1st part paper OK
This commit is contained in:
parent
92fe84d59c
commit
31381f29aa
@ -224,8 +224,8 @@ is the basis-dependent complementary density functional,
|
||||
&
|
||||
\hWee{} & = \sum_{i<j}^{\Ne} r_{ij}^{-1},
|
||||
\end{align}
|
||||
are the kinetic and interelectronic repulsion operators, respectively, and $\wf{}{\Bas}$ and $\wf{}{}$ are two general $\Ne$-electron normalized wave functions belonging to the Hilbert space spanned by $\Bas$ and the complete basis set, respectively.
|
||||
The notation $\wf{}{} \rightsquigarrow \n{}{}$ states that $\wf{}{}$ yield the density $\n{}{}$.
|
||||
are the kinetic and electron-electron repulsion operators, respectively, and $\wf{}{\Bas}$ and $\wf{}{}$ are two general $\Ne$-electron normalized wave functions belonging to the Hilbert space spanned by $\Bas$ and the complete basis set, respectively.
|
||||
The notation $\wf{}{} \rightsquigarrow \n{}{}$ in Eq.~\eqref{eq:E_funcbasis} states that $\wf{}{}$ yields the one-electron density $\n{}{}$.
|
||||
|
||||
Hence, the CBS excitation energy associated with the $k$th excited state reads
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ An important property of the present correction is
|
||||
\lim_{\Bas \to \CBS} \DbE{}{\Bas}[\n{0}{\Bas},\n{k}{\Bas}] = 0.
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
In other words, the correction vanishes in the CBS limit, hence guaranteeing an unaltered CBS limit. \cite{LooPraSceTouGin-JPCL-19}
|
||||
%In the following, we will drop the state index $k$ and focus on the quantity $\bE{}{\Bas}[\n{}{}]$.
|
||||
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
\subsection{Range-separation function}
|
||||
@ -265,8 +266,9 @@ The ECMD functionals admit, for any $\n{}{}$, the following two limits
|
||||
where $\Ec[\n{}{}]$ is the usual universal correlation density functional defined in Kohn-Sham DFT. \cite{HohKoh-PR-64, KohSha-PR-65}
|
||||
|
||||
The key ingredient --- the range-separated function $\rsmu{}{\Bas}(\br{})$ --- automatically adapts to the spatial non-homogeneity of the basis set incompleteness error.
|
||||
It is defined such that the long-range interaction of RS-DFT, $\w{}{\lr,\mu}(r_{12}) = \erf( \mu r_{12})/r_{12}$, coincides, at coalescence, with an effective two-electron interaction $\W{}{\Bas}(\br{1},\br{2})$ ``mimicking'' the Coulomb operator in an incomplete basis $\Bas$, i.e.~$\w{}{\lr,\rsmu{}{\Bas}(\br{})}(0) = \W{}{\Bas}(\br{},\br{})$ at any $\br{}$, with \cite{GinPraFerAssSavTou-JCP-18}
|
||||
\begin{gather}
|
||||
It is defined such that the long-range interaction of RS-DFT, $\w{}{\lr,\mu}(r_{12}) = \erf( \mu r_{12})/r_{12}$, coincides, at coalescence, with an effective two-electron interaction $\W{}{\Bas}(\br{1},\br{2})$ ``mimicking'' the Coulomb operator in an incomplete basis $\Bas$, i.e.~$\w{}{\lr,\rsmu{}{\Bas}(\br{})}(0) = \W{}{\Bas}(\br{},\br{})$ at any $\br{}$. \cite{GinPraFerAssSavTou-JCP-18}
|
||||
The explicit expression of $\W{}{\Bas}(\br{1},\br{2})$ is given by
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eq:def_weebasis}
|
||||
\W{}{\Bas}(\br{1},\br{2}) =
|
||||
\begin{cases}
|
||||
@ -274,11 +276,13 @@ It is defined such that the long-range interaction of RS-DFT, $\w{}{\lr,\mu}(r_{
|
||||
\\
|
||||
\infty, & \text{otherwise,}
|
||||
\end{cases}
|
||||
\\
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
where
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eq:n2basis}
|
||||
\n{2}{\Bas}(\br{1},\br{2})
|
||||
= \sum_{pqrs \in \Bas} \SO{p}{1} \SO{q}{2} \Gam{pq}{rs} \SO{r}{1} \SO{s}{2},
|
||||
\end{gather}
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
and $\Gam{pq}{rs} = 2 \mel*{\wf{}{\Bas}}{ \aic{r_\downarrow}\aic{s_\uparrow}\ai{q_\uparrow}\ai{p_\downarrow}}{\wf{}{\Bas}}$ are the opposite-spin pair density associated with $\wf{}{\Bas}$ and its corresponding tensor, respectively, $\SO{p}{}$ is a (real-valued) molecular orbital (MO),
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eq:fbasis}
|
||||
@ -307,7 +311,7 @@ To go beyond the LDA and cure its over correlation at small $\mu$, some of the a
|
||||
\int \n{}{}(\br{}) \be{\text{c,md}}{\sr,\PBE}\qty(\n{}{}(\br{}),s(\br{}),\zeta(\br{}),\rsmu{}{\Bas}(\br{})) \dbr{},
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
where $s = \abs{\nabla \n{}{}}/\n{}{4/3}$ is the reduced density gradient.
|
||||
$\be{\text{c,md}}{\sr,\PBE}\qty(\n{}{},s,\zeta,\rsmu{}{})$ interpolates between the usual PBE correlation functional, \cite{PerBurErn-PRL-96} $\e{\text{c}}{\PBE}(\n{}{},s,\zeta)$, at $\rsmu{}{}=0$ and the exact large-$\rsmu{}{}$ behavior. \cite{TouColSav-PRA-04, GorSav-PRA-06, PazMorGorBac-PRB-06}
|
||||
$\be{\text{c,md}}{\sr,\PBE}\qty(\n{}{},s,\zeta,\rsmu{}{})$ interpolates between the usual PBE correlation functional, \cite{PerBurErn-PRL-96} $\e{\text{c}}{\PBE}(\n{}{},s,\zeta)$, at $\rsmu{}{} = 0$ (DFT limit) and the exact large-$\rsmu{}{}$ behavior (WFT limit). \cite{TouColSav-PRA-04, GorSav-PRA-06, PazMorGorBac-PRB-06}
|
||||
It reads
|
||||
\begin{subequations}
|
||||
\begin{gather}
|
||||
@ -328,7 +332,7 @@ This computationally-lighter functional will be refered to as PBE.
|
||||
\label{sec:compdetails}
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
In the present study, we compute the ground- and excited-state energies, one-electron and on-top densities with a selected CI method known as CIPSI (Configuration Interaction using a Perturbative Selection made Iteratively). \cite{HurMalRan-JCP-73, GinSceCaf-CJC-13, GinSceCaf-JCP-15}
|
||||
The total energy of each state is obtained via an efficient extrapolation procedure of the sCI energies designed to reach near-FCI energies. \cite{QP2}
|
||||
The total energy of each state is obtained via an efficient extrapolation procedure of the sCI energies designed to reach near-FCI accuracy. \cite{QP2}
|
||||
These energies will be labeled exFCI in the following.
|
||||
We refer the interested reader to Refs.~\onlinecite{HolUmrSha-JCP-17, SceGarCafLoo-JCTC-18, LooSceBloGarCafJac-JCTC-18, SceBenJacCafLoo-JCP-18, LooBogSceCafJAc-JCTC-19, QP2} for more details.
|
||||
The one-electron and on-top densities are computed from a very large CIPSI expansion containing several million determinants.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user