Manu: first version of the theory section. Will polish the manuscript now

This commit is contained in:
Emmanuel Fromager 2020-02-13 11:05:53 +01:00
parent d4e16e4b0e
commit cf45010298

View File

@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ n_{\bmg^\bw}({\br})=\sum_{\sigma=\alpha,\beta}\sum_{\mu\nu}\AO{\mu}({\br,\sigma}
\eeq
respectively. The exact energy level expression in Eq.~(\ref{eq:exact_ener_level_dets}) can be
rewritten as follows:
\beq
\beq\label{eq:exact_ind_ener_rdm}
E^{(I)}&&={\rm
Tr}\left[{\bmg}^{(I)}{\bm h}\right]
+\frac{1}{2} \Tr(\bmg^{(I)} \, \bG \,
@ -445,58 +445,33 @@ Note that this approximation, where the ensemble density matrix is
optimized from a non-local exchange potential [rather than a local one,
as expected from Eq.~(\ref{eq:var_ener_gokdft})] is applicable to real
(three-dimension) systems. As readily seen from
Eq.~(\ref{eq:eHF-dens_mat_func}), {\it ghost-interaction} errors will be
introduced in the ensemble HF interaction energy:
Eq.~(\ref{eq:eHF-dens_mat_func}), {\it ghost interactions}~\cite{}
and curvature~\cite{} will be
introduced in the Hx energy:
\beq
W_{\rm
HF}\left[{\bmg}^\bw\right]&=&\frac{1}{2}\sum_{K\geq 0}w^2_K
\Tr(\bmg^{(K)} \,
\bG \, \bmg^{(K)})
\nonumber\\
&&+\sum_{L>K\geq 0}w_Kw_L\Tr(\bmg^{(K)} \,
\bG \, \bmg^{(L)}).
\eeq
These errors will be removed when computing individual energies
according to Eq.~(\ref{eq:exact_ind_ener_rdm}).\\
In order to remove ghost interactions from the variational energy
expression used in the first step, we then employ the (in-principle-exact)
expression in Eq.~(\ref{eq:exact_ind_ener_OEP-like}). In this second
step, the response of the individual density matrices to weight
variations (last term on the right-hand side of
Eq.~(\ref{eq:exact_ind_ener_OEP-like})) is neglected. The complete GIC
procedure can be summarized as follows,
and
In order to compute (approximate) energy levels within generalized
GOK-DFT we use a two-step procedure. The first step consists in
optimizing variationally the ensemble density matrix according to
Eq.~(\ref{eq:var_princ_Gamma_ens}) with an approximate Hxc ensemble
functional where (i) the ghost-interaction correction functional $\overline{E}^{{\bw}}_{\rm
Hx}[n]$ in
Eq.~(\ref{eq:exact_GIC}) is
neglected, for simplicity, and (ii) the weight-dependent correlation
energy is described at the local density level of approximation.
At this
level of approximation, the two correlation functionals $\overline{E}^{{\bw}}_{\rm
c}[n]$ and ${E}^{{\bw}}_{\rm
c}[n]$ are actually identical and can be expressed as
Turning to the density-functional ensemble correlation energy, the
following eLDA will be employed:
\beq\label{eq:eLDA_corr_fun}
{E}^{{\bw}}_{\rm
c}[n]=\int d\br\;n(\br)\epsilon_{c}^{\bw}(n(\br)).
c}[n]=\int d\br\;n(\br)\;\epsilon_{c}^{\bw}(n(\br)),
\eeq
More
details about the construction of such a functional will be given in the
following.
\beq
E^{(I)}&&\approx{\rm
Tr}\left[{\bmg}^{(I)}{\bm h}\right]
+\frac{1}{2} \Tr(\bmg^{(I)} \, \bG \,
\bmg^{(I)})
\nonumber\\
&&+{E}^{{\bw}}_{\rm
c}\left[n_{\bmg^{\bw}}\right]
