398 lines
15 KiB
TeX
398 lines
15 KiB
TeX
|
\documentclass[aip,jcp,preprint,noshowkeys,superscriptaddress]{revtex4-1}
|
||
|
\usepackage{graphicx,dcolumn,bm,xcolor,microtype,multirow,amscd,amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts,physics,wrapfig,txfonts}
|
||
|
\usepackage[version=4]{mhchem}
|
||
|
%\usepackage{natbib}
|
||
|
%\bibliographystyle{achemso}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\newcommand{\ie}{\textit{i.e.}}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\eg}{\textit{e.g.}}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\alert}[1]{\textcolor{black}{#1}}
|
||
|
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\titou}[1]{\textcolor{red}{#1}}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\trashPFL}[1]{\textcolor{red}{\sout{#1}}}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\PFL}[1]{\titou{(\underline{\bf PFL}: #1)}}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\toto}[1]{\textcolor{green}{#1}}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\trashAS}[1]{\textcolor{green}{\sout{#1}}}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\AS}[1]{\toto{(\underline{\bf AS}: #1)}}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\ant}[1]{\textcolor{orange}{#1}}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\SI}{\textcolor{blue}{Supporting Information}}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\newcommand{\mc}{\multicolumn}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\fnm}{\footnotemark}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\fnt}{\footnotetext}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\tabc}[1]{\multicolumn{1}{c}{#1}}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\QP}{\textsc{quantum package}}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\newcommand{\hI}{\Hat{1}}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\hT}{\Hat{T}}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\hH}{\Hat{H}}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\bH}{\Bar{H}}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\ERI}[2]{v_{#1}^{#2}}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\newcommand{\EHF}{E_\text{HF}}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\EDOCI}{E_\text{DOCI}}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\EFCI}{E_\text{FCI}}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\ECC}{E_\text{CC}}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\EVCC}{E_\text{VCC}}
|
||
|
\newcommand{\EpCCD}{E_\text{pCCD}}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\newcommand{\si}{\sigma}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\renewcommand{\thesection}{S\arabic{section}}
|
||
|
\renewcommand{\thetable}{S\arabic{table}}
|
||
|
\renewcommand{\thefigure}{S\arabic{figure}}
|
||
|
\renewcommand{\theequation}{S\arabic{equation}}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\usepackage[
|
||
|
colorlinks=true,
|
||
|
citecolor=blue,
|
||
|
breaklinks=true
|
||
|
]{hyperref}
|
||
|
\urlstyle{same}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{document}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\newcommand{\LCPQ}{Laboratoire de Chimie et Physique Quantiques (UMR 5626), Universit\'e de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, France}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\title{Configuration interaction with seniority and excitation degree}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\author{F\'abris Kossoski}
|
||
|
\email{fkossoski@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr}
|
||
|
\affiliation{\LCPQ}
|
||
|
\author{Pierre-Fran\c{c}ois Loos}
|
||
|
\email{loos@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr}
|
||
|
\affiliation{\LCPQ}
|
||
|
|
||
|
% Abstract
|
||
|
\begin{abstract}
|
||
|
%Here comes the abstract.
|
||
|
%\bigskip
|
||
|
%\begin{center}
|
||
|
% \boxed{\includegraphics[width=0.4\linewidth]{TOC}}
|
||
|
%\end{center}
|
||
|
%\bigskip
|
||
|
\end{abstract}
|
||
|
|
||
|
% Title
|
||
|
\maketitle
|
||
|
|
||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
%\section{\ce{Computational details}}
|
||
|
%\label{sec:comp_details}
|
||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
|
||
|
%\vspace{20cm}
|
||
|
%x
|
||
|
%\newpage
|
||
|
%x
|
||
|
%\newpage
|
||
|
|
||
|
%Start.
