loos/srDFT_Ex
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Minor changes toto

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Anthony Scemama 2019-07-01 11:16:30 +02:00
parent 3b5b2771e1
commit 84ba72c4d2
1 changed files with 12 additions and 10 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

18
Manuscript/Ex-srDFT.tex
View File

@ -178,7 +178,7 @@
\begin{abstract}
By combining extrapolated selected configuration interaction (sCI) energies obtained with the CIPSI (Configuration Interaction using a Perturbative Selection made Iteratively) algorithm with the recently proposed short-range density-functional correction for basis-set incompleteness [\href{https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5052714}{Giner \textit{et al.}, \textit{J.~Chem.~Phys.}~\textbf{149}, 194301 (2018)}], we show that one can get chemically accurate vertical and adiabatic excitation energies with, typically, augmented double-$\zeta$ basis sets.
We illustrate the present approach on various types of excited states (valence, Rydberg, and double excitations) in several small organic molecules (methylene, water, ammonia, carbon monoxide, carbon dimer and ethylene).
The present study clearly evidences that special care has to be taken with very diffuse excited states where the present correction might not be enough to catch the radial incompleteness of the one-electron basis set.
The present study clearly evidences that special care has to be taken with very diffuse excited states where the present correction \toto{does not} catch the radial incompleteness of the one-electron basis set.
\end{abstract}
@ -193,10 +193,10 @@ The overall basis-set incompleteness error can be, qualitatively at least, split
Although for ground-state properties angular incompleteness is by far the main source of error, it is definitely not unusual to have a significant radial incompleteness in the case of excited states (especially for Rydberg states), which can be alleviated by using additional sets of diffuse basis functions (i.e.~augmented basis sets). \jt{JTcomment: shouldn't we cite references for this first paragraph?}
Explicitly-correlated F12 methods \cite{Kut-TCA-85, Kut-TCA-85, KutKlo-JCP-91, NogKut-JCP-94} have been specifically designed to efficiently catch angular incompleteness. \cite{Ten-TCA-12, TenNog-WIREs-12, HatKloKohTew-CR-12, KonBisVal-CR-12, GruHirOhnTen-JCP-17, MaWer-WIREs-18}
Although they have been extremely successful to speed up convergence of ground-state energies and properties, such as correlation and atomization energies, \cite{TewKloNeiHat-PCCP-07} their performances for excited states \cite{FliHatKlo-JCP-06, NeiHatKlo-JCP-06, HanKoh-JCP-09, Koh-JCP-09, ShiWer-JCP-10, ShiKniWer-JCP-11, ShiWer-JCP-11, ShiWer-MP-13} have been much more conflicting. \cite{FliHatKlo-JCP-06, NeiHatKlo-JCP-06}
Although they have been extremely successful to speed up convergence of ground-state energies and properties, such as correlation and atomization energies, \cite{TewKloNeiHat-PCCP-07} their \toto{performance} for excited states \cite{FliHatKlo-JCP-06, NeiHatKlo-JCP-06, HanKoh-JCP-09, Koh-JCP-09, ShiWer-JCP-10, ShiKniWer-JCP-11, ShiWer-JCP-11, ShiWer-MP-13} has been much more conflicting. \cite{FliHatKlo-JCP-06, NeiHatKlo-JCP-06}
Instead of F12 methods, here we propose to follow a different route and investigate the performance of the recently proposed density-based basis set
incompleteness correction. \cite{GinPraFerAssSavTou-JCP-18}
incompleteness correction. \cite{GinPraFerAssSavTou-JCP-18}
Contrary to our recent study on atomization and correlation energies, \cite{LooPraSceTouGin-JPCL-19} the present contribution focuses on vertical and adiabatic excitation energies in molecular systems which is a much tougher test for the reasons mentioned above.
This density-based correction relies on short-range correlation density functionals (with multideterminant reference) from range-separated density-functional theory \cite{Sav-INC-96, LeiStoWerSav-CPL-97, TouColSav-PRA-04, TouSavFla-IJQC-04, AngGerSavTou-PRA-05, GolWerSto-PCCP-05, PazMorGorBac-PRB-06, FroTouJen-JCP-07, TouGerJanSavAng-PRL-09, JanHenScu-JCP-09, FroCimJen-PRA-10, TouZhuSavJanAng-JCP-11, MusReiAngTou-JCP-15, HedKneKieJenRei-JCP-15, HedTouJen-JCP-18, FerGinTou-JCP-19} (RS-DFT) to capture the missing part of the short-range correlation effects, a consequence of the incompleteness of the one-electron basis set.
Because RS-DFT combines rigorously density-functional theory (DFT) \cite{ParYan-BOOK-89} and wave function theory (WFT) \cite{SzaOst-BOOK-96} via a decomposition of the electron-electron interaction into a non-divergent long-range part and a (complementary) short-range part (treated with WFT and DFT, respectively), the WFT method is relieved from describing the short-range part of the correlation hole around the electron-electron coalescence points (cusp).
@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ its basis-set correction.
An important property of the present correction is
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:limitfunc}
\lim_{\Bas \to \CBS} \DbE{}{\Bas}[\n{0}{\Bas},\n{k}{\Bas}] = 0.
\lim_{\Bas \to \CBS} \DbE{}{\Bas}[\n{0}{\Bas},\n{k}{\Bas}] = 0.
\end{equation}
In other words, the correction vanishes in the CBS limit, hence guaranteeing an unaltered limit. \cite{LooPraSceTouGin-JPCL-19}
%In the following, we will drop the state index $k$ and focus on the quantity $\bE{}{\Bas}[\n{}{}]$.