+\int d\br\,\dfrac{\delta {E}^{{\bw}}_{\rm
c}\left[n_{\bmg^{\bw}}\right]}{\delta
n({\br})}\left(n_{\bmg^{(I)}}(\br)-n_{\bmg^{\bw}}(\br)\right)
\nonumber\\
&&+\sum_{K>0}\left(\delta_{IK}-w_K\right)\left. \dfrac{\partial {E}^{{\bw}}_{\rm
c}\left[n\right]}{\partial w_K}\right|_{n=n_{\bmg^{\bw}}}
,
\eeq
thus leading to the final implementable expression [see Eq.~(\ref{eq:eLDA_corr_fun})]
where the correlation energy per particle is {\it weight-dependent}. Its
construction from a finite uniform electron gas model is discussed
in detail
in Sec.~\ref{sec:eDFA}. Combining Eq.~(\ref{eq:exact_ind_ener_rdm}) with
Eq.~(\ref{eq:eLDA_corr_fun}) leads to our final energy level expression
within eLDA:
\beq
E^{(I)}&&\approx{\rm
Tr}\left[{\bmg}^{(I)}{\bm h}\right]
@ -508,8 +483,10 @@ Tr}\left[{\bmg}^{(I)}{\bm h}\right]
c}(n_{\bmg^{\bw}}(\br))\,n_{\bmg^{(I)}}(\br)
\nonumber\\
&&
+\int d\br\,\left.\dfrac{\partial {\epsilon}^{{\bw}}_{\rm
c}(n)}{\partial n}\right|_{n=n_{\bmg^{\bw}}(\br)}n_{\bmg^{\bw}}(\br)\left(n_{\bmg^{(I)}}(\br)-n_{\bmg^{\bw}}(\br)\right)
+\int d\br\,
n_{\bmg^{\bw}}(\br)\left(n_{\bmg^{(I)}}(\br)-n_{\bmg^{\bw}}(\br)\right)
\left.\dfrac{\partial {\epsilon}^{{\bw}}_{\rm
c}(n)}{\partial n}\right|_{n=n_{\bmg^{\bw}}(\br)}
\nonumber\\
&&
+\int d\br\,\sum_{K>0}\left(\delta_{IK}-w_K\right)n_{\bmg^{\bw}}(\br)\left.
@ -517,6 +494,33 @@ c}(n)}{\partial n}\right|_{n=n_{\bmg^{\bw}}(\br)}n_{\bmg^{\bw}}(\br)\left(n_{\bm
c}(n)}{\partial w_K}\right|_{n=n_{\bmg^{\bw}}(\br)}.
\eeq
%%%% REMOVED FROM THE MAIN TEXT by Manu %%%%%%%%%%%%
%\iffalse%%%%
\blue{
Indeed,
\beq
\left[{\bmg}^{{\bw}}\right]^2&=&\sum_{K,L\geq
0}w_Kw_L{\bmg}^{(K)}{\bmg}^{(L)}
\nonumber\\
&=&\sum_{K\geq
0}\left(w_K\right)^2{\bmg}^{(K)}+\sum_{K\neq L\geq
0}w_Kw_L{\bmg}^{(K)}{\bmg}^{(L)}
\nonumber\\
&=&
{\bmg}^{{\bw}}+\sum_{K,L\geq
0}w_K\left(w_L-\delta_{KL}\right){\bmg}^{(K)}{\bmg}^{(L)}
\nonumber\\
&=&{\bmg}^{{\bw}}+w_0{\bmg}^{(0)}\times\sum_{K>0}w_K\left(2{\bmg}^{(K)}-1\right)
\nonumber\\
&&+\sum_{K, L >0
}w_K\left(w_L-\delta_{KL}\right){\bmg}^{(K)}{\bmg}^{(L)}
\nonumber\\
&\neq&{\bmg}^{{\bw}}
.
\eeq
}
%%%% End -- REMOVED FROM THE MAIN TEXT by Manu %%%%%%%%%%%%
%\fi%%%
\blue{$================================$}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Theory (old)}
@ -1299,31 +1303,6 @@ E.~F.~thanks the \textit{Agence Nationale de la Recherche} (MCFUNEX project, Gra
\end{acknowledgements}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%% REMOVED FROM THE MAIN TEXT by Manu %%%%%%%%%%%%
\iffalse%%%%
Indeed,
\beq
\left[{\bmg}^{{\bw}}\right]^2&=&\sum_{K,L\geq
0}w_Kw_L{\bmg}^{(K)}{\bmg}^{(L)}
\nonumber\\
&=&\sum_{K\geq
0}\left(w_K\right)^2{\bmg}^{(K)}+\sum_{K\neq L\geq
0}w_Kw_L{\bmg}^{(K)}{\bmg}^{(L)}
\nonumber\\
&=&
{\bmg}^{{\bw}}+\sum_{K,L\geq
0}w_K\left(w_L-\delta_{KL}\right){\bmg}^{(K)}{\bmg}^{(L)}
\nonumber\\
&=&{\bmg}^{{\bw}}+w_0{\bmg}^{(0)}\times\sum_{K>0}w_K\left(2{\bmg}^{(K)}-1\right)
\nonumber\\
&&+\sum_{K, L >0
}w_K\left(w_L-\delta_{KL}\right){\bmg}^{(K)}{\bmg}^{(L)}
\nonumber\\
&\neq&{\bmg}^{{\bw}}
.
\eeq
%%%% End -- REMOVED FROM THE MAIN TEXT by Manu %%%%%%%%%%%%
\fi%%%