314 lines
10 KiB
TeX
314 lines
10 KiB
TeX
|
\documentclass[aip,jcp,reprint,noshowkeys,superscriptaddress]{revtex4-1}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
\usepackage{graphicx,dcolumn,bm,xcolor,hyperref,multirow,amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts,physics}
|
||
|
|
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
|
||
|
|
\usepackage[version=4]{mhchem}
|
||
|
|
\usepackage[compat=1.1.0]{tikz-feynman}
|
||
|
|
\usepackage[tracking]{microtype}
|
||
|
|
\usepackage{mathpazo,libertine}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
\usepackage{algorithmicx,algorithm,algpseudocode}
|
||
|
|
\algnewcommand\algorithmicassert{\texttt{assert}}
|
||
|
|
\algnewcommand\Assert[1]{\State \algorithmicassert(#1)}
|
||
|
|
\algrenewcommand{\algorithmiccomment}[1]{$\triangleright$ #1}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\alert}[1]{\textcolor{red}{#1}}
|
||
|
|
\definecolor{darkgreen}{RGB}{0, 180, 0}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
%\usepackage{hyperref}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\cdash}{\multicolumn{1}{c}{---}}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\eps}{\epsilon}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\mc}{\multicolumn}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\mr}{\multirow}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\fnm}{\footnotemark}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\fnt}{\footnotetext}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\mcc}[1]{\multicolumn{1}{c}{#1}}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
% functionals, potentials, densities, etc
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\e}[2]{\eps_\text{#1}^{#2}}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\n}[1]{n^{#1}}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\DD}[2]{\Delta_\text{#1}^{#2}}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\LZ}[2]{\Xi_\text{#1}^{#2}}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
% energies
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\EHF}{E_\text{HF}}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\Ec}{E_\text{c}}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\Ecat}{E_\text{cat}}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\Eneu}{E_\text{neu}}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\Eani}{E_\text{ani}}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\EPT}{E_\text{PT2}}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\EFCI}{E_\text{FCI}}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\br}{\mathbf{r}}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\bw}{\mathbf{w}}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\bP}[1]{\mathbf{P}^{#1}}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\bG}{\mathbf{G}}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\bH}{\mathbf{H}}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\bF}[1]{\mathbf{F}^{#1}}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
% units
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\IneV}[1]{#1 eV}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\InAU}[1]{#1 a.u.}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\InAA}[1]{#1 \AA}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\LCPQ}{Laboratoire de Chimie et Physique Quantiques (UMR 5626), Universit\'e de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, France}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\LCQ}{Laboratoire de Chimie Quantique, Institut de Chimie, CNRS, Universit\'e de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
%%% Manu %%%
|
||
|
|
\definecolor{dgreen}{rgb}{0,.5,0}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\manu}[1]{{\textcolor{dgreen}{ Manu: #1 }} }
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\be}{\begin{eqnarray}}
|
||
|
|
\newcommand{\ee}{\end{eqnarray}}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
\begin{document}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
\title{Notes on density-functional theory for ensembles}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
\author{Pierre-Fran\c{c}ois Loos}
|
||
|
|
\email{loos@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr}
|
||
|
|
\affiliation{\LCPQ}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
\begin{abstract}
|
||
|
|
\end{abstract}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
\maketitle
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
|
\section{Optical gap}
|
||
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
|
\subsection{The weight-dependent functional}
|
||
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
|
The present weight-dependent density-functional approximation for ensemble (eDFA) is specifically designed for the calculation of excitation energies within eDFT.
|
||
|
|
In order to take into bot single and double excitations simultaneously, the present eDFA is based on the ground state ($I=0$), first singly-excited state ($I=1$) and first doubly-excited states ($I=2$) of the two-electron ringium system.
|
||
|
|
This functional can be seen as a local-density approximation (LDA) type functional for ensembles.
|
||
|
|
All these states have the same (uniform) density $n = 2/(2\pi R)$ where $R$ is the radius of the ring where the electrons are confined.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
One can easily write down the reduced (i.e.~per electron) Hartree+exchange (Hx) energy of these three states:
|
||
|
|
\begin{align}
|
||
|
|
\e{Hx}{(0)}(n) & = n,
|
||
|
|
&
|
||
|
|
\e{Hx}{(1)}(n) & = 4 n/3,
|
||
|
|
&
|
||
|
|
\e{Hx}{(2)}(n) & = 23 n/15.
