validate ant
This commit is contained in:
parent
0341e5cdf7
commit
b04c90c8d8
@ -665,8 +665,8 @@ Then the accuracy of the IP yielded by the traditional and SRG schemes will be s
|
||||
%%% %%% %%% %%%
|
||||
|
||||
This section starts by considering a prototypical molecular system, \ie the water molecule, in the aug-cc-pVTZ cartesian basis set.
|
||||
Figure~\ref{fig:fig2} shows the error of various methods for the principal IP with respect to the CCSD(T) reference value.
|
||||
\ant{The HF IP (dashed black line) is overestimated, this is a consequence of the missing correlation and the lack of orbital relaxation for the cation, a result which is now well understood.} \cite{SzaboBook,Lewis_2019}
|
||||
Figure \ref{fig:fig2} shows the error of various methods for the principal IP with respect to the CCSD(T) reference value.
|
||||
The HF IP (dashed black line) is overestimated; this is a consequence of the missing correlation and the lack of orbital relaxation for the cation, a result that is well understood. \cite{SzaboBook,Lewis_2019}
|
||||
The usual qs$GW$ scheme (dashed blue line) brings a quantitative improvement as the IP is now within \SI{0.3}{\electronvolt} of the reference.
|
||||
|
||||
Figure~\ref{fig:fig2} also displays the SRG-qs$GW$ IP as a function of the flow parameter (blue curve).
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user