|
||
|
|
||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
%\section{\ce{H4}}
|
||
|
%\label{sec:H4}
|
||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{h4_pes}
|
||
|
\caption{Potential energy curves for linear \ce{H4}, as function of the symmetric stretching coordinate,
|
||
|
computed with different CI methods and the cc-pvdz basis set,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right).}
|
||
|
\label{fig:h4_pes}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{h4_pes_error}
|
||
|
\caption{Energy difference to the FCI results for linear \ce{H4}, as function of the symmetric stretching coordinate,
|
||
|
computed with different CI methods and the cc-pvdz basis set,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right).}
|
||
|
\label{fig:h4_pes_error}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{h4_pes_stat}
|
||
|
\caption{Nonparallelity error for linear \ce{H4},
|
||
|
as function of the computational scaling of excitation-based CI (red) and CIo (green) methods,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right), for the cc-pvdz basis set.}
|
||
|
\label{fig:h4_pes_stat}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{h4_xe}
|
||
|
\caption{Equilibrium bond length of linear \ce{H4},
|
||
|
as function of the computational scaling of excitation-based CI (red) and CIo (green) methods,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right), for the cc-pvtz basis set.}
|
||
|
\label{fig:h4_xe}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
%\section{\ce{H8}}
|
||
|
%\label{sec:H8}
|
||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{h8_pes}
|
||
|
\caption{Potential energy curves for linear \ce{H8}, as function of the symmetric stretching coordinate,
|
||
|
computed with different CI methods and the cc-pvdz basis set,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right).}
|
||
|
\label{fig:h8_pes}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{h8_pes_error}
|
||
|
\caption{Energy difference to the FCI results for linear \ce{H8}, as function of the symmetric stretching coordinate,
|
||
|
computed with different CI methods and the cc-pvdz basis set,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right).}
|
||
|
\label{fig:h8_pes_error}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{h8_pes_stat}
|
||
|
\caption{Nonparallelity error for linear \ce{H8},
|
||
|
as function of the computational scaling of excitation-based CI (red) and CIo (green) methods,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right), for the cc-pvdz basis set.}
|
||
|
\label{fig:h8_pes_stat}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{h8_xe}
|
||
|
\caption{Equilibrium bond length of linear \ce{H8},
|
||
|
as function of the computational scaling of excitation-based CI (red) and CIo (green) methods,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right), for the cc-pvtz basis set.}
|
||
|
\label{fig:h8_xe}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
%\section{\ce{H2O}}
|
||
|
%\label{sec:H2O}
|
||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{h2o_pes}
|
||
|
\caption{Potential energy curves for \ce{H2O}, as function of the symmetric O$-$H distance,
|
||
|
computed with different CI methods and the cc-pvdz basis set,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right).}
|
||
|
\label{fig:h2o_pes}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{h2o_pes_error}
|
||
|
\caption{Energy difference to the FCI results for \ce{H2O}, as function of the symmetric O$-$H distance,
|
||
|
computed with different CI methods and the cc-pvdz basis set,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right).}
|
||
|
\label{fig:h2o_pes_error}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{h2o_pes_stat}
|
||
|
\caption{Nonparallelity error for \ce{H2O},
|
||
|
as function of the computational scaling of excitation-based CI (red) and CIo (green) methods,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right), for the cc-pvdz basis set.}
|
||
|
\label{fig:h2o_pes_stat}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{h2o_xe}
|
||
|
\caption{Equilibrium bond length of \ce{H2O},
|
||
|
as function of the computational scaling of excitation-based CI (red) and CIo (green) methods,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right), for the cc-pvtz basis set.}
|
||
|
\label{fig:h2o_xe}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
%\section{\ce{N2}}
|
||
|
%\label{sec:N2}
|
||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{n2_pes}
|
||
|
\caption{Potential energy curves for \ce{N2},
|
||
|
computed with different CI methods and the cc-pvdz basis set,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right).}
|
||
|
\label{fig:n2_pes}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{n2_pes_error}
|
||
|
\caption{Energy difference to the FCI results for \ce{N2},
|
||
|
computed with different CI methods and the cc-pvdz basis set,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right).}
|
||
|
\label{fig:n2_pes_error}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{n2_pes_stat}
|
||
|
\caption{Nonparallelity error for \ce{N2},
|
||
|
as function of the computational scaling of excitation-based CI (red) and CIo (green) methods,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right), for the cc-pvdz basis set.}
|
||
|
\label{fig:n2_pes_stat}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{n2_xe}
|
||
|
\caption{Equilibrium bond length of \ce{N2},
|
||
|
as function of the computational scaling of excitation-based CI (red) and CIo (green) methods,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right), for the cc-pvtz basis set.}
|
||
|
\label{fig:n2_xe}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