|
||
|
|
\end{align}
|
||
|
|
Similarly, we can provide an accurate analytical expression of the correlation (c) energy via the following Pad\'e approximant
|
||
|
|
\begin{equation}
|
||
|
|
\e{c}{(I)}(n) = \frac{a^{(I)}\,n}{n + b^{(I)} \sqrt{n} + c^{(I)}}
|
||
|
|
\end{equation}
|
||
|
|
where $b^{(I)}$ and $c^{(I)}$ are state-dependent fitting parameters, which are provided in Table \ref{tab:OG_func}.
|
||
|
|
$a^{(I)}$ is obtained via the high--density expansions of the correlation energy.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
%%% TABLE 1 %%%
|
||
|
|
\begin{table*}
|
||
|
|
\caption{\label{tab:OG_func}
|
||
|
|
Parameters of the correlation functional for the optical gap.}
|
||
|
|
\begin{ruledtabular}
|
||
|
|
\begin{tabular}{lcddd}
|
||
|
|
State & $I$ & \mcc{$a^{(I)}$} & \mcc{$b^{(I)}$} & \mcc{$c^{(I)}$} \\
|
||
|
|
\hline
|
||
|
|
Ground state & $0$ & -0.0137078 & 0.0748000 & 0.0566294 \\
|
||
|
|
First singly-excited state & $1$ & -0.0240765 & 0.0553987 & 0.0163852 \\
|
||
|
|
First doubly-excited state & $2$ & -0.00935749 & 0.0334572 & -0.0249377 \\
|
||
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
||
|
|
\end{ruledtabular}
|
||
|
|
\end{table*}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Based on these quantities, one can build three-state weight-dependent functionals:
|
||
|
|
\begin{subequations}
|
||
|
|
\begin{align}
|
||
|
|
\e{Hx}{\bw}(n) & = (1-w_1-w_2) \e{Hx}{(0)}(n) + w_1 \e{Hx}{(1)}(n) + w_2 \e{Hx}{(2)}(n),
|
||
|
|
\\
|
||
|
|
\e{c}{\bw}(n) & = (1-w_1-w_2) \e{c}{(0)}(n) + w_1 \e{c}{(1)}(n) + w_2 \e{c}{(2)}(n)
|
||
|
|
\\
|
||
|
|
\e{Hxc}{\bw}(n) & = \e{Hx}{\bw}(n) + \e{c}{\bw}(n),
|
||
|
|
\end{align}
|
||
|
|
\end{subequations}
|
||
|
|
with $\bw = (w_1,w_2)$.
|
||
|
|
%For notational convenience, we also define the corresponding potentials as
|
||
|
|
%\begin{align}
|
||
|
|
% \v{Hx}{\bw}(n) & = n\,\e{Hx}{\bw}(n)
|
||
|
|
% &
|
||
|
|
% \v{c}{\bw}(n) & = n\,\e{c}{\bw}(n)
|
||
|
|
% &
|
||
|
|
% \v{Hxc}{\bw}(n) & = n\,\e{Hxc}{\bw}(n)
|
||
|
|
%\end{align}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In the "c-only" case, the individual energies can be extracted as follows
|
||
|
|
\begin{equation}
|
||
|
|
\begin{split}
|
||
|
|
E^{(I)} & = \frac{1}{2} \Tr[\bP{(I)} \cdot (\bH + \bF{(I)})]
|
||
|
|
\\
|
||
|
|
& + \int \qty{ \e{c}{\bw}[\n{\bw}(\br)] + \n{\bw}(\br) \left. \fdv{\e{c}{\bw}[\n{}]}{\n{}(\br)} \right|_{\n{} = \n{\bw}(\br)} } \n{(I)}(\br) d\br
|
||
|
|
\\
|
||
|
|
& + \LZ{c}{} + \DD{c}{(I)}.
|
||
|
|
\end{split}
|
||
|
|
\end{equation}
|
||
|
|
where $\bH$ is the core Hamiltonian, $\bF{(I)}$ and $\bP{(I)}$ are the Fock and the density matrix associated with the $I$th state and $\n{(I)}(\br)$ its corresponding density.