@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ In this regime, the ECMD energy
\label{eq:exact_large_mu}
\bE{\text{c,md}}{\sr} = \frac{2\sqrt{\pi} (1 - \sqrt{2})}{3\mu^3} \int \dbr{} \n{2}{}(\br{}) + \order*{\mu^{-4}}
\end{align}
only depends on the \textit{exact} on-top pair density $\n{2}{}(\br{}) \equiv \n{2}{}(\br{},\br{})$ which is obtained from the \textit{exact} ground-state wave function $\Psi$ belonging to the many-electron Hilbert space in the CBS limit.
only depends on the \textit{exact} on-top pair density $\n{2}{}(\br{}) \equiv \n{2}{}(\br{},\br{})$ which is obtained from the \textit{exact} ground-state wave function $\Psi$ belonging to the many-electron Hilbert space in the CBS limit.
Obviously, an exact quantity such as $\n{2}{}(\br{})$ is out of reach in practical calculations and must be approximated by a function referred here as $\tn{2}{}(\br{})$.
For a given $\tn{2}{}(\br{})$, some of the authors proposed the following functional form in order to interpolate between $\e{\text{c}}{\PBE}(\n{}{},s,\zeta)$ at $\mu = 0$ and Eq.~\eqref{eq:exact_large_mu} as $\mu \to \infty$: \cite{FerGinTou-JCP-19}
@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ These energies will be labeled exFCI in the following.
Using near-FCI excitation energies (within a given basis set) has the indisputable advantage to remove the error inherent to the WFT method.
Indeed, in the present case, the only source of error on the excitation energies is due to basis-set incompleteness.
We refer the interested reader to Refs.~\onlinecite{HolUmrSha-JCP-17, SceGarCafLoo-JCTC-18, LooSceBloGarCafJac-JCTC-18, SceBenJacCafLoo-JCP-18, LooBogSceCafJac-JCTC-19, QP2} for more details.
The one-electron densities and on-top pair densities are computed from a very large CIPSI expansion containing up to several millions of Slater determinants.
The one-electron densities and on-top pair densities are computed from a very large CIPSI expansion containing up to several \toto{million} of Slater determinants.
All the RS-DFT and exFCI calculations have been performed with {\QP}. \cite{QP2}
For the numerical quadratures, we employ the SG-2 grid. \cite{DasHer-JCC-17}
Except for methylene for which FCI/TZVP geometries have been taken from Ref.~\onlinecite{SheLeiVanSch-JCP-98}, the other molecular geometries have been extracted from Refs.~\onlinecite{LooSceBloGarCafJac-JCTC-18, LooBogSceCafJac-JCTC-19} and have been obtained at the CC3/aug-cc-pVTZ level of theory.
@ -429,9 +429,11 @@ Due to its relative small size, its ground and excited states have been thorough
As a first test of the present density-based basis-set correction, we consider the four lowest-lying states of methylene ($1\,^{3}B_1$, $1\,^{1}A_1$, $1\,^{1}B_1$ and $2\,^{1}A_1$) at their respective equilibrium geometry and compute the corresponding adiabatic transition energies for basis sets ranging from AVDZ to AVQZ.
We have also computed total energies at the exFCI/AV5Z level and used these alongside the quadruple-$\zeta$ ones to extrapolate the total energies to the CBS limit with the usual extrapolation formula \cite{HelJorOls-BOOK-02}
\toto{
\begin{equation}
\E{}{\text{AVXZ}} = \E{}{\CBS} + \frac{\alpha}{(\tX+1/2)^{3}}.
\E{}{\text{AVXZ}}(\tX) = \E{}{\CBS} + \frac{\alpha}{(\tX+1/2)^{3}}.
\end{equation}
}
\jt{JTcomment: did you really use this $(X+1/2)^{-3}$ formula and not the simpler $X^{-3}$? I think it is not clear that the $(X+1/2)^{-3}$ formula is better.}
These results are illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:CH2} and reported in Table \ref{tab:CH2} alongside reference values from the literature obtained with various deterministic and stochastic approaches. \cite{ChiHolAdaOttUmrShaZim-JPCA-18, SheLeiVanSch-JCP-98, JenBun-JCP-88, SheLeiVanSch-JCP-98, ZimTouZhaMusUmr-JCP-09}
@ -574,7 +576,7 @@ These results are also depicted in Figs.~\ref{fig:H2O} and \ref{fig:NH3} for \ce
One would have noticed that the basis-set effects are particularly strong for the third singlet excited state of water \jt{JTcomment: In fact, it seems that the third singlet excited state of water has a weaker basis set effects than the other states when going from AVDZ to AVTZ! I guess that the point was that there is subtantial error remaining for AVQZ. If so, we should be more explicit in the text. Are we sure that this comes from the fact that this state is particularly diffuse? In principle, it could also come from error in the TBE.} and the third and fourth singlet excited states of ammonia where this effect is even magnified.
In these cases, one really needs doubly augmented basis sets to reach radial completeness.
The first observation worth reporting is that all three RS-DFT correlation functionals have very similar behaviors and they significantly reduce the error on the excitation energies for most of the states.
However, these results also clearly evidence that special care has to be taken for very diffuse excited states where the present correction might not be enough to catch the radial incompleteness of the one-electron basis set, a feature which is far from being a cusp-related effect.
However, these results also clearly evidence that special care has to be taken for very diffuse excited states where the present correction \toto{cannot} catch the radial incompleteness of the one-electron basis set, a feature which is far from being a cusp-related effect.
%%% TABLE 2 %%%