diff --git a/Manuscript/eDFT.tex b/Manuscript/eDFT.tex
index a34ca86..6d1fb6a 100644
--- a/Manuscript/eDFT.tex
+++ b/Manuscript/eDFT.tex
@@ -1273,8 +1273,13 @@ drastically.
 %drives the all thing.\\} 
 It is important to note that, even though the GIC removes the explicit
 quadratic terms from the ensemble energy, a non-negligible curvature
-remains in the GIC-eLDA ensemble energy due to the optimization of the
-ensemble KS orbitals in the presence of ghost-interaction error {[see Eqs.~\eqref{eq:min_with_HF_ener_fun} and \eqref{eq:Ew-eLDA}]}.
+remains in the GIC-eLDA ensemble energy. \manu{This might be due to
+\textit{(i)} the correlation eLDA
+functional, which induces linear or quadratic weight dependencies of the individual
+energies [see Eqs.~\eqref{eq:Taylor_exp_ind_corr_ener_eLDA} and
+\eqref{eq:Taylor_exp_DDisc_term}], and \textit{(ii)} the optimization of the
+ensemble KS orbitals in the presence of ghost-interaction errors {[see
+Eqs.~\eqref{eq:min_with_HF_ener_fun} and \eqref{eq:WHF}]}}.
 %However, this orbital-driven error is small (in our case at
 %least) \trashEF{as the correlation part of the ensemble KS potential $\delta
 %\E{c}{\bw}[\n{}{}] /\delta \n{}{}(\br{})$ is relatively small compared