loos/srDFT_G2
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
4def99ccba
srDFT_G2/Manuscript/G2-srDFT.tex
eginer 4def99ccba updated manuscript
2019-04-02 16:23:05 +02:00

663 lines
35 KiB
TeX
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

\documentclass[aip,jcp,reprint,noshowkeys]{revtex4-1}
\usepackage{graphicx,dcolumn,bm,xcolor,microtype,multirow,amscd,amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts,physics,mhchem,longtable}
\usepackage{mathpazo,libertine}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\newcommand{\alert}[1]{\textcolor{red}{#1}}
\definecolor{darkgreen}{RGB}{0, 180, 0}
\newcommand{\beurk}[1]{\textcolor{darkgreen}{#1}}
\newcommand{\trash}[1]{\textcolor{red}{\sout{#1}}}
\usepackage{xspace}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\hypersetup{
colorlinks=true,
linkcolor=blue,
filecolor=blue,
urlcolor=blue,
citecolor=blue
}
\newcommand{\cdash}{\multicolumn{1}{c}{---}}
\newcommand{\mc}{\multicolumn}
\newcommand{\fnm}{\footnotemark}
\newcommand{\fnt}{\footnotetext}
\newcommand{\tabc}[1]{\multicolumn{1}{c}{#1}}
\newcommand{\mr}{\multirow}
\newcommand{\SI}{\textcolor{blue}{supporting information}}
\newcommand{\br}{\mathbf{r}}
% second quantized operators
\newcommand{\psix}[1]{\hat{\Psi}\left({\bf X}_{#1}\right)}
\newcommand{\psixc}[1]{\hat{\Psi}^{\dagger}\left({\bf X}_{#1}\right)}
\newcommand{\ai}[1]{\hat{a}_{#1}}
\newcommand{\aic}[1]{\hat{a}^{\dagger}_{#1}}
\newcommand{\vijkl}[0]{V_{ij}^{kl}}
\newcommand{\phix}[2]{\phi_{#1}(\bfr{#2})}
\newcommand{\phixprim}[2]{\phi_{#1}(\bfr{#2}')}
%operators
\newcommand{\elemm}[3]{{\ensuremath{\bra{#1}{#2}\ket{#3}}\xspace}}
%\newcommand{\ket}[1]{{\ensuremath{|#1\rangle}\xspace}}
%\newcommand{\bra}[1]{{\ensuremath{\langle #1|}\xspace}}
% energies
\newcommand{\EHF}{E_\text{HF}}
\newcommand{\Ec}{E_\text{c}}
\newcommand{\EPT}{E_\text{PT2}}
\newcommand{\EFCI}{E_\text{FCI}}
\newcommand{\EsCI}{E_\text{sCI}}
\newcommand{\EDMC}{E_\text{DMC}}
\newcommand{\EexFCI}{E_\text{exFCI}}
\newcommand{\EexFCIbasis}{E_\text{exFCI}^{\basis}}
\newcommand{\EexDMC}{E_\text{exDMC}}
\newcommand{\Ead}{\Delta E_\text{ad}}
\newcommand{\efci}[0]{E_{\text{FCI}}^{\basis}}
\newcommand{\efcicomplete}[0]{E_{\text{FCI}}^{\infty}}
\newcommand{\efuncbasisfci}[0]{\bar{E}^\basis[\denfci]}
\newcommand{\efuncbasis}[0]{\bar{E}^\basis[\den]}
\newcommand{\ecmubis}[0]{\bar{E}_{\text{c,md}}^{\text{sr}}[\denr;\,\mu]}
\newcommand{\ecmubisldapbe}[0]{\bar{E}_{\text{c,md}\,\text{PBE}}^{\text{sr}}[\denr;\,\mu]}
\newcommand{\ecmuapprox}[0]{\bar{E}_{\text{c,md-}\mathcal{X}}^{\text{sr}}[\den;\,\mu]}
\newcommand{\ecmuapproxmur}[0]{\bar{E}_{\text{c,md-}\mathcal{X}}^{\text{sr}}[\den;\,\mur]}
\newcommand{\ecmuapproxmurfci}[0]{\bar{E}_{\text{c,md-}\mathcal{X}}^{\text{sr}}[\denfci;\,\mur]}
\newcommand{\efuncbasislda}[0]{\bar{E}_{\text{LDA}}^{\basis,\psibasis}[\den]}
\newcommand{\efuncbasisldaval}[0]{\bar{E}_{\text{LDA, val}}^{\basis,\psibasis}[\den]}
\newcommand{\efuncbasispbe}[0]{\bar{E}_{\text{PBE}}^{\basis,\psibasis}[\den]}
\newcommand{\efuncbasispbeval}[0]{\bar{E}_{\text{PBE, val}}^{\basis,\psibasis}[\den]}
\newcommand{\emulda}[0]{\bar{\varepsilon}^{\text{sr},\text{unif}}_{\text{c,md}}\left(\denr;\mu({\bf r};\psibasis)\right)}
\newcommand{\emuldaval}[0]{\bar{\varepsilon}^{\text{sr},\text{unif}}_{\text{c,md}}\left(\denval ({\bf r});\murval;\psibasis)\right)}
% numbers
\newcommand{\rnum}[0]{{\rm I\!R}}
\newcommand{\bfr}[1]{{\bf X}_{#1}}
\newcommand{\bfrb}[1]{{\bf r}_{#1}}
\newcommand{\dr}[1]{\text{d}\bfr{#1}}
\newcommand{\rr}[2]{\bfr{#1}, \bfr{#2}}
\newcommand{\rrrr}[4]{\bfr{#1}, \bfr{#2},\bfr{#3},\bfr{#4} }
