saving work (draft outline results)
This commit is contained in:
parent
d1c3decd4e
commit
b2e4951f2d
@ -751,7 +751,24 @@ In addition, the MgO and O3 molecules (which are part of GW100 as well) has been
|
||||
\end{figure*}
|
||||
%%% %%% %%% %%%
|
||||
|
||||
Draft of outline:
|
||||
|
||||
Discuss table 1 and fig4:
|
||||
black box convergence,
|
||||
mean value of s to reach plateau,
|
||||
increase of accuracy for no additional computational cost
|
||||
|
||||
Part on approximation and correction for W:
|
||||
TDA vs RPA,
|
||||
SRG TDA same accuracy as Sym RPA !,
|
||||
TDHF G0W0 not that bad in GW100 but bad in GW22, qsGW TDHF even worse even with SRG,
|
||||
Maybe that would be nice to add SRG G0W0 to see if it mitigates the outliers of GW20 cf Bruneval 2021,
|
||||
That would be nice to understand clearly why qsGWTDHF is worse (screening, gap, etc)
|
||||
|
||||
Part on EA:
|
||||
MgO- does not converge yet but when we have it same analysis as Table 1 and Fig 4 but for the EA
|
||||
|
||||
Not sure that we need anything more, let's see once this is written
|
||||
|
||||
%=================================================================%
|
||||
\section{Conclusion}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user