From 27cc31d5a3e2ce0ebe1590a9744db9e2abb1bc3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Julien Toulouse Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 18:25:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] my changes --- Response_Letter/ResponseLetter.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Response_Letter/ResponseLetter.tex b/Response_Letter/ResponseLetter.tex index 432baca..58dc1d0 100644 --- a/Response_Letter/ResponseLetter.tex +++ b/Response_Letter/ResponseLetter.tex @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ We look forward to hearing from you. Removing the discussion on LDA would probably free enough space to show this, especially if Figure 2 was condensed into a single figure (which should be feasible sans LDA).} \\ \alert{This is an excellent suggestion. - We have reported a figure showing $\mu(\bm{r})$ for \ce{N2} in various basis sets. + We have reported a figure showing $\mu(\bm{r})$ and the associated energetic correction for \ce{N2} in various basis sets. A short discussion has also been included.} \item