% effective interaction
\newcommand{\twodm}[4]{\elemm{\Psi}{\psixc{#4}\psixc{#3} \psix{#2}\psix{#1}}{\Psi}}
\newcommand{\murpsi}[0]{\mu({\bf r};\psibasis)}
\newcommand{\mur}[0]{\mu({\bf r})}
\newcommand{\murr}[1]{\mu({\bf r}_{#1})}
\newcommand{\murval}[0]{\mu_{\text{val}}({\bf r})}
\newcommand{\murpsival}[0]{\mu_{\text{val}}({\bf r};\psibasis)}
\newcommand{\murrval}[1]{\mu_{\text{val}}({\bf r}_{#1})}
\newcommand{\weeopmu}[0]{\hat{W}_{\text{ee}}^{\text{lr},\mu}}
\newcommand{\wbasis}[0]{W_{\psibasis}(\bfr{1},\bfr{2})}
\newcommand{\wbasisval}[0]{W_{\psibasis}^{\text{val}}(\bfr{1},\bfr{2})}
\newcommand{\fbasis}[0]{f_{\psibasis}(\bfr{1},\bfr{2})}
\newcommand{\fbasisval}[0]{f_{\psibasis}^{\text{val}}(\bfr{1},\bfr{2})}
\newcommand{\ontop}[2]{ n^{(2)}_{#1}({\bf #2}_1)}
\newcommand{\twodmrpsi}[0]{ n^{(2)}_{\psibasis}(\rrrr{1}{2}{2}{1})}
\newcommand{\twodmrdiagpsi}[0]{ n^{(2)}_{\psibasis}(\rr{1}{2})}
\newcommand{\twodmrdiagpsival}[0]{ n^{(2)}_{\psibasis,\,\text{val}}(\rr{1}{2})}
\newcommand{\gammamnpq}[1]{\Gamma_{mn}^{pq}[#1]}
\newcommand{\gammamnkl}[0]{\Gamma_{mn}^{kl}}
\newcommand{\gammaklmn}[1]{\Gamma_{kl}^{mn}[#1]}
\newcommand{\wbasiscoal}[1]{W_{\psibasis}({\bf r}_{#1})}
\newcommand{\ontoppsi}[1]{ n^{(2)}_{\psibasis}(\bfr{#1},\barr{#1},\barr{#1},\bfr{#1})}
\newcommand{\wbasiscoalval}[1]{W_{\psibasis}^{\text{val}}({\bf r}_{#1})}
\newcommand{\ontoppsival}[1]{ n^{(2)}_{\psibasis}^{\text{val}}(\bfr{#1},\barr{#1},\barr{#1},\bfr{#1})}
\newcommand{\ex}[4]{$^{#1}#2_{#3}^{#4}$}
\newcommand{\ra}{\rightarrow}
\newcommand{\De}{D_\text{e}}
% Basis sets
\newcommand{\basis}[0]{\mathcal{B}}
\newcommand{\basisval}[0]{\mathcal{B}_\text{val}}
% densities
\newcommand{\denfci}[0]{\den_{\psifci}}
\newcommand{\denrfci}[0]{\denr_{\psifci}}
\newcommand{\dencipsi}[0]{{n}_{\text{CIPSI}}^\basis({\bf r})}
\newcommand{\den}[0]{{n}}
\newcommand{\denval}[0]{{n}^{\text{val}}}
\newcommand{\denr}[0]{{n}({\bf r})}
\newcommand{\onedmval}[0]{\rho_{ij,\sigma}^{\text{val}}}
% wave functions
\newcommand{\psifci}[0]{\Psi^{\basis}_{\text{FCI}}}
\newcommand{\psibasis}[0]{\Psi^{\basis}}
\newcommand{\psimu}[0]{\Psi^{\mu}}
% operators
\newcommand{\weeopbasis}[0]{\hat{W}_{\text{ee}}^\basis}
\newcommand{\kinop}[0]{\hat{T}}
\newcommand{\weeopbasisval}[0]{\hat{W}_{\text{ee}}^{\basisval}}
\newcommand{\weeop}[0]{\hat{W}_{\text{ee}}}
% units
\newcommand{\IneV}[1]{#1 eV}
\newcommand{\InAU}[1]{#1 a.u.}
\newcommand{\InAA}[1]{#1 \AA}
\newcommand{\pis}{\pi^\star}
\newcommand{\si}{\sigma}
\newcommand{\sis}{\sigma^\star}
\newcommand{\LCPQ}{Laboratoire de Chimie et Physique Quantiques (UMR 5626), Universit\'e de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, France}
\newcommand{\LCT}{Laboratoire de Chimie Th\'eorique, Universit\'e Pierre et Marie Curie, Sorbonne Universit\'e, CNRS, Paris, France}
\begin{document}
\title{G2 Atomization Energies With Chemical Accuracy}
\author{Bath\'elemy Pradines}
\affiliation{\LCPQ}
\author{Anthony Scemama}
\affiliation{\LCPQ}
\author{Julien Toulouse}
\affiliation{\LCT}
\author{Pierre-Fran\c{c}ois Loos}
\email[Corresponding author: ]{loos@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr}
\affiliation{\LCPQ}
\author{Emmanuel Giner}
\affiliation{\LCT}
\begin{abstract}
\end{abstract}
\maketitle
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Introduction}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Theory}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
The basis-set correction investigated here proposes to use the RSDFT formalism to capture a part of the short-range correlation effects missing from the description of the WFT in a finite basis set.
