial wave fu


This is a key result of the present study.




%======================================================


\subsection{Link between RSDFT and Jastrow factor}


\subsection{RSDFT vs Jastrow factor}


\label{sec:rsdftj}


%======================================================


The data presented in Sec.~\ref{sec:fndmc_mu} evidence that, in a finite basis, RSDFT can provide


@ 1023,7 +1023,8 @@ An extremely important feature required to get accurate


atomization energies is sizeconsistency (or strict separability),


since the numbers of correlated electron pairs in the molecule and its isolated atoms


are different.


The energies computed within DFT are sizeconsistent, and




KSDFT energies are sizeconsistent, and


\titou{because it is a meanfield method the convergence to the CBS limit


is relatively fast}. \cite{FraMusLupTouJCP15}


Hence, DFT methods are very well adapted to



Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user