a few changes related to Pina and Arjan's comments

This commit is contained in:
Julien Toulouse 2019-10-23 15:28:18 +02:00
parent 1e0159f1b8
commit 221f0070b8

View File

@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
\newcommand{\A}[1]{A_{#1}}
\newcommand{\B}[1]{B_{#1}}
\newcommand{\G}[2]{G_{#1}^{#2}}
\newcommand{\Gs}[1]{G_\text{s}^{#1}}
\newcommand{\Gs}[1]{G_\text{f}^{#1}}
\newcommand{\F}[2]{F_{#1}^{#2}}
\newcommand{\Po}[2]{P_{#1}^{#2}}
\newcommand{\W}[2]{W_{#1}^{#2}}
@ -113,6 +113,7 @@
\newcommand{\hT}{\Hat{T}}
\newcommand{\hWee}[1]{\Hat{W}_\text{ee}^{#1}}
\newcommand{\MO}[1]{\phi_{#1}}
\newcommand{\stat}[1]{\underset{#1}{\text{stat}}}
% Matrices
\newcommand{\bOm}{\boldsymbol{\Omega}}
@ -273,12 +274,12 @@ where $\F{}{\Bas}[\n{}{}]$ is the Levy-Lieb density functional with wave functio
\F{}{\Bas}[\n{}{}] = \min_{\wf{}{\Bas} \rightsquigarrow \n{}{}} \mel*{\wf{}{\Bas}}{ \hT + \hWee{}}{\wf{}{\Bas}},
\end{equation}
and $\bE{}{\Bas}[\n{}{}]$ is the complementary basis-correction density functional. \cite{GinPraFerAssSavTou-JCP-18}
In the present work, instead of using wave-function methods for calculating $\F{}{\Bas}[\n{}{}]$, we re-express it with a constrained search over $\Ne$-representable one-electron Green functions $\G{}{\Bas}(\br{},\br{}',\omega)$ representable in the basis set $\Bas$
In the present work, instead of using wave-function methods for calculating $\F{}{\Bas}[\n{}{}]$, we use Green-function methods. We assume that there exists a functional $\Omega^\Bas[\G{}{\Bas}]$ of $\Ne$-representable one-electron Green functions $\G{}{\Bas}(\br{},\br{}',\omega)$ representable in the basis set $\Bas$ and yielding the density $n$ which gives $\F{}{\Bas}[\n{}{}]$ at a stationary point
\begin{equation}
\F{}{\Bas}[\n{}{}] = \min_{\G{}{\Bas} \rightsquigarrow \n{}{}} \Omega^\Bas[\G{}{\Bas}],
\F{}{\Bas}[\n{}{}] = \stat{\G{}{\Bas} \rightsquigarrow \n{}{}} \Omega^\Bas[\G{}{\Bas}].
\label{eq:FBn}
\end{equation}
where $\Omega^\Bas[G]$ is chosen to be a Klein-like energy functional of the Green function (see, \textit{e.g.}, Refs.~\onlinecite{SteLee-BOOK-13, MarReiCep-BOOK-16, DahLee-JCP-05, DahLeeBar-IJQC-05, DahLeeBar-PRA-06})
The reason why we use a stationary condition rather than a minimization condition is that only a stationary property is generally known for functionals of the Green function. For example, we can choose for $\Omega^\Bas[G]$ a Klein-like energy functional (see, \textit{e.g.}, Refs.~\onlinecite{SteLee-BOOK-13, MarReiCep-BOOK-16, DahLee-JCP-05, DahLeeBar-IJQC-05, DahLeeBar-PRA-06})
\begin{equation}
\Omega^\Bas[\G{}{}] = \Tr[\ln( - \G{}{} ) ] - \Tr[ (\Gs{\Bas})^{-1} \G{}{} - 1 ] + \Phi_\Hxc^\Bas[\G{}{}],
\label{eq:OmegaB}
@ -287,7 +288,7 @@ where $(\Gs{\Bas})^{-1}$ is the projection into $\Bas$ of the inverse free-parti
\begin{equation}
(\Gs{})^{-1}(\br{},\br{}',\omega)= \qty(\omega + \frac{\nabla^2_{\br{}}}{2} ) \delta(\br{}-\br{}'),
\end{equation}
and
and we have introduced the trace
\begin{equation}
\Tr[A B] = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i} \, e^{i \omega 0^+} \iint A(\br{},\br{}',\omega) B(\br{}',\br{}{},\omega) \dbr{} \dbr{}'.
\end{equation}
@ -297,25 +298,36 @@ In Eq.~\eqref{eq:OmegaB}, $\Phi_\Hxc^\Bas[\G{}{}]$ is a Hartree-exchange-correla
\end{equation}
Inserting Eqs.~\eqref{eq:Fn} and \eqref{eq:FBn} into Eq.~\eqref{eq:E0B}, we finally arrive at
\begin{equation}
\E{0}{\Bas} = \min_{\G{}{\Bas}} \qty{ \Omega^\Bas[\G{}{\Bas}] + \int \vne(\br{}) \n{\G{}{\Bas}}{}(\br{}) \dbr{} + \bE{}{\Bas}[\n{\G{}{\Bas}}{}] },
\E{0}{\Bas} = \stat{\G{}{\Bas}} \qty{ \Omega^\Bas[\G{}{\Bas}] + \int \vne(\br{}) \n{\G{}{\Bas}}{}(\br{}) \dbr{} + \bE{}{\Bas}[\n{\G{}{\Bas}}{}] },
