new fig 5

Manuscript/eDFT.tex

@@ -1305,11 +1305,11 @@ electrons.
 
 %%% FIG 5 %%%
 \begin{figure}
-	\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EvsL_5_HF}
+	\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EvsL_3_DD}
 	\caption{
 	\label{fig:EvsLHF}
-	Error with respect to FCI (in \%) associated with the single excitation $\Ex{}{(1)}$ (bottom) and double excitation $\Ex{}{(2)}$ (top) as a function of the box length $L$ for 3-boxium at the KS-eLDA (solid lines) and eHF (dashed lines) levels. 
+	Error with respect to FCI (in \%) associated with the single excitation $\Ex{}{(1)}$ (bottom) and double excitation $\Ex{}{(2)}$ (top) as a function of the box length $L$ for 3-boxium at the KS-eLDA level.
-	Zero-weight (\ie, $\ew{1} = \ew{2} = 0$, red lines) and equi-weight (\ie, $\ew{1} = \ew{2} = 1/3$, blue lines) calculations are reported. 
+	Zero-weight (\ie, $\ew{1} = \ew{2} = 0$, red lines) and equiweight (\ie, $\ew{1} = \ew{2} = 1/3$, blue lines) calculations are reported. 
 	}
 \end{figure}
 %%% %%% %%%
@@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ of modeling properly the ensemble correlation derivative.
 	\label{fig:EvsN_HF}
 	Error with respect to FCI in single and double excitation energies for $\nEl$-boxium (with a box length of $L=8\pi$) as a function of the number of electrons $\nEl$ at the KS-eLDA (solid lines) and eHF (dashed lines) levels. 
 	Zero-weight (\ie, $\ew{1} = \ew{2} = 0$, black and red lines) and
-equi-weight (\ie, $\ew{1} = \ew{2} = 1/3$, blue and green lines) calculations are reported. 
+equiweight (\ie, $\ew{1} = \ew{2} = 1/3$, blue and green lines) calculations are reported. 
 	}
 \end{figure}
 %%% %%% %%%