\documentclass[aip,jcp,preprint,noshowkeys,superscriptaddress]{revtex4-1} \usepackage{graphicx,dcolumn,bm,xcolor,microtype,multirow,amscd,amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts,physics,wrapfig,txfonts} \usepackage[version=4]{mhchem} %\usepackage{natbib} %\bibliographystyle{achemso} \newcommand{\ie}{\textit{i.e.}} \newcommand{\eg}{\textit{e.g.}} \newcommand{\alert}[1]{\textcolor{black}{#1}} \usepackage[normalem]{ulem} \newcommand{\titou}[1]{\textcolor{red}{#1}} \newcommand{\trashPFL}[1]{\textcolor{red}{\sout{#1}}} \newcommand{\PFL}[1]{\titou{(\underline{\bf PFL}: #1)}} \newcommand{\toto}[1]{\textcolor{green}{#1}} \newcommand{\trashAS}[1]{\textcolor{green}{\sout{#1}}} \newcommand{\AS}[1]{\toto{(\underline{\bf AS}: #1)}} \newcommand{\ant}[1]{\textcolor{orange}{#1}} \newcommand{\SI}{\textcolor{blue}{Supporting Information}} \newcommand{\mc}{\multicolumn} \newcommand{\fnm}{\footnotemark} \newcommand{\fnt}{\footnotetext} \newcommand{\tabc}[1]{\multicolumn{1}{c}{#1}} \newcommand{\QP}{\textsc{quantum package}} \newcommand{\EHF}{E_\text{HF}} \newcommand{\EDOCI}{E_\text{DOCI}} \newcommand{\EFCI}{E_\text{FCI}} \renewcommand{\thesection}{S\arabic{section}} \renewcommand{\thetable}{S\arabic{table}} \renewcommand{\thefigure}{S\arabic{figure}} \renewcommand{\theequation}{S\arabic{equation}} \usepackage[ colorlinks=true, citecolor=blue, breaklinks=true ]{hyperref} \urlstyle{same} \begin{document} \newcommand{\LCPQ}{Laboratoire de Chimie et Physique Quantiques (UMR 5626), Universit\'e de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, France} \title{Hierarchy Configuration Interaction: Combining Seniority Number and Excitation Degree} \author{F\'abris Kossoski} \email{fkossoski@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr} \affiliation{\LCPQ} \author{Yann Damour} \affiliation{\LCPQ} \author{Pierre-Fran\c{c}ois Loos} \email{loos@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr} \affiliation{\LCPQ} % Abstract \begin{abstract} %Here comes the abstract. %\bigskip %\begin{center} % \boxed{\includegraphics[width=0.4\linewidth]{TOC}} %\end{center} %\bigskip \end{abstract} % Title \maketitle %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %\section{\ce{Computational details}} %\label{sec:comp_details} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %\vspace{20cm} %x %\newpage %x %\newpage %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %\section{oo-CI} %\label{sec:oo-CI} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{plot_stat_opt} \caption{Non-parallelity errors as function of the number of determinants, for the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with orbitals optimized at each CI level. } \label{fig:plot_stat_opt} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{plot_distance_opt} \caption{Distance errors as function of the number of determinants, for the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with orbitals optimized at each CI level. } \label{fig:plot_distance_opt} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{xe_opt} \caption{Equilibrium geometries as function of the number of determinants, for the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with orbitals optimized at each CI level. } \label{fig:xe_opt} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{freq_opt} \caption{Vibrational frequencies (or force constants) as function of the number of determinants, for the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with orbitals optimized at each CI level. } \label{fig:freq_opt} \end{figure} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %\section{oo-CIS %\label{sec:oo-CIS} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{plot_pes} \caption{Potential energy curves for dissociation of six molecular systems (see main text for details), according to RHF (gray), oo-CIS (red), and FCI (black) calculations. } \label{fig:plot_pes} \end{figure} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %\section{\ce{HF}, different basis sets} %\label{sec:HF_basis} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{plot_pes_HF} \caption{Potential energy curves (top) and energy differences with respect to FCI (bottom), for dissociation of \ce{HF}, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals, and for the cc-pVDZ (left), cc-pVTZ (center), and cc-pVQZ (right) basis sets. } \label{fig:plot_pes_HF} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{freq_HF} \caption{Non-parallelity error (left), vibrational frequencies (center), and equilibrium geometries (right) of \ce{HF}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals, and for the cc-pVDZ (left), cc-pVTZ (center), and cc-pVQZ (right) basis sets.} \label{fig:freq_HF} \end{figure} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %\section{\ce{HF}} %\label{sec:HF} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{HF_pes} \caption{Potential energy curves for \ce{HF}, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), (dashed lines for half-integer $h$), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:HF_pes} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{HF_pes_error} \caption{Energy differences between the potential energy curves of Fig.~\ref{fig:HF_pes} and FCI results for \ce{HF}, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), (dashed lines for half-integer $h$), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:HF_pes_error} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{HF_npe} \caption{Non-parallelity error for \ce{HF}, corresponding to the potential energy curves of Fig.~\ref{fig:HF_pes}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:HF_npe} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{HF_distance} \caption{Distance error for \ce{HF}, corresponding to the potential energy curves of Fig.~\ref{fig:HF_pes}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:HF_distance} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{HF_freq} \caption{Vibrational frequency of \ce{HF}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:HF_freq} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{HF_xe} \caption{Equilibrium bond length of \ce{HF}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:HF_xe} \end{figure} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %\section{\ce{F2}} %\label{sec:F2} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{F2_pes} \caption{Potential energy curves for \ce{F2}, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), (dashed lines for half-integer $h$), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:F2_pes} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{F2_pes_error} \caption{Energy differences between the potential energy curves of Fig.~\ref{fig:F2_pes} and FCI results for \ce{F2}, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), (dashed lines for half-integer $h$), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:F2_pes_error} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{F2_npe} \caption{Non-parallelity error for \ce{F2}, corresponding to the potential energy curves of Fig.