all PT-SRG equations of Evangelista 2014 written in details

This commit is contained in:
Antoine Marie 2022-10-05 10:49:08 +02:00
parent fb7d6f9624
commit 8603722476

View File

@ -147,19 +147,18 @@
\maketitle \maketitle
%=================================================================%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Introduction} \section{Introduction}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %=================================================================%
The aim of this document is two-fold. The aim of this document is two-fold.
First, we want to re-derive the perturbative analysis of the similarity renormalisation group (SRG) formalism applied to the non-relativistic electronic Hamiltonian. First, we want to re-derive the perturbative analysis of the similarity renormalisation group (SRG) formalism applied to the non-relativistic electronic Hamiltonian.
In a second time, we want to apply the same formalism to the unfolded GW Hamiltonian. In a second time, we want to apply the same formalism to the unfolded GW Hamiltonian.
Before jumping into these analysis, we do a brief presentation of the SRG formalism. Before jumping into these analysis, we do a brief presentation of the SRG formalism.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %=================================================================%
\section{The similarity renormalisation group} \section{The similarity renormalisation group}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %=================================================================%
The similarity renormalization group aims at continuously transforming an Hamiltonian to a diagonal form, or more often to a block-diagonal form. The similarity renormalization group aims at continuously transforming an Hamiltonian to a diagonal form, or more often to a block-diagonal form.
Therefore, the transformed Hamiltonian Therefore, the transformed Hamiltonian
@ -200,9 +199,9 @@ This generator has the advantage of defining a true renormalisation scheme, \ie
One of the flaws of this generator is that it generates a stiff set of ODE which is difficult to solve numerically. One of the flaws of this generator is that it generates a stiff set of ODE which is difficult to solve numerically.
However, here we consider analytical perturbative expressions so we will not be affected by this problem. However, here we consider analytical perturbative expressions so we will not be affected by this problem.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %=================================================================%
\section{The electronic Hamiltonian} \section{The electronic Hamiltonian}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %=================================================================%
In this part, we derive the perturbative expression for the SRG applied to the non-relativistic electronic Hamiltonian In this part, we derive the perturbative expression for the SRG applied to the non-relativistic electronic Hamiltonian
\begin{equation} \begin{equation}
@ -219,7 +218,7 @@ In this case, we want to decouple the reference determinant from every singly an
Hence, we define the off-diagonal Hamiltonian as Hence, we define the off-diagonal Hamiltonian as
\begin{equation} \begin{equation}
\label{eq:hamiltonianOffDiagonal} \label{eq:hamiltonianOffDiagonal}
\hH^{\text{od}}(s) = \sum_{ia} + f_i^a(s)\no{a}{i} + \frac{1}{4} \sum_{ijab}v(s)_{ij}^{ab}\no{ab}{ij}. \hH^{\text{od}}(s) = \sum_{ia} f_i^a(s)\no{a}{i} + \frac{1}{4} \sum_{ijab}v(s)_{ij}^{ab}\no{ab}{ij}.
\end{equation} \end{equation}
Note that each coefficients depend on $s$. Note that each coefficients depend on $s$.
