diff --git a/Revised_Manuscript/eDFT.tex b/Revised_Manuscript/eDFT.tex
index 6e92049..3f8dd52 100644
--- a/Revised_Manuscript/eDFT.tex
+++ b/Revised_Manuscript/eDFT.tex
@@ -1052,7 +1052,15 @@ case, we
 ``deteriorate'' these states by optimizing the orbitals for the
 ensemble, rather than for each state separately. The reverse actually occurs for the ground state in the triensemble
 as $\ew{2}$ increases. The variations in the ensemble
-weights are essentially linear or quadratic. They are induced by the
+weights are essentially linear or quadratic. 
+\manurev{This can be rationalized as follows. As readily seen from
+Eqs.~(\ref{eq:EI-eLDA}) and (\ref{eq:ind_HF-like_ener}), the individual
+HF-like exchange does not depend explicitly on the weights, which means
+that the above-mentioned variations originate from the eLDA correlation
+functional [second and third terms on the right-hand side of
+Eq.~(\ref{eq:EI-eLDA})]. If, for analysis purposes, we consider the
+Taylor expansions around the uniform density regime in Eqs.~(\ref{eq:Taylor_exp_ind_corr_ener_eLDA}) and (\ref{eq:Taylor_exp_DDisc_term})
+}They are induced by the
 eLDA correlation functional, as readily seen from
 Eqs.~\eqref{eq:Taylor_exp_ind_corr_ener_eLDA} and
 \eqref{eq:Taylor_exp_DDisc_term}. In the biensemble, the weight dependence of the first