Here, we briefly explain the working equations and notations needed for this work, and the interested reader can find the detailed formal derivation of the theory in \cite{GinPraFerAssSavTou-JCP-18}.
\subsection{Correcting the basis set error of any wave function method}
Consider an incomplete basis-set $\basis$ for which we assume to have accurate approximations of both the FCI density $\denfci$ and energy $\efci$. According to equation (15) of \cite{GinPraFerAssSavTou-JCP-18}, one can approximate the exact ground state energy $E_0$ as
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:e0basis}
E_0 \approx \efci + \efuncbasisfci
\end{equation}
where $\efuncbasis$ is the complementary density functional defined in equation (8) of \cite{GinPraFerAssSavTou-JCP-18}
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:E_funcbasis}
\efuncbasisfci = & \min_{\Psi \rightarrow \denfci} \elemm{\Psi}{\kinop + \weeop}{\Psi} \\&- \min_{\psibasis \rightarrow \denfci} \elemm{\psibasis}{\kinop + \weeop}{\psibasis},
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where $\Psi$ is a general wave function being obtained in a complete basis. Provided that functional $\efuncbasis$ is known exactly, the only approximation performed in \eqref{eq:e0basis} is that the FCI density $\denfci$ coincides with the exact ground state density, which in general is a reasonable approximation as the density converges rapidly with the basis set.
An important aspect of such a theory is that, in the limit of a complete basis set $\basis$ (which we refer as $\basis \rightarrow \infty$), the functional $\efuncbasisfci$ tends to zero
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:limitfunc}
\lim_{\basis \rightarrow \infty} \efuncbasisfci = 0
\end{equation}
which implies that the exact ground state energy coincides with the FCI energy in a computed in complete basis set (which we refer as $\efcicomplete$)
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:limitfunc}
\lim_{\basis \rightarrow \infty} \efci + \efuncbasisfci = \efcicomplete\,\,.
\end{equation}
We propose here to generalize this procedure to any WFT approach.
The functional $\efuncbasisfci$ is not universal as it depends on the basis set $\basis$ used. A simple analytical form for such a functional is of course not known and we approximate it in two-steps. First, we define a real-space representation of the coulomb interaction projected in $\basis$, which is then fitted with a long-range interaction thanks to a range-separation parameter $\mu(r)$ varying in space (see \ref{sec:weff}).
Then, we choose a specific class of short-range density functionals, namely the short-range correlation functionals with multi-determinantal reference (ECMD) introduced by Toulouse \textit{et al}\cite{Toulouse2005_ecmd}, that we evaluate at the FCI density $\denfci$ (see \ref{sec:ecmd}) and with the range-separation parameter $\mu(r)$ varying in space.
\subsection{Generalization to any WFT method}
The theory provided in \cite{GinPraFerAssSavTou-JCP-18} proposes a basis set correction to a FCI or selected CI wave function while ensuring the correct limit for a complete basis set. We propose here to generalize it to any WFT method.
Consider a general WFT model $\mathcal{Y}$ which provides a reference wave function $\ket{\Psi_{\mathcal{Y}}^{(0)}}$ and an energy $E_{\mathcal{Y}}$.
\subsection{Definition of a real-space representation of the coulomb operator truncated in a basis-set $\basis$}
One of the consequences of the use of an incomplete basis-set $\basis$ is that the wave function does not present a cusp near the electron coalescence point, which means that all derivatives of the wave function are continuous. As the exact electronic cusp originates from the divergence of the coulomb interaction at the electron coalescence point, a cusp-free wave function could also come from a non-divergent electron-electron interaction. Therefore, the impact of the incompleteness of a finite basis-set $\basis$ can be thought as a cutting of the divergence of the coulomb interaction at the electron coalescence point.
The present paragraph briefly describes how to obtain an effective interaction $\wbasis$ which:
\begin{itemize}
\item is non-divergent at the electron coalescence point as long as an incomplete basis set $\basis$ is used,
\item tends to the regular $1/r_{12}$ interaction in the limit of a complete basis set $\basis$.
\end{itemize}
\subsubsection{General definition of an effective interaction for the basis set $\basis$}
Consider the coulomb operator projected in the basis-set $\basis$
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\weeopbasis = \frac{1}{2}\,\, \sum_{ijkl\,\,\in\,\,\basis} \,\, \vijkl \,\, \aic{k}\aic{l}\ai{j}\ai{i},
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where the indices run over all orthonormal spin-orbitals in $\basis$ and $\vijkl$ are the usual coulomb two-electron integrals.
Consider now the expectation value of $\weeopbasis$ over a general wave function $\psibasis$ belonging to the $N-$electron Hilbert space spanned by the basis set $\basis$.
After a few mathematical work (see appendix A of \cite{GinPraFerAssSavTou-JCP-18} for a detailed derivation), such an expectation value can be rewritten as an integral over $\rnum^6$:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:expectweeb}
\elemm{\psibasis}{\weeopbasis}{\psibasis} = \frac{1}{2}\,\,\iint \dr{1}\,\dr{2} \,\, \fbasis,
\end{equation}
where the function $\fbasis$ is
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:fbasis}
\begin{aligned}
\fbasis = \sum_{ijklmn\,\,\in\,\,\basis} & \vijkl \,\, \gammaklmn{\psibasis} \\& \phix{n}{2} \phix{m}{1} \phix{i}{1} \phix{j}{2},
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
$\gammamnpq{\psibasis}$ is the two-body density tensor of $\psibasis$
\begin{equation}
\gammamnpq{\psibasis} = \elemm{\psibasis}{ \aic{p}\aic{q}\ai{n}\ai{m} }{\psibasis},
\end{equation}
and $\bfr{}$ collects the space and spin variables,
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:define_x}
\begin{aligned}
&\bfr{} = \left({\bf r},\sigma \right)\qquad {\bf r} \in {\rm I\!R}^3,\,\, \sigma = \pm \frac{1}{2}\\
&\int \, \dr{} = \sum_{\sigma = \pm \frac{1}{2}}\,\int_{{\rm I\!R}^3} \, \text{d}{\bf r}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Then, consider the expectation value of the exact coulomb operator over $\psibasis$
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:expectwee}
\elemm{\psibasis}{\weeop}{\psibasis} = \frac{1}{2}\,\,\iint \dr{1}\,\dr{2} \,\, \frac{1}{r_{12}} \twodmrdiagpsi\,\,
\end{equation}
where $\twodmrdiagpsi$ is the two-body density associated to $\psibasis$.