@ -239,6 +238,11 @@ Now, we want to compute the terms at each order of the following development
\bH(s) = \bH^{(0)}(s) + \bH^{(1)}(s) + \bH^{(2)}(s) + \bH^{(3)}(s) + \dots \bH(s) = \bH^{(0)}(s) + \bH^{(1)}(s) + \bH^{(2)}(s) + \bH^{(3)}(s) + \dots
\end{equation} \end{equation}
by integrating Eq.~\eqref{eq:flowEquation}. by integrating Eq.~\eqref{eq:flowEquation}.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection{Zeroth order Hamiltonian}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
First, we start by showing that the zeroth order Hamiltonian is independant of $s$ and therefore equal to $\bH^{(0)}(0)$ First, we start by showing that the zeroth order Hamiltonian is independant of $s$ and therefore equal to $\bH^{(0)}(0)$
\begin{align} \begin{align}
\bH(\delta s) &= \bH(0) + \delta s \dv{\bH(s)}{s}\bigg|_{s=0} + O(\delta s^2) \\ \bH(\delta s) &= \bH(0) + \delta s \dv{\bH(s)}{s}\bigg|_{s=0} + O(\delta s^2) \\
@ -252,6 +256,10 @@ Which gives us the following equality
\end{equation} \end{equation}
meaning that the zeroth order Hamiltonian is independant of $s$. meaning that the zeroth order Hamiltonian is independant of $s$.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection{First order Hamiltonian}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
The right-hand side of \eqref{eq:flowEquation} has no zeroth order, so we want to compute its first order term. The right-hand side of \eqref{eq:flowEquation} has no zeroth order, so we want to compute its first order term.
To do so, we first need to compute the first order term of $\boldsymbol{\eta}(s)$. To do so, we first need to compute the first order term of $\boldsymbol{\eta}(s)$.
We have seen that $\bH^\text{od}(0)$ has no zeroth order contribution so we have We have seen that $\bH^\text{od}(0)$ has no zeroth order contribution so we have
@ -262,31 +270,104 @@ According to the appendix the one-body part of $\boldsymbol{\eta}^{(1)}(s) $ has
In addition, the term $\left[A_{1}, B_{2}\right]_{p}^{q}$ involves the coefficients $A_i^a = f_i^a(0) = 0$. In addition, the term $\left[A_{1}, B_{2}\right]_{p}^{q}$ involves the coefficients $A_i^a = f_i^a(0) = 0$.
So finally we only have one term So finally we only have one term
\begin{align} \begin{align}
\eta_a^{i,(1)}(s) &= \comm{\bH_1^{\text{d},(0)}(0)}{\bH_1^{\text{od},(1)}(s)} \\ \eta_a^{i,(1)}(s) &= \comm{\bH_1^{\text{d},(0)}(0)}{\bH_1^{\text{od},(1)}(s)}_a^i \\
&= \sum_r \left( f_a^r(0) f_r^{i,(1)}(s) - f_r^i(0) f_a^{r,(1)}(s) \right) \\ &= \sum_r \left( f_a^r(0) f_r^{i,(1)}(s) - f_r^i(0) f_a^{r,(1)}(s) \right) \\
&= (\epsilon_a - \epsilon_i)f_a^{i,(1)}(s) &= (\epsilon_a - \epsilon_i)f_a^{i,(1)}(s)
\end{align} \end{align}
Now turning to the two-body part of $\boldsymbol{\eta}^{(1)}(s) $ and once again two terms are zero because the two-body part of $\bH^{\text{d},(0)}(0)$ is equal to zero. Now turning to the two-body part of $\boldsymbol{\eta}^{(1)}(s) $ and once again two terms are zero because the two-body part of $\bH^{\text{d},(0)}(0)$ is equal to zero.