~\ref{fig:F2_pes}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:F2_npe} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{F2_distance} \caption{Distance error for \ce{F2}, corresponding to the potential energy curves of Fig.~\ref{fig:F2_pes}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:F2_distance} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{F2_freq} \caption{Vibrational frequency of \ce{F2}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:F2_freq} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{F2_xe} \caption{Equilibrium bond length of \ce{F2}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:F2_xe} \end{figure} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %\section{\ce{Ethylene}} %\label{sec:ethylene} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ethylene_pes} \caption{Potential energy curves for \ce{ethylene}, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), (dashed lines for half-integer $h$), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:ethylene_pes} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ethylene_pes_error} \caption{Energy differences between the potential energy curves of Fig.~\ref{fig:ethylene_pes} and FCI results for \ce{ethylene}, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), (dashed lines for half-integer $h$), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:ethylene_pes_error} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ethylene_npe} \caption{Non-parallelity error for \ce{ethylene}, corresponding to the potential energy curves of Fig.~\ref{fig:ethylene_pes}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:ethylene_npe} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ethylene_distance} \caption{Distance error for \ce{ethylene}, corresponding to the potential energy curves of Fig.~\ref{fig:ethylene_pes}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:ethylene_distance} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ethylene_freq} \caption{Vibrational frequency of \ce{ethylene}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:ethylene_freq} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ethylene_xe} \caption{Equilibrium bond length of \ce{ethylene}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:ethylene_xe} \end{figure} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %\section{\ce{N2}} %\label{sec:N2} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{N2_pes} \caption{Potential energy curves for \ce{N2}, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), (dashed lines for half-integer $h$), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:N2_pes} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{N2_pes_error} \caption{Energy differences between the potential energy curves of Fig.~\ref{fig:N2_pes} and FCI results for \ce{N2}, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), (dashed lines for half-integer $h$), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:N2_pes_error} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{N2_npe} \caption{Non-parallelity error for \ce{N2}, corresponding to the potential energy curves of Fig.~\ref{fig:N2_pes}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:N2_npe} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{N2_distance} \caption{Distance error for \ce{N2}, corresponding to the potential energy curves of Fig.~\ref{fig:N2_pes}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:N2_distance} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{N2_freq} \caption{Vibrational frequency of \ce{N2}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:N2_freq} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{N2_xe} \caption{Equilibrium bond length of \ce{N2}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:N2_xe} \end{figure} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %\section{\ce{H4}} %\label{sec:H4} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{H4_pes} \caption{Potential energy curves for \ce{H4}, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), (dashed lines for half-integer $h$), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:H4_pes} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{H4_pes_error} \caption{Energy differences between the potential energy curves of Fig.~\ref{fig:H4_pes} and FCI results for \ce{H4}, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), (dashed lines for half-integer $h$), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:H4_pes_error} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{H4_npe} \caption{Non-parallelity error for \ce{H4}, corresponding to the potential energy curves of Fig.~\ref{fig:H4_pes}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:H4_npe} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{H4_distance} \caption{Distance error for \ce{H4}, corresponding to the potential energy curves of Fig.~\ref{fig:H4_pes}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:H4_distance} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{H4_force} \caption{Force constants for symmetric dissociation of \ce{H4}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:H4_force} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{H4_xe} \caption{Equilibrium bond length of \ce{H4}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:H4_xe} \end{figure} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %\section{\ce{H8}} %\label{sec:H8} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{H8_pes} \caption{Potential energy curves for \ce{H8}, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), (dashed lines for half-integer $h$), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:H8_pes} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{H8_pes_error} \caption{Energy differences between the potential energy curves of Fig.~\ref{fig:H8_pes} and FCI results for \ce{H8}, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), (dashed lines for half-integer $h$), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:H8_pes_error} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{H8_npe} \caption{Non-parallelity error for \ce{H8}, corresponding to the potential energy curves of Fig.~\ref{fig:H8_pes}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:H8_npe} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{H8_distance} \caption{Distance error for \ce{H8}, corresponding to the potential energy curves of Fig.~\ref{fig:H8_pes}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:H8_distance} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{H8_force} \caption{Force constants for symmetric dissociation of \ce{H8}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:H8_force} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{H8_xe} \caption{Equilibrium bond length of \ce{H8}, as function of the number of determinants, according to the three classes of CI methods: seniority-based CI (blue), excitation-based CI (red), and hierarchy-based CI (green), with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized at a given level of CI (right), and with the cc-pVDZ basis set.} \label{fig:H8_xe} \end{figure} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %\bibliography{seniority} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \end{document}