Manu: started my revision. Saving work
This commit is contained in:
parent
dc671d9ce1
commit
bf39ce4273
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{letter}%
|
||||
{To the Editors of the Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters}
|
||||
{To the Editors of the Journal of Chemical Physics}
|
||||
|
||||
\opening{Dear Editors,}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -47,7 +47,14 @@ We look forward to hearing from you.
|
||||
{Page 4: barred correlation per particle is introduced implicitly in Eqn 41.
|
||||
Some pieces of the later discussion of this quantity might be helpful here, since this quantity appears in discussion of eqns 48 and 49, }
|
||||
\\
|
||||
\alert{This part is for you Manu.}
|
||||
\alert{For clarity, we now mention that the expression in Eq. (41)
|
||||
has a general structure, which should be exact for any uniform system. We
|
||||
point out that, unlike in the exact theory, the correlation components
|
||||
of eLDA are weight-independent. We
|
||||
also mention explicitly that these components will be constructed (in
|
||||
the following) from
|
||||
the correlation excitation energies of a finite uniform electron gas. We
|
||||
refer to Sec. III for further details.}
|
||||
|
||||
\item
|
||||
{Page 4: It would be helpful to note clearly near eqn 40 that the authors' focus on LDA correlation differs from what many readers will be used to in ground-state LDA, namely using LDA exchange as well, instead of combining it with HF Hartree-exchange as is done here.
|
||||
@ -55,7 +62,7 @@ We look forward to hearing from you.
|
||||
}
|
||||
\\
|
||||
\alert{The reviewer is right.
|
||||
We have added a note to clarify this point just below Eq.~(40).}
|
||||
We have added a note to clarify this point just after Eq.~(41).}
|
||||
|
||||
\item
|
||||
{Page 5: The authors' expansion of the correlation energy around the $I$th state and its resulting neglect of correlation effects between states more remote from one another might affect evaluation and analysis of the approximation and/or the embedding scheme.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user