From dff5f2bc7a85994694ed4be44337b8c2ac713a94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Micka=C3=ABl=20V=C3=A9ril?= Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:53:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] MSE explicit --- Manuscript/QUEST_WIREs.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Manuscript/QUEST_WIREs.tex b/Manuscript/QUEST_WIREs.tex index 6bf223c..8de3660 100644 --- a/Manuscript/QUEST_WIREs.tex +++ b/Manuscript/QUEST_WIREs.tex @@ -719,7 +719,7 @@ And $\err_\meth$ the error vector of the method $\meth$ compared to the referenc When the vertical excitation $x$ is defined for the method $\meth$ and the method $\text{ref}$. So with $\nExnn$ the size of the vector $\vec{\err^x_\meth}$ \begin{gather} - MSE_\meth = \overline{{\vec{\err_\meth}}} \\ + MSE_\meth = \overline{{\vec{\err_\meth}}} = \frac{1}{\nExnn}\sum_x=1^\nExnn\err_\meth^x \\ MAE_\meth = \overline{\abs{\vec{\err_\meth}}} \\ RMSE_\meth = \sqrt{\overline{\vec{\err_\meth}^2}} \\ SDE_\meth = \sqrt{\frac{1}{\nExnn}\sum_{x=1}^\nExnn\err_x^2-MAE^2}