abstract and clean up discussion
This commit is contained in:
parent
21229490f1
commit
de49ada4bf
@ -132,7 +132,7 @@
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
\begin{abstract}
|
||||
We report a first generation of local, weight-dependent correlation density-functional approximations (DFAs) that incorporate information about both ground and excited states in the context of density-functional theory for ensembles (eDFT).
|
||||
These density-functional approximations for ensembles (eDFAs) are specially designed for the computation of single and double excitations within eDFT, and can be seen as a natural extension of the ubiquitous local-density approximation for ensemble (eLDA).
|
||||
These density-functional approximations for ensembles (eDFAs) are specially designed for the computation of single and double excitations within \titou{Gross--Oliveira--Kohn (GOK) DFT (\textit{i.e.}, eDFT for excited states)}, and can be seen as a natural extension of the ubiquitous local-density approximation for ensemble (eLDA).
|
||||
The resulting eDFAs, based on both finite and infinite uniform electron gas models, automatically incorporate the infamous derivative discontinuity contributions to the excitation energies through their explicit ensemble weight dependence.
|
||||
Their accuracy is illustrated by computing single and double excitations in one-dimensional many-electron systems in the weak, intermediate and strong correlation regimes.
|
||||
\titou{Although the present weight-dependent functional has been specifically designed for one-dimensional systems, the methodology proposed here is directly applicable to the construction of weight-dependent functionals for realistic three-dimensional systems, such as molecules and solids.}
|
||||
@ -1231,15 +1231,16 @@ The effect on the double excitation is less pronounced.
|
||||
Overall, one clearly sees that, with
|
||||
equal weights, KS-eLDA yields accurate excitation energies for both single and double excitations.
|
||||
This conclusion is verified for smaller and larger numbers of electrons
|
||||
(see {\SI}).\\
|
||||
\manu{Manu: now comes the question that is, I believe, central in this
|
||||
work. How important are the
|
||||
ensemble correlation derivatives $\partial \epsilon^\bw_{\rm
|
||||
c}(n)/\partial w_I$ that, unlike any functional
|
||||
in the literature, the eLDA functional contains. We have to discuss this
|
||||
point... I now see, after reading what follows that this question is
|
||||
addressed later on. We should say something here and then refer to the
|
||||
end of the section, or something like that ...}
|
||||
(see {\SI}).
|
||||
%\\
|
||||
%\manu{Manu: now comes the question that is, I believe, central in this
|
||||
%work. How important are the
|
||||
%ensemble correlation derivatives $\partial \epsilon^\bw_{\rm
|
||||
%c}(n)/\partial w_I$ that, unlike any functional
|
||||
%in the literature, the eLDA functional contains. We have to discuss this
|
||||
%point... I now see, after reading what follows that this question is
|
||||
%addressed later on. We should say something here and then refer to the
|
||||
%end of the section, or something like that ...}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
%%% FIG 4 %%%
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user