Because $\psibasis$ belongs to $\basis$, such an expectation value coincides with the expectation value of $\weeopbasis$
\begin{equation}
\elemm{\psibasis}{\weeopbasis}{\psibasis} = \elemm{\psibasis}{\weeop}{\psibasis},
\end{equation}
which can be rewritten as:
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:int_eq_wee}
& \iint \dr{1}\,\dr{2} \,\, \wbasis \,\, \twodmrdiagpsi \\ = &\iint \dr{1}\,\dr{2} \,\,\frac{1}{\norm{\bfrb{1} - \bfrb{2} }} \,\, \twodmrdiagpsi.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where we introduced $\wbasis$
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:def_weebasis}
\wbasis = \frac{\fbasis}{\twodmrdiagpsi},
\end{equation}
which is the effective interaction in the basis set $\basis$.
As already discussed in \cite{GinPraFerAssSavTou-JCP-18}, such an effective interaction is symmetric, \textit{a priori} non translational nor rotational invariant if the basis set $\basis$ does not have such symmetries and is necessary \textit{finite} at the electron coalescence point for an incomplete basis set $\basis$.
Also, as demonstrated in the appendix B of \cite{GinPraFerAssSavTou-JCP-18}, $\wbasis$ tends to the regular coulomb interaction $1/r_{12}$ for all points in $(\bfr{1},\bfr{2})$ in the limit of a complete basis set $\basis$.
\subsubsection{Definition of a valence effective interaction}
As the average inter electronic distances are very different between the valence electrons and the core electrons, it can be advantageous to define an effective interaction taking into account only for the valence electrons.
According to \eqref{eq:def_weebasis} and \eqref{eq:expectweeb}, the effective interaction is defined by the expectation value of the coulomb operator over a wave function $\psibasis$. Therefore, to define an effective interaction accounting only for the valence electrons, one needs to define a function $\fbasisval$ satisfying
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:expectweebval}
\elemm{\psibasis}{\weeopbasisval}{\psibasis} = \frac{1}{2}\,\,\iint \dr{1}\,\dr{2} \,\, \fbasisval,
\end{equation}
where $\weeopbasisval$ is the valence coulomb operator defined as
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\weeopbasisval = \frac{1}{2}\,\, \sum_{ijkl\,\,\in\,\,\basisval} \,\, \vijkl \,\, \aic{k}\aic{l}\ai{j}\ai{i}\,\,\,,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
and $\basisval$ is a given set of molecular orbitals associated to the valence space which will be defined later on.
Following the spirit of \eqref{eq:fbasis}, the function $\fbasisval$ can be defined as
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:fbasisval}
\begin{aligned}
\fbasisval = \sum_{ij\,\,\in\,\,\basis} \,\, \sum_{klmn\,\,\in\,\,\basisval} & \vijkl \,\, \gammaklmn{\psibasis} \\& \phix{n}{2} \phix{m}{1} \phix{i}{1} \phix{j}{2}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Then, the effective interaction associated to the valence $\wbasisval$ is simply defines as
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:def_weebasis}
\wbasisval = \frac{\fbasisval}{\twodmrdiagpsival},
\end{equation}
where $\twodmrdiagpsival$ is the two body density associated to the valence electrons:
\begin{equation}
\twodmrdiagpsival = \sum_{klmn\,\,\in\,\,\basisval} \gammamnkl[\psibasis] \,\, \phix{m}{1} \phix{n}{2} \phix{k}{1} \phix{l}{2} .
\end{equation}
It is important to notice in \eqref{eq:fbasisval} the difference between the set of orbitals for the indices $(i,j)$, which span the full set of MOs within $\basis$, and the $(k,l,m,n)$, which span only the valence space $\basisval$. With such a definition, one can show (see annex) that $\fbasisval$ fulfills \eqref{eq:expectweebval} and tends to the exact interaction $1/r_{12}$ in the limit of a complete basis set $\basis$, whatever the choice of subset $\basisval$.
\subsubsection{Definition of a range-separation parameter varying in space}
To be able to approximate the complementary functional $\efuncbasisfci$ thanks to functionals developed in the field of RSDFT, we fit the effective interaction with a long-range interaction having a range-separation parameter \textit{varying in space}.
More precisely, if we define the value of the interaction at coalescence as
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:def_wcoal}
\wbasiscoal{} = W_{\psibasis}(\bfr{},\bar{{\bf X}}_{}).
