done up to discussion
This commit is contained in:
parent
00af305ab4
commit
a3ab449225
@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ Note that, within the approximation of Eq.~\eqref{eq:min_with_HF_ener_fun}, the
|
|||||||
optimized with a non-local exchange potential rather than a
|
optimized with a non-local exchange potential rather than a
|
||||||
density-functional local one, as expected from
|
density-functional local one, as expected from
|
||||||
Eq.~\eqref{eq:var_ener_gokdft}. This procedure is actually general, \ie,
|
Eq.~\eqref{eq:var_ener_gokdft}. This procedure is actually general, \ie,
|
||||||
applicable to not-necessarily spin polarized and real (higher-dimensional) systems.
|
applicable to not-necessarily spin-polarized and real (higher-dimensional) systems.
|
||||||
As readily seen from Eq.~\eqref{eq:eHF-dens_mat_func}, inserting the
|
As readily seen from Eq.~\eqref{eq:eHF-dens_mat_func}, inserting the
|
||||||
ensemble density matrix into the HF interaction energy functional
|
ensemble density matrix into the HF interaction energy functional
|
||||||
introduces unphysical \textit{ghost-interaction} errors \cite{Gidopoulos_2002, Pastorczak_2014, Alam_2016, Alam_2017, Gould_2017}
|
introduces unphysical \textit{ghost-interaction} errors \cite{Gidopoulos_2002, Pastorczak_2014, Alam_2016, Alam_2017, Gould_2017}
|
||||||
@ -834,9 +834,8 @@ as well as \textit{curvature}:\cite{Alam_2016,Alam_2017}
|
|||||||
\eeq
|
\eeq
|
||||||
The ensemble energy is of course expected to vary linearly with the ensemble
|
The ensemble energy is of course expected to vary linearly with the ensemble
|
||||||
weights [see Eq.~\eqref{eq:exact_GOK_ens_ener}].
|
weights [see Eq.~\eqref{eq:exact_GOK_ens_ener}].
|
||||||
\manu{
|
|
||||||
The explicit linear weight dependence of the ensemble Hx energy is actually restored when evaluating the individual energy
|
The explicit linear weight dependence of the ensemble Hx energy is actually restored when evaluating the individual energy
|
||||||
levels on the basis of Eq.~\eqref{eq:exact_ind_ener_rdm}.}
|
levels on the basis of Eq.~\eqref{eq:exact_ind_ener_rdm}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Turning to the density-functional ensemble correlation energy, the
|
Turning to the density-functional ensemble correlation energy, the
|
||||||
following ensemble local-density approximation (eLDA) will be employed
|
following ensemble local-density approximation (eLDA) will be employed
|
||||||
@ -1031,9 +1030,9 @@ gaps, can be seen as more relevant in this context. \cite{Loos_2014a, Loos_2014b
|
|||||||
However, an obvious drawback of using finite uniform electron gases is
|
However, an obvious drawback of using finite uniform electron gases is
|
||||||
that the resulting density-functional approximation for ensembles
|
that the resulting density-functional approximation for ensembles
|
||||||
will inexorably depend on the number of electrons in the finite uniform electron gas (see below).
|
will inexorably depend on the number of electrons in the finite uniform electron gas (see below).
|
||||||
Here, we propose to construct a weight-dependent eLDA for the
|
Here, we propose to construct a weight-dependent LDA functional for the
|
||||||
calculation of excited states in 1D systems by combining finite uniform electron gases with the
|
calculation of excited states in 1D systems by combining finite uniform electron gases with the
|
||||||
usual infinite uniform electron gas.
|
usual infinite uniform electron gas paradigm.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As a finite uniform electron gas, we consider the ringium model in which electrons move on a perfect ring (\ie, a circle) but interact \textit{through} the ring. \cite{Loos_2012, Loos_2013a, Loos_2014b}
|
As a finite uniform electron gas, we consider the ringium model in which electrons move on a perfect ring (\ie, a circle) but interact \textit{through} the ring. \cite{Loos_2012, Loos_2013a, Loos_2014b}
|
||||||
The most appealing feature of ringium regarding the development of
|
The most appealing feature of ringium regarding the development of
|
||||||
@ -1209,9 +1208,9 @@ We use as basis functions the (orthonormal) orbitals of the one-electron system,
|
|||||||
\end{equation}
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
with $ \mu = 1,\ldots,\nBas$ and $\nBas = 30$ for all calculations.
|
with $ \mu = 1,\ldots,\nBas$ and $\nBas = 30$ for all calculations.
|
||||||
The convergence threshold $\tau = \max{ \abs{ \bF{\bw} \bGam{\bw}
|
The convergence threshold $\tau = \max{ \abs{ \bF{\bw} \bGam{\bw}
|
||||||
\bS - \bS \bGam{\bw} \bF{\bw}}}$ [see Eq.~\eqref{eq:commut_F_AO}] is set
|
\bS - \bS \bGam{\bw} \bF{\bw}}}$ [see Eq.~\eqref{eq:commut_F_AO}] of the KS-DFT self-consistent calculation is set
|
||||||
to $10^{-5}$. For comparison, regular HF and KS-DFT calculations
|
to $10^{-5}$.
|
||||||
are performed with the same threshold.
|
%For comparison, regular HF and KS-DFT calculations are performed with the same threshold.
|
||||||
In order to compute the various density-functional
|
In order to compute the various density-functional
|
||||||
integrals that cannot be performed in closed form,
|
integrals that cannot be performed in closed form,
|
||||||
a 51-point Gauss-Legendre quadrature is employed.
|
a 51-point Gauss-Legendre quadrature is employed.
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user