%\section{\ce{Ethylene}}
|
||
|
%\label{sec:ethylene}
|
||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ethylene_pes}
|
||
|
\caption{Potential energy curves for ethylene, as function of the C$=$C distance,
|
||
|
computed with different CI methods and the cc-pvdz basis set,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right).}
|
||
|
\label{fig:ethylene_pes}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ethylene_pes_error}
|
||
|
\caption{Energy difference to the FCI results for ethylene, as function of the C$=$C distance,
|
||
|
computed with different CI methods and the cc-pvdz basis set,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right).}
|
||
|
\label{fig:ethylene_pes_error}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ethylene_pes_stat}
|
||
|
\caption{Nonparallelity error for ethylene,
|
||
|
as function of the computational scaling of excitation-based CI (red) and CIo (green) methods,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right), for the cc-pvdz basis set.}
|
||
|
\label{fig:ethylene_pes_stat}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ethylene_xe}
|
||
|
\caption{C$=$C equilibrium bond length of ethylene,
|
||
|
as function of the computational scaling of excitation-based CI (red) and CIo (green) methods,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right), for the cc-pvtz basis set.}
|
||
|
\label{fig:ethylene_xe}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
%\section{\ce{HF}}
|
||
|
%\label{sec:hf}
|
||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{hf_pes}
|
||
|
\caption{Potential energy curves for \ce{HF},
|
||
|
computed with different CI methods and the cc-pvdz basis set,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right).}
|
||
|
\label{fig:hf_pes}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{hf_pes_error}
|
||
|
\caption{Energy difference to the FCI results for \ce{HF},
|
||
|
computed with different CI methods and the cc-pvdz basis set,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right).}
|
||
|
\label{fig:hf_pes_error}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{hf_pes_stat}
|
||
|
\caption{Nonparallelity error for \ce{HF},
|
||
|
as function of the computational scaling of excitation-based CI (red) and CIo (green) methods,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right), for the cc-pvdz basis set.}
|
||
|
\label{fig:hf_pes_stat}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{hf_xe}
|
||
|
\caption{Equilibrium bond length of \ce{HF},
|
||
|
as function of the computational scaling of excitation-based CI (red) and CIo (green) methods,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right), for the cc-pvtz basis set.}
|
||
|
\label{fig:hf_xe}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
%\section{\ce{F2}}
|
||
|
%\label{sec:f2}
|
||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{f2_pes}
|
||
|
\caption{Potential energy curves for \ce{F2},
|
||
|
computed with different CI methods and the cc-pvdz basis set,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right).}
|
||
|
\label{fig:f2_pes}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{f2_pes_error}
|
||
|
\caption{Energy difference to the FCI results for \ce{F2},
|
||
|
computed with different CI methods and the cc-pvdz basis set,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right).}
|
||
|
\label{fig:f2_pes_error}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{f2_pes_stat}
|
||
|
\caption{Nonparallelity error for \ce{F2},
|
||
|
as function of the computational scaling of excitation-based CI (red) and CIo (green) methods,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right), for the cc-pvdz basis set.}
|
||
|
\label{fig:f2_pes_stat}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{f2_xe}
|
||
|
\caption{Equilibrium bond length of \ce{F2},
|
||
|
as function of the computational scaling of excitation-based CI (red) and CIo (green) methods,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right), for the cc-pvtz basis set.}
|
||
|
\label{fig:f2_xe}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
%\section{\ce{Be2}}
|
||
|
%\label{sec:be2}
|
||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{be2_pes}
|
||
|
\caption{Potential energy curves for \ce{Be2},
|
||
|
computed with different CI methods and the cc-pvtz basis set,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right).}
|
||
|
\label{fig:be2_pes}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{be2_pes_error}
|
||
|
\caption{Energy difference to the FCI results for \ce{Be2},
|
||
|
computed with different CI methods and the cc-pvtz basis set,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right).}
|
||
|
\label{fig:be2_pes_error}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{be2_pes_stat}
|
||
|
\caption{Nonparallelity error for \ce{Be2},
|
||
|
as function of the computational scaling of excitation-based CI (red) and CIo (green) methods,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right), for the cc-pvtz basis set.}
|
||
|
\label{fig:be2_pes_stat}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{be2_xe}
|
||
|
\caption{Equilibrium bond length of \ce{Be2},
|
||
|
as function of the computational scaling of excitation-based CI (red) and CIo (green) methods,
|
||
|
with Hartree-Fock orbitals (left) and orbitals optimized for a given CI method (right), for the cc-pvtz basis set.}
|
||
|
\label{fig:be2_xe}
|
||
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
||
|
%End.
|
||
|
|
||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
%\bibliography{seniority}
|
||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
|
||
|
\end{document}
|