\end{equation}
where $(\bfr{},\bar{{\bf X}}_{})$ means a couple of anti-parallel spins at the same point in $\bfrb{}$,
we propose a fit for each point in $\rnum^3$ of $\wbasiscoal{1}$ with a long-range-like interaction:
\begin{equation}
\wbasiscoal{} = w^{\text{lr},\murpsi}(\bfrb{},\bfrb{})
\end{equation}
where the long-range-like interaction is defined as:
\begin{equation}
w^{\text{lr},\mur}(\bfrb{1},\bfrb{2}) = \frac{ 1 }{2} \bigg( \frac{\text{erf}\big( \murr{1} \, r_{12}\big)}{r_{12}} + \frac{\text{erf}\big( \murr{2} \, r_{12}\big)}{ r_{12}}\bigg).
\end{equation}
The equation \eqref{eq:def_wcoal} is equivalent to the following condition for $\murpsi$:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:mu_of_r}
\murpsi = \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2} \, \wbasiscoal{} \, .
\end{equation}
As we defined an effective interaction for the valence electrons, we also introduce a valence range-separation parameter as
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:mu_of_r_val}
\murpsival = \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2} \, \wbasiscoalval{} \, .
\end{equation}
\subsection{Approximations for the complementary functional}
\subsubsection{General scheme}
In \cite{GinPraFerAssSavTou-JCP-18} the authors have proposed to approximate the complementary functional $\efuncbasis$ by using a specific class of SRDFT energy functionals, namely the ECMD whose general definition is:
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:ec_md_mu}
\ecmubis = & \min_{\Psi \rightarrow \denr}\elemm{\Psi}{\kinop +\weeop}{\Psi}\\-\;&\elemm{\psimu[\denr]}{\kinop+\weeop}{\psimu[\denr]},
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where the wave function $\psimu[\denr]$ is defined by the constrained minimization
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:argmin}
\psimu[\denr] = \arg \min_{\Psi \rightarrow \denr} \elemm{\Psi}{\kinop + \weeopmu}{\Psi},
\end{equation}
where $\weeopmu$ is the long-range electron-electron interaction operator
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:weemu}
\weeopmu = \frac{1}{2} \iint \text{d}{\bf r}_1 \text{d}{\bf r}_2 \; w^{\text{lr},\mu}(|{\bf r}_1 - {\bf r}_2|) \hat{n}^{(2)}({\bf r}_1,{\bf r}_2),
\end{equation}
with
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:erf}
w^{\text{lr},\mu}(|{\bf r}_1 - {\bf r}_2|) = \frac{\text{erf}(\mu |{\bf r}_1 - {\bf r}_2|)}{|{\bf r}_1 - {\bf r}_2|},
\end{equation}
and the pair-density operator $\hat{n}^{(2)}({\bf r}_1,{\bf r}_2) =\hat{n}({\bf r}_1) \hat{n}({\bf r}_2) - \delta ({\bf r}_1-{\bf r}_2) \hat{n}({\bf r}_1)$.
These functionals differ from the standard RSDFT correlation functional by the fact that the reference is not the Konh-Sham determinant but a multi determinant wave function, which makes them much more adapted in the present context where one aims at correcting the FCI energy.
The general scheme for estimating $\efuncbasis$ is the following. Consider a given approximated ECMD functional $\ecmuapprox$ labelled by ECMD-$\mathcal{X}$.
Such a functional which might depend on the density $\denr$ (and potentially its derivatives $\nabla \denr$) is defined for any value of the range-separation parameter $\mu$.
A general scheme to approximate $\efuncbasisfci$ is to use $\ecmuapprox$ with the $\mur$ defined in \eqref{eq:def_weebasis} and the FCI density $\denfci$
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:approx_ecfuncbasis}
\efuncbasisfci \approx \ecmuapproxmurfci
\end{equation}
Therefore, any approximated ECMD can be used to estimate $\efuncbasisfci$.
It is important to notice that in the limit of a complete basis set, as
\begin{equation}
\lim_{\basis \rightarrow \infty} \wbasiscoalval{} = +\infty \quad \forall\,\, \psibasis\,\,\text{and}\,\,\,{\bf r}\,,
\end{equation}
the local range separation parameter $\murpsi$ (or $\murpsival$) tends to infinity and therefore
\begin{equation}
\lim_{\basis \rightarrow \infty} \ecmuapproxmurfci = 0 \quad ,
\end{equation}
which is a condition required by the exact theory (see \eqref{eq:limitfunc}).
Also, it means that one recovers a WFT model in the limit of a complete basis set, whatever the choice of $\psibasis$, functional ECMD or density used.
\subsubsection{LDA approximation for the complementary functional}
Therefore, one can define an LDA-like functional for $\efuncbasis$ as
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:def_lda_tot}
\efuncbasislda = \int \, \text{d}{\bf r} \,\, \denr \,\, \emulda\,,
\end{equation}
where $\bar{\varepsilon}^{\text{sr},\text{unif}}_{\text{c,md}}(n,\mu)$ is the multi-determinant short-range correlation energy per particle of the uniform electron gas for which a parametrization can be found in Ref.~\onlinecite{PazMorGorBac-PRB-06}. In practice, for open-shell systems, we use the spin-polarized version of this functional (i.e., depending on the spin densities) but for simplicity we will continue to use only the notation of the spin-unpolarized case.
\subsubsection{New PBE interpolated ECMD functional}
The LDA-like functional defined in \eqref{eq:def_lda_tot} relies only on the transferability of the physics of UEG which is certainly valid for large values of $\mu$ but which is known to over correlate for small values of $\mu$.
In order to correct such a defect, we propose here a new ECMD functional inspired by the recently proposed functional of some of the present authors\cite{pbeontop} which interpolates between the usual PBE correlation functional when $\mu \rightarrow 0$ and the exact behaviour which is known when $\mu \rightarrow \infty$.
