Manu: saving work in the introduction
This commit is contained in:
parent
36144ca606
commit
33060b9163
@ -189,29 +189,59 @@ independently in a GOK ensemble.
|
||||
The weight dependence of the xc functional plays a crucial role in the
|
||||
calculation of excitation energies.
|
||||
\cite{Gross_1988b,Yang_2014,Deur_2017,Deur_2019,Senjean_2018,Senjean_2020}
|
||||
It actually accounts for the infamous derivative discontinuity contribution to energy gaps. \cite{Levy_1995, Perdew_1983}
|
||||
It actually accounts for the derivative discontinuity contribution to energy gaps. \cite{Levy_1995, Perdew_1983}
|
||||
%\titou{Shall we further discuss the derivative discontinuity? Why is it important and where is it coming from?}
|
||||
|
||||
Despite its formal beauty and the fact that GOK-DFT can in principle tackle near-degenerate situations and multiple excitations, it has not been given much attention until recently. \cite{Franck_2014,Borgoo_2015,Kazaryan_2008,Gould_2013,Gould_2014,Filatov_2015,Filatov_2015b,Filatov_2015c,Gould_2017,Deur_2017,Gould_2018,Gould_2019,Sagredo_2018,Ayers_2018,Deur_2018,Deur_2019,Kraisler_2013, Kraisler_2014,Alam_2016,Alam_2017,Nagy_1998,Nagy_2001,Nagy_2005,Pastorczak_2013,Pastorczak_2014,Pribram-Jones_2014,Yang_2013a,Yang_2014,Yang_2017,Senjean_2015,Senjean_2016,Senjean_2018,Smith_2016}
|
||||
The main reason is simply the absence of density-functional approximations (DFAs) for ensembles in the literature.
|
||||
Recent works on this topic are still fundamental and exploratory, as they rely either on simple (but nontrivial) models like the Hubbard dimer \cite{Carrascal_2015,Deur_2017,Deur_2018,Deur_2019,Senjean_2015,Senjean_2016,Senjean_2018,Sagredo_2018} or on atoms for which highly accurate or exact-exchange-only calculations have been performed. \cite{Yang_2014,Yang_2017}
|
||||
In both cases, the key problem, namely the design of weight-dependent DFAs for ensembles (eDFAs), remains open.
|
||||
A first step towards this goal is presented in the present manuscript with the ambition to turn, in the forthcoming future, GOK-DFT into a practical computational method for modeling excited states in molecules and extended systems.
|
||||
The present eDFA is specially designed for the computation of single and double excitations within GOK-DFT, and can be seen as a natural extension of the ubiquitous local-density approximation (LDA) for ensemble.
|
||||
Consequently, we will refer to this eDFA as eLDA in the remaining of this paper.
|
||||
Even though GOK-DFT is in principle able to
|
||||
tackle near-degenerate situations and multiple-electron excitation
|
||||
processes, it has not
|
||||
been given much attention until quite recently. \cite{Franck_2014,Borgoo_2015,Kazaryan_2008,Gould_2013,Gould_2014,Filatov_2015,Filatov_2015b,Filatov_2015c,Gould_2017,Deur_2017,Gould_2018,Gould_2019,Sagredo_2018,Ayers_2018,Deur_2018,Deur_2019,Kraisler_2013, Kraisler_2014,Alam_2016,Alam_2017,Nagy_1998,Nagy_2001,Nagy_2005,Pastorczak_2013,Pastorczak_2014,Pribram-Jones_2014,Yang_2013a,Yang_2014,Yang_2017,Senjean_2015,Senjean_2016,Senjean_2018,Smith_2016}
|
||||
One of the reason is the lack, not to say the absence, of reliable
|
||||
density-functional approximations for ensembles (eDFAs) in the literature.
|
||||
The most recent works on this topic are still fundamental and
|
||||
exploratory, as they rely either on simple (but nontrivial) model
|
||||
systems
|
||||
\cite{Carrascal_2015,Deur_2017,Deur_2018,Deur_2019,Senjean_2015,Senjean_2016,Senjean_2018,Sagredo_2018,Senjean_2020,Fromager_2020,Gould_2019}
|
||||
or atoms. \cite{Yang_2014,Yang_2017,Gould_2019_insights}
|
||||
Despite all these efforts, it is still unclear how weight dependencies
|
||||
can be incorporated into eDFAs. This problem is actually central not
|
||||
only in GOK-DFT but also in conventional (ground-state) DFT as the infamous derivative
|
||||
discontinuity problem that ocurs when crossing an integral number of
|
||||
electrons can be recast into a weight-dependent ensemble
|
||||
one. \cite{Senjean_2018,Senjean_2020}
|
||||
|
||||
In the following, the present methodology is illustrated on \emph{strict} one-dimensional (1D), spin-polarized electronic systems. \cite{Loos_2012, Loos_2013a, Loos_2014a, Loos_2014b}
|
||||
In other words, the Coulomb interaction used in this work describes particles which are \emph{strictly} restricted to move within a 1D sub-space of three-dimensional space.
