Merge branch 'master' of https://git.irsamc.ups-tlse.fr/scemama/RSDFT-CIPSI-QMC
This commit is contained in:
commit
0f38c53be5
@ -1,13 +1,47 @@
|
||||
%% This BibTeX bibliography file was created using BibDesk.
|
||||
%% http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/
|
||||
|
||||
%% Created for Pierre-Francois Loos at 2020-08-17 09:17:11 +0200
|
||||
%% Created for Pierre-Francois Loos at 2020-08-17 10:19:43 +0200
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
%% Saved with string encoding Unicode (UTF-8)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Scemama_2016,
|
||||
Author = {Scemama, Anthony and Applencourt, Thomas and Giner, Emmanuel and Caffarel, Michel},
|
||||
Date-Added = {2020-08-17 10:18:21 +0200},
|
||||
Date-Modified = {2020-08-17 10:18:21 +0200},
|
||||
Doi = {10.1002/jcc.24382},
|
||||
Issn = {0192-8651},
|
||||
Journal = {J. Comput. Chem.},
|
||||
Month = {Jun},
|
||||
Number = {20},
|
||||
Pages = {1866--1875},
|
||||
Publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
|
||||
Title = {Quantum Monte Carlo with very large multideterminant wavefunctions},
|
||||
Url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.24382},
|
||||
Volume = {37},
|
||||
Year = {2016},
|
||||
Bdsk-Url-1 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.24382}}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Scemama_2014,
|
||||
Author = {Scemama, A. and Applencourt, T. and Giner, E. and Caffarel, M.},
|
||||
Date-Added = {2020-08-17 10:18:00 +0200},
|
||||
Date-Modified = {2020-08-17 10:18:00 +0200},
|
||||
Doi = {10.1063/1.4903985},
|
||||
Issn = {1089-7690},
|
||||
Journal = {J. Chem. Phys.},
|
||||
Month = {Dec},
|
||||
Number = {24},
|
||||
Pages = {244110},
|
||||
Publisher = {AIP Publishing},
|
||||
Title = {Accurate nonrelativistic ground-state energies of 3d transition metal atoms},
|
||||
Url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4903985},
|
||||
Volume = {141},
|
||||
Year = {2014},
|
||||
Bdsk-Url-1 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4903985}}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Scemama_2019,
|
||||
Author = {A. Scemama and M. Caffarel and A. Benali and D. Jacquemin and P. F. Loos.},
|
||||
Date-Added = {2020-08-17 09:16:18 +0200},
|
||||
|
@ -174,13 +174,16 @@ In such cases or when very high accuracy is required, a viable alternative is to
|
||||
``post-FCI'' method. A multi-determinant trial wave function is then produced by
|
||||
approaching FCI with a SCI method such as the \emph{configuration interaction using a perturbative
|
||||
selection made iteratively} (CIPSI) method.\cite{Giner_2013,Giner_2015,Caffarel_2016_2}
|
||||
\titou{When the basis set is enlarged, the trial wave function gets closer to
|
||||
When the basis set is enlarged, the trial wave function gets closer to
|
||||
the exact wave function, so we expect the nodal surface to be
|
||||
improved.\cite{Caffarel_2016}}
|
||||
This technique has the advantage of using the FCI nodes in a given basis
|
||||
set, which is perfectly well defined and therefore makes the calculations reproducible in a
|
||||
improved.\cite{Caffarel_2016}
|
||||
Note that, as discussed in Ref.~\onlinecite{Caffarel_2016_2}, there is no mathematical guarantee that increasing the size of the one-electron basis lowers the FN-DMC energy, because the variational principle does not explicitly optimize the nodal surface, nor the FN-DMC energy.
|
||||
However, in all applications performed so far, \cite{Giner_2013,Scemama_2014,Scemama_2016,Giner_2015,Caffarel_2016,Scemama_2018,Scemama_2018b,Scemama_2019} a systematic decrease of the FN-DMC energy has been observed whenever the SCI trial wave function is improved variationally upon enlargement of the basis set.
|
||||
|
||||
The technique relying on SCI multi-determinant trial wave functions described above has the advantage of using near-FCI quality nodes in a given basis
|
||||
set, which is perfectly well defined and therefore makes the calculations systematically improvable and reproducible in a
|
||||
black-box way without needing any QMC expertise.
|
||||
Nevertheless, this technique cannot be applied to large systems because of the
|
||||
Nevertheless, this procedure cannot be applied to large systems because of the
|
||||
exponential growth of the number of Slater determinants in the trial wave function.
|
||||
Extrapolation techniques have been used to estimate the FN-DMC energies
|
||||
obtained with FCI wave functions,\cite{Scemama_2018,Scemama_2018b,Scemama_2019} and other authors
|
||||
@ -190,13 +193,13 @@ of a Jastrow factor to keep the number of determinants
|
||||
small,\cite{Giner_2016} and where the consistency between the
|
||||
different wave functions is kept by imposing a constant energy
|
||||
difference between the estimated FCI energy and the variational energy
|
||||
of the CI wave function.\cite{Dash_2018,Dash_2019}
|
||||
|
||||
of the SCI wave function.\cite{Dash_2018,Dash_2019}
|
||||
Nevertheless, finding a robust protocol to obtain high accuracy
|
||||
calculations which can be reproduced systematically and
|
||||
applicable to large systems with a multi-configurational character is
|
||||
still an active field of research. The present paper falls
|
||||
within this context.
|
||||
|
||||
The central idea of the present work, and the launch-pad for the remainder of this study, is that one can combine the various strengths of WFT, DFT, and DMC in order to create a new hybrid method with more attractive properties.
|
||||
In particular, we show here that one can combine CIPSI and KS-DFT via the range separation (RS) of the interelectronic Coulomb operator \cite{Sav-INC-96a,Toulouse_2004} to obtain accurate FN-DMC energies with compact multi-determinant trial wave functions.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user