The exact behaviour of the $\ecmubis$ is known in the large $\mu$ limit\cite{pbeontop}:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:ecmd_large_mu}
\ecmubis = \frac{2\sqrt{\pi}\left(1 - \sqrt{2}\right)}{3\,\mu^3} \int \text{d}{\bf r} \,\, n^{(2)}({\bf} r)
\end{equation}
where $ n^{(2)}({\bf r}) $ is the \textit{exact} on-top pair density for the ground state of the system.
As the exact ground state on-top pair density $n^{(2)}({\bf} r)$ is not known, we propose here to approximate it by that of the UEG at the density of the system:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:ueg_ontop}
n^{(2)}({\bf} r) \approx n^{(2)}_{\text{UEG}}(n_{\uparrow}({\bf} r) , \, n_{\downarrow}({\bf} r))
\end{equation}
where $n_{\uparrow}({\bf} r)$ and $ n_{\downarrow}({\bf} r)$ are, respectively, the up and down spin densities of the physical system at ${\bf} r$, $n^{(2)}_{\text{UEG}}(n_{\uparrow} , n_{\downarrow})$ is the UEG on-top pair density
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:ueg_ontop}
n^{(2)}_{\text{UEG}}(n_{\uparrow} , n_{\downarrow}) = 4\, n_{\uparrow} \, n_{\downarrow} \, g_0(n_{\uparrow},\, n_{\downarrow})
\end{equation}
and $g_0(n_{\uparrow} ,\, n_{\downarrow})$ is the correlation factor of the UEG whose parametrization can be found in \cite{ueg_ontop}.
As the form in \eqref{eq:ecmd_large_mu} diverges for small values of $\mu$ as $1/\mu^3$, we follow the work proposed in \cite{pbeontop} and interpolate between the large-$\mu$ limit and the $\mu = 0$ limit where the $\ecmubis$ reduces to the Kohn-Sham correlation functional, for which we take the PBE approximation as in \cite{pbeontop}.
More precisely, we propose the following expression for the
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:ecmd_large_mu}
\ecmubis = \int \text{d}{\bf r} \,\, \bar{e}_{\text{c,md}}^\text{PBE}(n({\bf} r),\nabla n({\bf} r);\,\mu)
\end{equation}
with
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:epsilon_cmdpbe}
\bar{e}_{\text{c,md}}^\text{PBE}(n,\nabla n;\,\mu) = \frac{e_c^{PBE}(n,\nabla n)}{1 + \beta_{\text{c,md}\,\text{PBE}}(n,\nabla n;\,\mu)\mu^3 }
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:epsilon_cmdpbe}
\beta(n,\nabla n;\,\mu) = \frac{3 e_c^{PBE}(n,\nabla n)}{2\sqrt{\pi}\left(1 - \sqrt{2}\right)n^{(2)}_{\text{UEG}}(n_{\uparrow} , n_{\downarrow})}.
\end{equation}
Therefore, we propose this approximation for the complementary functional $\efuncbasisfci$:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:def_lda_tot}
\efuncbasispbe = \int \, \text{d}{\bf r} \,\, \bar{e}_{\text{c,md}}^\text{PBE}(n({\bf r}),\nabla n({\bf r});\,\mur)
\end{equation}
\subsection{Valence-only approximation for the complementary functional}
We now introduce a valence-only approximation for the complementary functional, which, as we shall see, performs much better than the usual approximations in the context of atomization energies.
Defining the valence one-body spin density matrix as
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\onedmval[\psibasis] & = \elemm{\psibasis}{a^{\dagger}_{i,\sigma} a_{j,\sigma}}{\psibasis} \qquad \text{if }(i,j)\in \basisval \\
& = 0 \qquad \text{in other cases}
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
then one can define the valence density as:
\begin{equation}
\denval_{\sigma}({\bf r}) = \sum_{i,j} \onedmval[\psibasis] \phi_i({\bf r}) \phi_j({\bf r})
\end{equation}
Therefore, we propose the following valence-only approximations for the complementary functional
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:def_lda_tot}
\efuncbasisldaval = \int \, \text{d}{\bf r} \,\, \denval({\bf r}) \,\, \emuldaval\,,
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:def_lda_tot}
\efuncbasispbeval = \int \, \text{d}{\bf r} \,\, \bar{e}_{\text{c,md}}^\text{PBE}(\denval({\bf r}),\nabla \denval({\bf r});\,\murval)
\end{equation}
\subsection{Generalization of the basis-set correction to any model of WFT}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Results}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection{Comparison between the CIPSI and CCSD(T) models in the case of C$_2$, N$_2$, O$_2$, F$_2$}
We begin the investigation of the behavior of the basis-set correction by the study of the atomization energies of the C$_2$, N$_2$, O$_2$, F$_2$ homo-nuclear diatomic molecules in the Dunning cc-pVXZ and cc-pCVXZ (X=D,T,Q,5) using both the CIPSI algorithm and the CCSD(T). All through this work, we follow the frozen core (FC) convention of Klopper \textit{et. al}\cite{HauKlo-JCP-12} which consists in all-electron calculations for Li-Be, a He core for B-Na atoms and a Ne core for the Al-Cl series. In the context of the DFT correction for the basis-set, this implies that, for a given system in a given basis set $\basis$, the set of valence orbitals $\basisval$ involved in the definition of the valence interaction $\wbasisval$ and density $\onedmval$ refers to all MOs except the core.
