Manu: repolished the introduction
This commit is contained in:
parent
67fe841237
commit
c75585752c
@ -160,15 +160,16 @@ Despite its success, the standard Kohn-Sham (KS) formulation of DFT \cite{Kohn_1
|
||||
The description of strongly multiconfigurational ground states (often
|
||||
referred to as ``strong correlation problem'') still remains a
|
||||
challenge. \cite{Gori-Giorgi_2010,Fromager_2015,Gagliardi_2017}
|
||||
Another issue, which is partly connected to the previous one, is the description of electronically-excited states.
|
||||
Another issue, which is partly connected to the previous one, is the
|
||||
description of low-lying quasi-degenerate states.
|
||||
|
||||
The standard approach for modeling excited states in DFT is
|
||||
The standard approach for modeling excited states in a DFT framework is
|
||||
linear-response time-dependent DFT (TDDFT). \cite{Runge_1984,Casida,Casida_2012}
|
||||
In this case, the electronic spectrum relies on the (unperturbed) ground-state KS picture, which may break down when electron correlation is strong.
|
||||
Moreover, in exact TDDFT, the xc energy is in fact an xc action \cite{Vignale_2008} which is a
|
||||
In this case, the electronic spectrum relies on the (unperturbed) pure-ground-state KS picture, which may break down when electron correlation is strong.
|
||||
Moreover, in exact TDDFT, the xc energy is in fact an xc {\it action} \cite{Vignale_2008} which is a
|
||||
functional of the time-dependent density $n\equiv n(\br,t)$ and, as
|
||||
such, has memory. Standard implementations of TDDFT rely on
|
||||
the adiabatic approximation where memory effects are neglected. In other
|
||||
such, it should incorporate memory effects. Standard implementations of TDDFT rely on
|
||||
the adiabatic approximation where these effects are neglected. In other
|
||||
words, the xc functional is assumed to be local in time. \cite{Casida,Casida_2012}
|
||||
As a result, double electronic excitations are completely absent from the TDDFT spectrum, thus reducing further the applicability of TDDFT. \cite{Maitra_2004,Cave_2004,Mazur_2009,Romaniello_2009a,Sangalli_2011,Mazur_2011,Huix-Rotllant_2011,Elliott_2011,Maitra_2012,Sundstrom_2014,Loos_2019}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -180,11 +181,11 @@ and excited states altogether, \ie, with the same set of orbitals.
|
||||
Interestingly, a similar approach exists in DFT. Referred to as
|
||||
Gross--Oliveira--Kohn (GOK) DFT\cite{Gross_1988a,Gross_1988b,Oliveira_1988}, it was proposed at the end of the 80's as a generalization
|
||||
of Theophilou's DFT for equiensembles. \cite{Theophilou_1979}
|
||||
In exact GOK-DFT, the ensemble xc energy not only a functional of the
|
||||
In GOK-DFT, the ensemble xc energy is a functional of the
|
||||
density but also a
|
||||
function of the ensemble weights. Note that, unlike in conventional
|
||||
Boltzmann ensembles~\cite{Pastorczak_2013}, the weights (each state in the ensemble
|
||||
is assigned a given and fixed weight) are allowed to vary
|
||||
Boltzmann ensembles~\cite{Pastorczak_2013}, the ensemble weights [each state in the ensemble
|
||||
is assigned a given and fixed weight] are allowed to vary
|
||||
independently in a GOK ensemble.
|
||||
The weight dependence of the xc functional plays a crucial role in the
|
||||
calculation of excitation energies.
|
||||
@ -193,12 +194,12 @@ It actually accounts for the derivative discontinuity contribution to energy gap
|
||||
%\titou{Shall we further discuss the derivative discontinuity? Why is it important and where is it coming from?}
|
||||
|
||||
Even though GOK-DFT is in principle able to
|
||||
tackle near-degenerate situations and multiple-electron excitation
|
||||
describe near-degenerate situations and multiple-electron excitation
|
||||
processes, it has not
|
||||
been given much attention until quite recently. \cite{Franck_2014,Borgoo_2015,Kazaryan_2008,Gould_2013,Gould_2014,Filatov_2015,Filatov_2015b,Filatov_2015c,Gould_2017,Deur_2017,Gould_2018,Gould_2019,Sagredo_2018,Ayers_2018,Deur_2018,Deur_2019,Kraisler_2013, Kraisler_2014,Alam_2016,Alam_2017,Nagy_1998,Nagy_2001,Nagy_2005,Pastorczak_2013,Pastorczak_2014,Pribram-Jones_2014,Yang_2013a,Yang_2014,Yang_2017,Senjean_2015,Senjean_2016,Senjean_2018,Smith_2016}
|
||||
One of the reason is the lack, not to say the absence, of reliable
|
||||
density-functional approximations for ensembles (eDFAs) in the literature.
|
||||
The most recent works on this topic are still fundamental and
|
||||
density-functional approximations for ensembles (eDFAs).
|
||||
The most recent works dealing with this particular issue are still fundamental and
|
||||
exploratory, as they rely either on simple (but nontrivial) model
|
||||
systems
|
||||
\cite{Carrascal_2015,Deur_2017,Deur_2018,Deur_2019,Senjean_2015,Senjean_2016,Senjean_2018,Sagredo_2018,Senjean_2020,Fromager_2020,Gould_2019}
|
||||
@ -210,7 +211,7 @@ discontinuity problem that ocurs when crossing an integral number of
|
||||
electrons can be recast into a weight-dependent ensemble
|
||||
one. \cite{Senjean_2018,Senjean_2020}
|
||||
|
||||
The present work is an attempt to answer this question,
|
||||
The present work is an attempt to address this problem,
|
||||
with the ambition to turn, in the forthcoming future, GOK-DFT into a
|
||||
(low-cost) practical computational method for modeling excited states in molecules and extended systems.
|
||||
Starting from the ubiquitous local-density approximation (LDA), we
|
||||
@ -220,8 +221,8 @@ extracted. The present eDFA, \trashEF{is specially designed for the computation
|
||||
single and double excitations within GOK-DFT}, which can be seen as a natural
|
||||
extension of LDA, will be referred to as eLDA in the remaining of this paper.
|
||||
As a proof of concept, we apply this general strategy to
|
||||
ensemble correlation energies only [we use the orbital-dependent exact
|
||||
ensemble exchange energy for convenience] in the particular case of
|
||||
ensemble correlation energies [that we combine with
|
||||
ensemble exact exchange energies] in the particular case of
|
||||
\emph{strict} one-dimensional (1D) and
|
||||
spin-polarized systems. \cite{Loos_2012, Loos_2013a, Loos_2014a, Loos_2014b}
|
||||
In other words, the Coulomb interaction used in this work describes
|
||||
@ -234,9 +235,8 @@ In these extreme conditions, where magnetic effects compete with Coulombic force
|
||||
|
||||
The paper is organized as follows.
|
||||
Exact and approximate formulations of GOK-DFT are discussed in Section
|
||||
\ref{sec:eDFT}, with a particular emphasis on the extraction of
|
||||
individual energy levels and the calculation of individual exact exchange
|
||||
energies.
|
||||
\ref{sec:eDFT}, with a particular emphasis on the calculation of
|
||||
individual energy levels.
|
||||
In Sec.~\ref{sec:eDFA}, we detail the construction of the
|
||||
weight-dependent local correlation functional specially designed for the
|
||||
computation of single and double excitations within GOK-DFT.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user