So we have So we have
\begin{align} \begin{align}
\eta_{ab}^{ij,(1)}(s) &= \comm{\bH_1^{\text{d},(0)}(0)}{\bH_2^{\text{od},(1)}(s)} \\ \eta_{ab}^{ij,(1)}(s) &= \comm{\bH_1^{\text{d},(0)}(0)}{\bH_2^{\text{od},(1)}(s)}_{ab}^{ij} \\
&= \sum_t [P(ab) f_a^t(0) v_{tb}^{ij,(1)}(s) - P(ij) f_t^i(0) v_{ab}^{tj,(1)}(s) ] \\ &= \sum_t [P(ab) f_a^t(0) v_{tb}^{ij,(1)}(s) - P(ij) f_t^i(0) v_{ab}^{tj,(1)}(s) ] \notag \\
&= \sum_t [ P(ab) \epsilon_a \delta_{at}v_{tb}^{ij,(1)}(s) - P(ij) \epsilon_i \delta_{it} v_{ab}^{tj,(1)}(s) ] \\ &= \sum_t [ P(ab) \epsilon_a \delta_{at}v_{tb}^{ij,(1)}(s) - P(ij) \epsilon_i \delta_{it} v_{ab}^{tj,(1)}(s) ] \notag \\
&= P(ab) \epsilon_a v_{ab}^{ij,(1)}(s) - P(ij) \epsilon_i v_{ab}^{ij,(1)}(s) \\ &= P(ab) \epsilon_a v_{ab}^{ij,(1)}(s) - P(ij) \epsilon_i v_{ab}^{ij,(1)}(s) \notag\\
&= \left( \epsilon_a + \epsilon_b - \epsilon_i - \epsilon_j \right) v_{ab}^{ij,(1)} &= \left( \epsilon_a + \epsilon_b - \epsilon_i - \epsilon_j \right) v_{ab}^{ij,(1)} \notag
\end{align} \end{align}
WIP... We can now compute the first order contribution to Eq.~\eqref{eq:flowEquation}. We have seen that $\eta$ has no zeroth order contribution so
\begin{equation}
\dv{\bH^{(1)}(s)}{s} = \comm{\boldsymbol{\eta}^{(1)}(s)}{\bH^{(0)}(s)}
\end{equation}
We start with the scalar contribution, \ie the PT1 energy
\begin{equation}
\dv{E_0^{(1)}(s)}{s} = \mel{\phi}{\comm{\boldsymbol{\eta}_1^{(1)}(s)}{\bH_1^{(0)}(s)}}{\phi} + \mel{\phi}{\comm{\boldsymbol{\eta}_2^{(1)}(s)}{\bH_2^{(0)}(s)}}{\phi}
\end{equation}
where the second term is equal to zero.
Thus we have
\begin{align}
\label{eq:diffEqScalPT1}
\dv{E_0^{(1)}(s)}{s} &= \sum_{ip}\eta_i^{p,(1)}f_p^i(0) - \eta_p^{i,(1)}f_i^p(0) \\
&= \sum_i \epsilon_i(\eta_i^{i,(1)} - \eta_i^{i,(1)}) \notag \\
&= 0 \notag
\end{align}
Using the exact same reasoning as above we can show that there is only of the four terms of the one-body part of the commutator that is non-zero.
\begin{align}
\dv{f_a^{i,(1)}(s)}{s} &= \comm{\boldsymbol{\eta}_1^{(1)}(s)}{\bH_1^{(0)}(s)}_a^i \\
&= \sum_r \eta_a^{r,(1)}(s)f_r^i(0) - \eta_r^{i,(1)}f_a^r(0) \notag \\
&= (\epsilon_i - \epsilon_a) \eta_a^{i,(1)}(s) \notag \\
&= -(\epsilon_i - \epsilon_a) ^2f_a^{i,(1)}(s) \notag
\end{align}
The derivation for the two-body part to first order is once again similar
\begin{align}
\dv{v_{ab}^{ij,(1)}(s)}{s} &= \comm{\boldsymbol{\eta}_2^{(1)}(s)}{\bH_1^{(0)}(s)}_{ab}^{ij} \\
&= -(\epsilon_i + \epsilon_j - \epsilon_a - \epsilon_b) ^2v_{ab}^{ij,(1)}(s) \notag
\end{align}
These three differential equations can be integrated to obtain the analytical form of the Hamiltonian coefficients up to first order of perturbation theory.
\begin{align}
E_0^{(1)}(s) &= E_0^{(1)}(0) = 0 \\
f_a^{i,(1)}(s) &= f_a^{i,(1)}(0) e^{-s (\Delta_a^i )^2} = 0 \\
v_{ab}^{ij,(1)}(s) &= v_{ab}^{ij,(1)}(0) e^{-s (\Delta_{ab}^{ij})^2} = \aeri{ij}{ab} e^{-s (\Delta_{ab}^{ij})^2}
\end{align}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{The unfolded GW Hamiltonian} \subsection{Second order Hamiltonian}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
To compute the second order contribution to the Hamiltonian coefficients, we first need to compute the second order contribution to $\boldsymbol{\eta}(s)$.