|
||
|
|
The correlation part of thr (state-independent) Levy-Zahariev shift and the so-called derivative discontinuity are given by
|
||
|
|
\begin{align}
|
||
|
|
\LZ{c}{} & = - \int \left. \fdv{\e{c}{\bw}[\n{}]}{\n{}(\br)} \right|_{\n{} = \n{\bw}(\br)} \n{\bw}(\br)^2 d\br,
|
||
|
|
\\
|
||
|
|
\DD{c}{(I)} & = \sum_{J>0} (\delta_{IJ} - w_J) \int \left. \pdv{\e{c}{\bw}[\n{}]}{w_J}\right|_{\n{} = \n{\bw}(\br)} \n{\bw}(\br) d\br
|
||
|
|
\end{align}
|
||
|
|
where we note that, by construction,
|
||
|
|
\begin{equation}
|
||
|
|
\left. \pdv{\e{c}{\bw}[\n{}]}{w_J}\right|_{\n{} = \n{\bw}(\br)} = \e{c}{(J)}[\n{\bw}(\br)] - \e{c}{(0)}[\n{\bw}(\br)]
|
||
|
|
\end{equation}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In the case of a "Hxc" functional, we have
|
||
|
|
\begin{equation}
|
||
|
|
\begin{split}
|
||
|
|
E^{(I)} & = \Tr[\bP{(I)} \cdot \bH]
|
||
|
|
\\
|
||
|
|
& + \int \qty{ \e{Hxc}{\bw}[\n{\bw}(\br)] + \n{\bw}(\br) \left. \fdv{\e{Hxc}{\bw}[\n{}]}{\n{}(\br)} \right|_{\n{} = \n{\bw}(\br)} } \n{(I)}(\br) d\br
|
||
|
|
\\
|
||
|
|
& + \LZ{Hxc}{} + \DD{Hxc}{(I)}.
|
||
|
|
\end{split}
|
||
|
|
\end{equation}
|
||
|
|
with
|
||
|
|
\begin{align}
|
||
|
|
\LZ{Hxc}{} & = - \int \left. \fdv{\e{Hxc}{\bw}[\n{}]}{\n{}(\br)} \right|_{\n{} = \n{\bw}(\br)} \n{\bw}(\br)^2 d\br,
|
||
|
|
\\
|
||
|
|
\DD{Hxc}{(I)} & = \sum_{J>0} (\delta_{IJ} - w_J) \int \left. \pdv{\e{Hxc}{\bw}[\n{}]}{w_J}\right|_{\n{} = \n{\bw}(\br)} \n{\bw}(\br) d\br
|
||
|
|
\end{align}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
|
\subsection{Implementation}
|
||
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
%%% FIGURE 1 %%%
|
||
|
|
\begin{figure}
|
||
|
|
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
|
||
|
|
\Procedure{Optical Gap}{}
|
||
|
|
\State
|
||
|
|
\While{}
|
||
|
|
\State
|
||
|
|
\State
|
||
|
|
% \For{}
|
||
|
|
% \State
|
||
|
|
% \EndFor
|
||
|
|
\EndWhile
|
||
|
|
% \If{}
|
||
|
|
% \State
|
||
|
|
% \EndIf
|
||
|
|
\EndProcedure
|
||
|
|
\end{algorithmic}
|
||
|
|
\caption{
|
||
|
|
\label{fig:algo_OG}
|
||
|
|
Pseudo-code for the calculation of the optical gap within eDFT.
|
||
|
|
$\tau$ is a user-defined threshold.
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
|
\section{Fundamental gap}
|
||
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
|
\subsection{The weight-dependent functional}
|
||
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Similarly to what have been done for the optical gap, one can design easily designed a weight-dependent correlation eDFA for the fundamental gap.
|
||
|
|
This time, our functional is based on the neutral ($I=0$), cation ($I=1$) and anion ($I=2$) species.
|
||
|
|
These systems contain respectively, one, two and three electrons.
|
||
|
|
Contrary to the optical gap, these three states have different densities which read
|
||
|
|
\begin{align}
|
||
|
|
\n{(0)} & = 2/(2\pi R),
|
||
|
|
&
|
||
|
|
\n{(1)} & = 1/(2\pi R),
|
||
|
|
&
|
||
|
|
\n{(2)} & = 3/(2\pi R).
|
||
|
|
\end{align}
|
||
|
|
Their reduced Hartree+exchange (Hx) energy are given by
|
||
|
|
\begin{align}
|
||
|
|
\e{Hx}{(0)}(n) & = n,
|
||
|
|
&
|
||
|
|
\e{Hx}{(1)}(n) & = 0,
|
||
|
|
&
|
||
|
|
\e{Hx}{(2)}(n) & = 40 n/27.
