warning
This commit is contained in:
parent
76e18eec87
commit
9e64bb6f4a
@ -494,6 +494,8 @@ which gives
|
||||
\end{multline}
|
||||
This term brings the direct part of the pp and eh $T$-matrix terms.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The last term, $\cK_\Gamma$, is more tricky, as it requires a non-trivial vertex as an input.
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\begin{split}
|
||||
@ -515,9 +517,11 @@ By setting $\cK = \cK_G = \ii W$ and $\fdv*{\cK}{G} = 0$, we get
|
||||
+ G(54)G(43)G(32) \Big]
|
||||
\end{multline}
|
||||
which is analogous to Eq.~\eqref{eq:Gamma_W} upon exchange.
|
||||
hence, this term brings the exchange part of the pp and eh $T$-matrix terms.
|
||||
Hence, this term brings the exchange part of the pp and eh $T$-matrix terms.
|
||||
Topological novel diagrams are exclusively introduced by this term.
|
||||
|
||||
\titou{I think there are some typos in the indices throughout the paper.}
|
||||
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
\acknowledgements{
|
||||
This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant agreement No.~863481).}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user