|
||||
The present work is an attempt to answer this question,
|
||||
with the ambition to turn, in the forthcoming future, GOK-DFT into a
|
||||
(low-cost) practical computational method for modeling excited states in molecules and extended systems.
|
||||
Starting from the ubiquitous local-density approximation (LDA), we
|
||||
design a weight-dependent ensemble correction based on a finite uniform
|
||||
electron gas from which density-functional excitation energies can be
|
||||
extracted. The present eDFA, \trashEF{is specially designed for the computation of
|
||||
single and double excitations within GOK-DFT}, which can be seen as a natural
|
||||
extension of LDA, will be referred to as eLDA in the remaining of this paper.
|
||||
As a proof of concept, we apply this general strategy to
|
||||
ensemble correlation energies only [we use the orbital-dependent exact
|
||||
ensemble exchange energy for convenience] in the particular case of
|
||||
\emph{strict} one-dimensional (1D) and
|
||||
spin-polarized systems. \cite{Loos_2012, Loos_2013a, Loos_2014a, Loos_2014b}
|
||||
In other words, the Coulomb interaction used in this work describes
|
||||
particles\manu{Manu: the sentence sounds weird to me. An interaction does not
|
||||
describe particles ...} which are \emph{strictly} restricted to move within a 1D sub-space of three-dimensional space.
|
||||
Despite their simplicity, 1D models are scrutinized as paradigms for quasi-1D materials \cite{Schulz_1993, Fogler_2005a} such as carbon nanotubes \cite{Bockrath_1999, Ishii_2003, Deshpande_2008} or nanowires. \cite{Meyer_2009, Deshpande_2010}
|
||||
%Early models of 1D atoms using this interaction have been used to study the effects of external fields upon Rydberg atoms \cite{Burnett_1993, Mayle_2007} and the dynamics of surface-state electrons in liquid helium. \cite{Nieto_2000, Patil_2001}
|
||||
This description of 1D systems also has interesting connections with the exotic chemistry of ultra-high magnetic fields (such as those in white dwarf stars), where the electronic cloud is dramatically compressed perpendicular to the magnetic field. \cite{Schmelcher_1990, Lange_2012, Schmelcher_2012}
|
||||
In these extreme conditions, where magnetic effects compete with Coulombic forces, entirely new bonding paradigms emerge. \cite{Schmelcher_1990, Schmelcher_1997, Tellgren_2008, Tellgren_2009, Lange_2012, Schmelcher_2012, Boblest_2014, Stopkowicz_2015}
|
||||
|
||||
The paper is organized as follows.
|
||||
Section \ref{sec:eDFT} introduces the equations behind GOK-DFT.
|
||||
In Sec.~\ref{sec:eDFA}, we detail the construction of the weight-dependent local correlation functional specially designed for the computation of single and double excitations within eDFT.
|
||||
Exact and approximate formulations of GOK-DFT are discussed in Section
|
||||
\ref{sec:eDFT}, with a particular emphasis on the extraction of
|
||||
individual energy levels and the calculation of individual exact exchange
|
||||
energies.
|
||||
In Sec.~\ref{sec:eDFA}, we detail the construction of the
|
||||
weight-dependent local correlation functional specially designed for the
|
||||
computation of single and double excitations within GOK-DFT.
|
||||
Computational details needed to reproduce the results of the present work are reported in Sec.~\ref{sec:comp_details}.
|
||||
In Sec.~\ref{sec:res}, we illustrate the accuracy of the present eDFA by computing single and double excitations in one-dimensional many-electron systems in the weak, intermediate and strong correlation regimes.
|
||||
In Sec.~\ref{sec:res}, we illustrate the accuracy of the present eLDA by computing single and double excitations in one-dimensional many-electron systems in the weak, intermediate and strong correlation regimes.
|
||||
Finally, we draw our conclusion in Sec.~\ref{sec:conclusion}.
|
||||
Atomic units are used throughout.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user