|
||
|
|
\end{align}
|
||
|
|
The expression of the correlation functional is identical to the previous case
|
||
|
|
\begin{equation}
|
||
|
|
\e{c}{(2)}(n) = \frac{a^{(2)}\,n}{n + b^{(2)} \sqrt{n} + c^{(2)}}
|
||
|
|
\end{equation}
|
||
|
|
where the coefficients are reported in Table \ref{tab:OG_func}.
|
||
|
|
We note that $\e{c}{(0)}$ has been defined in the previous section and the one-electron cationic system has $\e{c}{(1)}(n) = 0$.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
%%% TABLE 2 %%%
|
||
|
|
\begin{table*}
|
||
|
|
\caption{\label{tab:OG_func}
|
||
|
|
Parameters of the correlation functional for the optical gap.}
|
||
|
|
\begin{ruledtabular}
|
||
|
|
\begin{tabular}{lcddd}
|
||
|
|
State & $I$ & \mcc{$a^{(I)}$} & \mcc{$b^{(I)}$} & \mcc{$c^{(I)}$} \\
|
||
|
|
\hline
|
||
|
|
Neutral & 0 & -0.0137078 & 0.0748000 & 0.0566294 \\
|
||
|
|
Cation & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
|
||
|
|
Anion & 2 & -0.0184842 & 0.0896216 & 0.0175732 \\
|
||
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
||
|
|
\end{ruledtabular}
|
||
|
|
\end{table*}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Because of their difference in density, one needs to accommodate the weights in order to create a density-fixed eDFA.
|
||
|
|
We have chosen the following form:
|
||
|
|
\begin{equation}
|
||
|
|
\e{c}{\bw}(n) = \qty(1 - \frac{N-1}{N} w_1 - \frac{N+1}{N} w_2) \e{c}{(0)} + w_1 \e{c}{(1)} + w_2 \e{c}{(2)}
|
||
|
|
\end{equation}
|
||
|
|
with, in our case, $N=2$.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In the case of "c" functional, the indivdual energies are given by
|
||
|
|
\begin{equation}
|
||
|
|
\begin{split}
|
||
|
|
E^{(I)} & = \frac{1}{2} \Tr[\bP{(I)} \cdot (\bH+\bF{(I)})]
|
||
|
|
\\
|
||
|
|
& + \int \qty{ \e{c}{\bw}[\n{\bw}(\br)] + \n{\bw}(\br) \left. \fdv{\e{c}{\bw}[\n{}]}{\n{}(\br)} \right|_{\n{} = \n{\bw}(\br)} } \n{(I)}(\br) d\br
|
||
|
|
\\
|
||
|
|
& + \LZ{c}{(I)} + \DD{c}{(I)}.
|
||
|
|
\end{split}
|
||
|
|
\end{equation}
|
||
|
|
where we note that, now, the Levy-Zahariev shift is state dependent.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
\begin{align}
|
||
|
|
\LZ{c}{(I)} & = - \int \left. \fdv{\e{c}{\bw}[\n{}]}{\n{}(\br)} \right|_{\n{} = \n{\bw}(\br)} \n{\bw}(\br)^2 d\br,
|
||
|
|
\\
|
||
|
|
\DD{c}{(I)} & = \sum_{J>0} (\delta_{IJ} - w_J) \int \left. \pdv{\e{c}{\bw}[\n{}]}{w_J}\right|_{\n{} = \n{\bw}(\br)} \n{\bw}(\br) d\br
|
||
|
|
\end{align}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In the case of a "Hxc" functional for the fundamental gap, we have similar expressions as for the optical gap.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
%%% FIGURE 2 %%%
|
||
|
|
\begin{figure}
|
||
|
|
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
|
||
|
|
\Procedure{Fundamental Gap}{}
|
||
|
|
\State
|
||
|
|
\While{}
|
||
|
|
\State
|
||
|
|
\State
|
||
|
|
% \For{}
|
||
|
|
% \State
|
||
|
|
% \EndFor
|
||
|
|
\EndWhile
|
||
|
|
% \If{}
|
||
|
|
% \State
|
||
|
|
% \EndIf
|
||
|
|
\EndProcedure
|
||
|
|
\end{algorithmic}
|
||
|
|
\caption{
|
||
|
|
\label{fig:algo_FG}
|
||
|
|
Pseudo-code for the calculation of the fundamental gap within eDFT.
|
||
|
|
$\tau$ is a user-defined threshold.
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
\end{figure}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
\end{document}
|