diff --git a/Manuscript/eDFT.tex b/Manuscript/eDFT.tex
index 3bc5a1e..b6051ce 100644
--- a/Manuscript/eDFT.tex
+++ b/Manuscript/eDFT.tex
@@ -121,9 +121,7 @@
 
 \begin{document}	
 
-\title{Weight-dependent local density-functional \manu{approximation to
-ensemble correlation energies}}
-%\title{Weight-dependent local density-functional approximations for ensembles}
+\title{A weight-dependent local correlation density-functional approximation for ensembles}
 
 \author{Pierre-Fran\c{c}ois Loos}
 \email{loos@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr}
@@ -1272,16 +1270,16 @@ drastically.
 %when looking at your curves, this assumption cannot be made when the
 %correlation is strong. It is not clear to me which integral ($W_{01}?$)
 %drives the all thing.\\} 
-It is important to note that, even though the GIC removes the explicit
-quadratic \manu{Hx} terms from the ensemble energy, a non-negligible curvature
-remains in the GIC-eLDA ensemble energy \manu{when the electron
-correlation is strong}. \manu{This is due to
+It is important to note that, even though the GIC removes the explicitly
+quadratic Hx terms from the ensemble energy, a non-negligible curvature
+remains in the GIC-eLDA ensemble energy when the electron
+correlation is strong. This is due to
 \textit{(i)} the correlation eLDA
 functional, which contributes linearly (or even quadratically) to the individual
 energies [see Eqs.~\eqref{eq:Taylor_exp_ind_corr_ener_eLDA} and
 \eqref{eq:Taylor_exp_DDisc_term}], and \textit{(ii)} the optimization of the
 ensemble KS orbitals in the presence of ghost-interaction errors {[see
-Eqs.~\eqref{eq:min_with_HF_ener_fun} and \eqref{eq:WHF}]}}.
+Eqs.~\eqref{eq:min_with_HF_ener_fun} and \eqref{eq:WHF}]}.
 %However, this orbital-driven error is small (in our case at
 %least) \trashEF{as the correlation part of the ensemble KS potential $\delta
 %\E{c}{\bw}[\n{}{}] /\delta \n{}{}(\br{})$ is relatively small compared