loos
/
SRGGW
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

minor modifications in si

This commit is contained in:
Antoine Marie 2023-05-15 14:41:44 +02:00
parent fe9b0b8038
commit ee90298e4a
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
Manuscript/si.tex
View File

@ -149,17 +149,17 @@
\end{figure*}
%%% %%% %%% %%%
In this section, the values of the two others SRG-based methods derived in the main manuscript are reported along with their corresponding histogram plot of the errors .
For the sake of completeness, the SRG-regularized quasi-particle equation used for the $G_0W_0$ and ev$GW$ calculations is reported here
In this section, the values obtained with the two alternative SRG-based methods derived in the main manuscript, SRG-$G_0W_0$ and SRG-ev$GW$, are reported along with their corresponding histogram plot of the errors.
For the sake of completeness, the SRG-regularized quasiparticle equation used for the $G_0W_0$ and ev$GW$ calculations is reported here
\begin{equation}
\epsilon_p^{\text{HF}} + \sum_{i\nu} \frac{W_{pi}^{\nu} W_{pi}^{\nu} }{\omega - \epsilon_i + \Omega_{\nu}}e^{-2(\epsilon_p - \epsilon_i + \Omega_{\nu})^2 s} + \sum_{a\nu} \frac{W_{pa}^{\nu} W_{pa}^{\nu}}{\omega - \epsilon_a - \Omega_{\nu}}e^{-2(\epsilon_p - \epsilon_a - \Omega_{\nu})^2 s} - \omega = 0,
\end{equation}
Therefore, the SRG-$G_0W_0$ values correspond to one-shot solutions of these equations (without linearization).
While the SRG-ev$GW$ results correspond to iterative solutions of these equations where self-consistency on the $\epsilon_p$ has been reached.
Table \ref{tab:tab1} shows that the SRG-$G_0W_0$ values are the same as the $G_0W_0$ ones for all systems (up to $\num{e-2}$\si{\electronvolt}).
One can observe in Tab.~\ref{tab:tab1} that the SRG-$G_0W_0$ values are the same as the $G_0W_0$ ones for all systems (up to $\num{e-2}$\si{\electronvolt}).
Figure \ref{fig:supporting} shows that ev$GW$ offers a slight improvement over $G_0W_0$ while SRG-ev$GW$ performs similarly to its traditional ev$GW$ counterpart.
One interesting fact to note is that the convergence of SRG-ev$GW$ deteriorates faster than for SRG-qs$GW$.
One interesting fact to note is that the convergence of SRG-ev$GW$ deteriorates faster than for SRG-qs$GW$ with respect to $s$.
This is probably due to the absence of the off-diagonal terms.
%%% TABLE I %%%