\subsubsection{CIPSI calculations and the basis-set correction}
All CIPSI calculations were performed in two steps. First, a CIPSI calculation was performed until the zeroth-order wave function reaches $10^6$ Slater determinants, from which we extracted the natural orbitals. From this set of natural orbitals, we performed CIPSI calculations until the $\EexFCIbasis$ reaches about $0.1$ mH convergence for each systems. Such convergence criterion is more than sufficient for the CIPSI densities $\dencipsi$.
Therefore, from now on, we assume that
\begin{equation}
\efci \approx \EexFCIbasis
\end{equation}
and that
\begin{equation}
\denrfci \approx \dencipsi.
\end{equation}
Regarding the wave function chosen to define the local range-separation parameter $\mur$, we take a single Slater determinant built with the natural orbitals of the first CIPSI calculation.
\subsubsection{CCSD(T) calculations and the basis-set correction}
\begin{table*}
\caption{
\label{tab:diatomics}
Dissociation energy ($\De$) in kcal/mol of the \ce{C2}, \ce{O2}, \ce{N2} and \ce{F2} molecules computed with various methods and basis sets.
}
\begin{ruledtabular}
\begin{tabular}{llddddd}
& & \mc{4}{c}{Dunning's basis set}
\\
\\
\cline{3-6}
Molecule & Method & \tabc{cc-pVDZ} & \tabc{cc-pVTZ} & \tabc{cc-pVQZ} & \tabc{cc-pV5Z} & \tabc{$E_{QZ5Z}^{\infty}$}
\\
\\
\hline
\ce{C2} & (FC)FCIQMC & 130.0(1) & 139.9(3) & 143.3(2) & & 144.9 \\
& (FC)FCIQMC+F12 & 142.3 & 145.3 & & & \\
\hline
& ex (FC)FCI & 132.0 & 140.3 & 143.6 & 144.3 & \\
\hline
& ex (FC)FCI+LDA-val & 143.0 & 145.4 & 146.4 & 146.0 & \\
& ex (FC)FCI+PBE-val & 147.4 & 146.1 & 146.4 & 145.9 & \\
& exFCI+PBE-on-top-val & 143.3 & 144.7 & 145.7 & 145.6 & \\
%%%%%%%% \hline
%%%%%%%% & ex (FC)FCI+LDA & 141.9 & 142.8 & 145.8 & 146.2 & \\
%%%%%%%% & ex (FC)FCI+PBE & 146.1 & 143.9 & 145.9 & 145.12 & \\
%%%%%%%% \hline
%%%%%%%% & exFCI+PBE-on-top& 142.7 & 142.7 & 145.3 & 144.9 & \\
\\
\cline{3-6}
& & \tabc{cc-pCVDZ} & \tabc{cc-pCVTZ} & \tabc{cc-pCVQZ} & \tabc{cc-pCV5Z} & \tabc{ $E_{CQZC5Z}^{\infty}$ }
\\
\\
\hline
%%%%%%%% & ex (FC)FC-FCI & 130.5 & 140.5 & 143.8 & 144.9 & 147.1 \\
%%%%%%%% \hline
%%%%%%%% & ex (FC)FCI+LDA & 140.9 & 145.7 & 146.6 & 146.4 & \\
%%%%%%%% & ex (FC)FCI+LDA-val & 141.3 & 145.6 & 146.5 & 146.4 & \\
%%%%%%%% \hline
%%%%%%%% & ex (FC)FCI+PBE & 144.5 & 145.9 & 146.4 & 146.3 & \\
%%%%%%%% & ex (FC)FCI+PBE -val & 145.2 & 145.9 & 146.4 & 146.3 & \\
\hline
& ex FCI & 131.0 & 141.5 & 145.1 & 146.1 & 147.1 \\
\hline
& ex FCI+LDA & 141.4 & 146.7 & 147.8 & 147.6 & \\
%%%%%%%% & ex FCI+LDA-val & 141.8 & 146.6 & 147.7 & 147.6 & \\
\hline
& ex FCI+PBE & 145.1 & 147.0 & 147.7 & 147.5 & \\
%%%%%%%% & ex FCI+PBE-val & 145.7 & 147.0 & 147.6 & 147.5 & \\
\\
\\
& & \mc{4}{c}{Dunning's basis set}
\\
\cline{3-6}
Molecule & Method & \tabc{cc-pVDZ} & \tabc{cc-pVTZ} & \tabc{cc-pVQZ} & \tabc{cc-pV5Z} & \tabc{$E_{QZ5Z}^{\infty}$}
\\
\\
\ce{N2} & ex (FC)FCI & 201.1 & 217.1 & 223.5 & 225.7 & 227.8 \\
\hline
& ex (FC)FCI+LDA-val & 217.9 & 225.9 & 228.0 & 228.6 & \\
& ex (FC)FCI+PBE-val & 227.7 & 227.8 & 228.3 & 228.5 & \\
& exFCI+PBE-on-top-val & 224.8 & 226.7 & 228.3 & 228.3 & \\
\hline
\hline
& (FC)CCSD(T) & 199.9 & 216.3 & 222.8 & 225.0 & 227.2 \\
\hline
%%%%%%%%& ex (FC)CCSD(T)+LDA & 214.7 & 221.9 & ----- & ----- & \\
