fig2

Manuscript/eDFT.tex

@@ -1176,8 +1176,13 @@ ensemble KS orbitals in the presence of GIE [see Eq.~\eqref{eq:min_with_HF_ener_
 \end{figure*}
 %%% %%% %%%
 
+Figure \ref{fig:EIvsW} reports the behavior of the three KS-eLDA individual energies as functions of the weights.
+\titou{Here comes the discussion.
+The individual energies do not vary in the same way depending on the state considered and the weight chosen. 
+We see for example that the energy of the ground state increases when we increase the weight of the bi-ensemble, thus showing that we ``deteriorate'' this state a little by optimizing the orbitals also for the excited states. 
+Interesting also to see that the reverse occurs in the tri-ensemble.} 
 
-%%% FIG 2 %%%
+%%% FIG 3 %%%
 \begin{figure}
 	\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EvsL_5}
 	\caption{
@@ -1237,7 +1242,7 @@ addressed later on. We should say something here and then refer to the
 end of the section, or something like that ...}
 
 
-%%% FIG 3 %%%
+%%% FIG 4 %%%
 \begin{figure*}
 	\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EvsN}
 	\caption{
@@ -1275,7 +1280,7 @@ two-electron model system, the present methodology is applicable to any
 1D electronic system, \ie, a system that has more than two
 electrons. 
 
-%%% FIG 4 %%%
+%%% FIG 5 %%%
 \begin{figure}
 	\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EvsL_5_HF}
 	\caption{
@@ -1318,7 +1323,7 @@ only speculate. Let us first see how important the contribution in
 Eq.~\eqref{eq:DD_term_to_compute} is. What follows should also be
 updated in the light of the new results.}
 
-%%% FIG 5 %%%
+%%% FIG 6 %%%
 \begin{figure}
 	\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EvsN_HF}
 	\caption{