\label{eq:E0BGB}
\end{equation}
where the minimization is over $\Ne$-representable one-electron Green functions $\G{}{\Bas}(\br{},\br{}',\omega)$ representable in the basis set $\Bas$.
where the stationary point is searched over $\Ne$-representable one-electron Green functions $\G{}{\Bas}(\br{},\br{}',\omega)$ representable in the basis set $\Bas$.
The stationary condition from Eq.~\eqref{eq:E0BGB} gives the following Dyson equation
The stationary condition from Eq.~\eqref{eq:E0BGB} is
\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{\delta}{\delta \G{}{\Bas}} \Biggl( \Omega^\Bas[\G{}{\Bas}] + \int \vne(\br{}) \n{\G{}{\Bas}}{}(\br{}) \dbr{} + \bE{}{\Bas}[\n{\G{}{\Bas}}{}]
\nonumber\\
- \lambda \int \n{\G{}{\Bas}}{}(\br{}) \dbr{} \Biggl) = 0,
\label{eq:stat}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\lambda$ is the chemical potential (enforcing the electron number). It leads the following Dyson equation
\begin{equation}
(\G{}{\Bas})^{-1} = (\G{0}{\Bas})^{-1}- \Sig{\Hxc}{\Bas}[\G{}{\Bas}]- \bSig{}{\Bas}[\n{\G{}{\Bas}}{}],
\label{eq:Dyson}
\end{equation}
where $(\G{0}{\Bas})^{-1}$ is the basis projection of the inverse non-interacting Green function with potential $\vne(\br{})$, \textit{i.e.},
\begin{equation}
(\G{0}{})^{-1}(\br{},\br{}',\omega)= \qty(\omega + \frac{\nabla_{\br{}}^2}{2} + \vne(\br{}) + \lambda) \delta(\br{}-\br{}')
(\G{0}{})^{-1}(\br{},\br{}',\omega)= \qty(\omega + \frac{\nabla_{\br{}}^2}{2} - \vne(\br{}) + \lambda) \delta(\br{}-\br{}'),
\end{equation}
with the chemical potential $\lambda$, and $\bSig{}{\Bas}$ is a frequency-independent local self-energy coming from the functional derivative of the complementary basis-correction density functional
and $\bSig{}{\Bas}$ is a frequency-independent local self-energy coming from the functional derivative of the complementary basis-correction density functional
\begin{equation}
\bSig{}{\Bas}[\n{}{}](\br{},\br{}') = \bpot{}{\Bas}[\n{}{}](\br{}) \delta(\br{}-\br{}'),
\end{equation}
with $\bpot{}{\Bas}[\n{}{}](\br{}) = \delta \bE{}{\Bas}[\n{}{}] / \delta \n{}{}(\br{})$.
with $\bpot{}{\Bas}[\n{}{}](\br{}) = \delta \bE{}{\Bas}[\n{}{}] / \delta \n{}{}(\br{})$. This is found from Eq.~\eqref{eq:stat} by using the chain rule,
\begin{equation}
\frac{\delta \bE{}{\Bas}[\n{}{}]}{\delta \G{}{}(\br{},\br{}',\omega)} = \int \frac{\delta \bE{}{\Bas}[\n{}{}]}{\delta n(\br{}'')} \frac{\delta n(\br{}'')}{\delta \G{}{}(\br{},\br{}',\omega)} \dbr{}'',
\end{equation}
and $\n{}{}(\br{}) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i} \, e^{i \omega 0^+} \G{}{}(\br{},\br{},\omega)$.
The solution of the Dyson equation \eqref{eq:Dyson} gives the Green function $\G{}{\Bas}(\br{},\br{}',\omega)$ which is not exact (even using the exact complementary basis-correction density functional $\bSig{}{\Bas}[\n{}{}]$) but should converge more rapidly with the basis set thanks to the presence of the basis-set correction $\bSig{}{\Bas}$.
Of course, in the CBS limit, the basis-set correction vanishes and the Green function becomes exact, \textit{i.e.},
\begin{align}
@ -324,7 +336,7 @@ Of course, in the CBS limit, the basis-set correction vanishes and the Green fun
\lim_{\Bas \to \CBS} \G{}{\Bas} & = \G{}{}.
\end{align}
The Dyson equation \eqref{eq:Dyson} can be written with an arbitrary reference
The Dyson equation \eqref{eq:Dyson} can also be written with an arbitrary reference
\begin{equation}
(\G{}{\Bas})^{-1} = (\G{\text{ref}}{\Bas})^{-1} - \qty( \Sig{\Hxc}{\Bas}[\G{}{\Bas}]- \Sig{\text{ref}}{\Bas} ) - \bSig{}{\Bas}[\n{\G{}{\Bas}}{}],
\end{equation}