%%%%%%%%& ex (FC)CCSD(T)+PBE & 223.4 & 224.3 & ----- & ----- & \\
& ex (FC)CCSD(T)+LDA-val & 216.3 & 224.8 & 227.2 & 227.8 & \\
& ex (FC)CCSD(T)+PBE-val & 225.9 & 226.7 & 227.5 & 227.8 & \\
\hline
%%%%%%%%& ex (FC)FCI+LDA & 216.4 & 223.1 & 227.9 & 228.1 & \\
%%%%%%%%& ex (FC)FCI+PBE & 225.4 & 225.6 & 228.2 & 227.9 & \\
%%%%%%%% & exFCI+PBE-on-top& 222.3 & 224.6 & 227.7 & 227.7 & \\
\\
\\
\cline{3-6}
& & \tabc{cc-pCVDZ} & \tabc{cc-pCVTZ} & \tabc{cc-pCVQZ} & \tabc{cc-pCV5Z} & \tabc{$E_{QZ5Z}^{\infty}$}
\\
\\
%%%%%%%% & ex (FC)FCI & 201.7 & 217.9 & 223.7 & 225.7 & 228.8 \\
%%%%%%%%\hline
%%%%%%%% & ex (FC)FCI+LDA & 217.5 & 226.2 & 228.4 & 228.5 & \\
%%%%%%%% & ex (FC)FCI+LDA-val & 218.5 & 226.3 & 228.4 & 228.0 & \\
%%%%%%%%\hline
%%%%%%%% & ex (FC)FCI+PBE & 225.8 & 227.6 & 228.4 & 228.3 & \\
%%%%%%%% & ex (FC)FCI+PBE-val & 227.5 & 227.7 & 228.4 & 228.0 & \\
\hline
& ex FCI & 202.2 & 218.5 & 224.4 & 226.6 & 228.8 \\
\hline
& ex FCI+LDA & 218.0 & 226.8 & 229.1 & 229.4 & \\
%%%%%%%% & ex FCI+LDA-val & 219.1 & 226.9 & 229.0 & 228.9 & \\
\hline
& ex FCI+PBE & 226.4 & 228.2 & 229.1 & 229.2 & \\
%%%%%%%% & ex FCI+PBE-val & 228.0 & 228.2 & 229.1 & 228.9 & \\
\\
\end{tabular}
\end{ruledtabular}
\fnt[1]{Results from Ref.~\onlinecite{BytLaiRuedenJCP05}.}
\fnt[2]{Results from Ref.~\onlinecite{PetTouUmr-JCP-12}.}
\end{table*}
\begin{table*}
\caption{
\label{tab:diatomics}
Dissociation energy ($\De$) in kcal/mol of the \ce{C2}, \ce{O2}, \ce{N2} and \ce{F2} molecules computed with various methods and basis sets.
}
\begin{ruledtabular}
\begin{tabular}{llddddd}
\\
\cline{3-6}
Molecule & Method & \tabc{cc-pVDZ} & \tabc{cc-pVTZ} & \tabc{cc-pVQZ} & \tabc{cc-pV5Z} & \tabc{$E_{QZ5Z}^{\infty}$}
\\
\ce{O2} & exFCI & 105.2 & 114.5 & 118.0 &119.1 & 120.0 \\
\hline
%%%%%%%% & exFCI+LDA & 111.8 & 117.2 & 120.0 &119.9 & \\
& exFCI+LDA-val & 112.4 & 118.4 & 120.2 &120.4 & \\
%%%%%%%%\hline
%%%%%%%% & exFCI+PBE & 115.9 & 118.4 & 120.1 &119.9 & \\
& exFCI+PBE-val & 117.2 & 119.4 & 120.3 &120.4 & \\
\hline
& (FC)CCSD(T) & 103.9 & 113.6 & 117.1 & 118.6 & 120.0 \\
& ex (FC)CCSD(T)+LDA-val & 110.6 & 117.2 & 119.2 & 119.8 & \\
& ex (FC)CCSD(T)+PBE-val & 115.1 & 118.0 & 119.3 & 119.8 & \\
\hline
%%%%%%%% & exFCI+PBE-on-top & 115.0 & 118.4 & 120.2 & & \\
%%%%%%%% & exFCI+PBE-on-top-val & 116.1 & 119.4 & 120.5 & & \\
\\
Molecule & Method & \tabc{cc-pVDZ} & \tabc{cc-pVTZ} & \tabc{cc-pVQZ} & \tabc{cc-pV5Z} & \tabc{$E_{QZ5Z}^{\infty}$}
\\
\ce{F2} & exFCI & 26.7 & 35.1 & 37.1 & 38.0 & 39.0 \\
\hline
%%%%%%%% & exFCI+LDA & 30.8 & 37.0 & 38.7 & 38.7 & \\
& exFCI+LDA-val & 30.4 & 37.2 & 38.4 & 38.9 & \\
%%%%%%%% \hline
%%%%%%%% & exFCI+PBE & 33.3 & 37.8 & 38.8 & 38.7 & \\
& exFCI+PBE -val & 33.1 & 37.9 & 38.5 & 38.9 & \\
\hline
%%%%%%%% & exFCI+PBE-on-top& 32.1 & 37.5 & 38.7 & 38.7 & \\
%%%%%%%% & exFCI+PBE-on-top-val & 32.4 & 37.8 & 38.8 & 38.8 & \\
\hline
& (FC)CCSD(T) & 25.7 & 34.4 & 36.5 & 37.4 & 38.2 \\
& ex (FC)CCSD(T)+LDA-val & 29.2 & 36.5 & 37.2 & 38.2 & \\
& ex (FC)CCSD(T)+PBE-val & 31.5 & 37.1 & 37.8 & 38.2 & \\
\end{tabular}
\end{ruledtabular}
\fnt[1]{Results from Ref.~\onlinecite{BytLaiRuedenJCP05}.}
\fnt[2]{Results from Ref.~\onlinecite{PetTouUmr-JCP-12}.}
\end{table*}
%
%\bibliography{G2-srDFT}
\end{document}
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink