fix double sentence

Revised_Manuscript/srDFT_SC.tex

@@ -763,7 +763,6 @@ The estimated exact energies are based on a fit of experimental data and obtaine
         \caption{
         Potential energy curves of the \ce{F2} molecule calculated with exFCI and basis-set corrected exFCI using the aug-cc-pVDZ (top) and aug-cc-pVTZ (bottom) basis sets.
 The estimated exact energies are based on a fit of experimental data and obtained from Ref.~\onlinecite{LieCle-JCP-74a}.
-        The estimated exact energies are based on a fit of the non-relativistic valence-only CEEIS data extracted from Ref.~\onlinecite{BytNagGorRue-JCP-07} \alert{which one is correct?}.
         \label{fig:F2}}
 \end{figure*}
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

response/response.tex

@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ The basis-set correction can indeed be applied to any approximation to FCI such
 
 {\it We note that, even though we use near-FCI energies in this work, the DFT-based basis-set correction could also be applied to any approximation to FCI such as multireference perturbation theory, similarly to what was done for weakly correlated systems for which the basis-set correction was applied to CCSD(T) calculations [51].}
 
-%We have also corrected the three minor problems seen by the referee. #TO BE DONE
+We have also corrected the three minor problems seen by the referee.
 
 \subsection*{Comments of reviewer 2 and reply}
 \subsubsection*{Comments of reviewer 2}