\begin{equation}
\boldsymbol{\eta}^{(2)}(s) = \comm{\bH^{\text{d},(0)}(0)}{\bH^{\text{od},(2)}(s)} + \comm{\bH^{\text{d},(1)}(s)}{\bH^{\text{od},(1)}(s)}
\end{equation}
The expressions for the first commutator are computed analogously to the one of the previous subsection.
We focus on deriving expressions for the second term.
The one-body part of $\bH^{\text{od},(1)}(s)$ is equal to zero so two of the four terms contributing to the one-body part of $\comm{\bH^{\text{d},(1)}(s)}{\bH^{\text{od},(1)}(s)}$ are zero.
In addition, the term $\comm{A_1}{B_2}$ is equal to zero as well because the coefficients $A_{1,i}^a$ are zero (see expression in Appendix).
So we have
\begin{align}
\eta_a^{i,(2)}(s) &= \comm{\bH_1^{\text{d},(0)}(0)}{\bH_1^{\text{od},(2)}(s)}_a^i + \comm{\bH_2^{\text{d},(1)}(s)}{\bH_2^{\text{od},(1)}(s)}_a^i \\
&= (\epsilon_a - \epsilon_i)f_a^{i,(2)}(s) + \dots
\end{align}
Need to continue this derivation but this not needed for EPT2.
Now turning to the differential equations, we start by computing the scalar part of Eq.~\eqref{eq:flowEquation}, \ie the differential equation for the second order energy.
\begin{align}
\dv{E_0^{(2)}(s)}{s} & = \mel{\phi}{\comm{\boldsymbol{\eta}_1^{(2)}(s)}{\bH_1^{(0)}(s)}}{\phi} + \mel{\phi}{\comm{\boldsymbol{\eta}_2^{(2)}(s)}{\bH_2^{(0)}(s)}}{\phi} \\
&+ \mel{\phi}{\comm{\boldsymbol{\eta}_1^{(1)}(s)}{\bH_1^{(1)}(s)}}{\phi} + \mel{\phi}{\comm{\boldsymbol{\eta}_2^{(1)}(s)}{\bH_2^{(1)}(s)}}{\phi}
\end{align}
The two first terms are equal to zero for the same reason as the PT1 scalar differential equation (see Eq.~\eqref{eq:diffEqScalPT1}).
In addition, the one-body hamiltonian has no first order contribution so
\begin{align}
\dv{E_0^{(2)}(s)}{s} &= \mel{\phi}{\comm{\boldsymbol{\eta}_2^{(1)}(s)}{\bH_2^{(1)}(s)}}{\phi} \\
&= \frac{1}{4} \sum_{i j} \sum_{a b}\left(\eta_{i j}^{ab,(1)} H_{ab}^{i j,(1)} - H_{i j}^{ab,(1)} \eta_{ab}^{i j,(1)}\right) \\
&=\frac{1}{4} \sum_{i j} \sum_{a b}\left(\eta_{i j}^{ab,(1)} - \eta_{ab}^{i j,(1)}\right) v_{ab}^{ij,(1)} \\
&= \frac{1}{4} \sum_{i j} \sum_{a b}\left(\Delta_{ab}^{ij}v_{ij}^{ab,(1)} - (-\Delta_{ab}^{ij} v_{ab}^{ij,(1)}) \right) \aeri{ij}{ab} e^{-s (\Delta_{ab}^{ij})^2} \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \sum_{i j} \sum_{a b} \Delta_{ab}^{ij} (v_{ab}^{ij,(1)})^2 \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \sum_{i j} \sum_{a b} \Delta_{ab}^{ij} \aeri{ij}{ab}^2 e^{-2s (\Delta_{ab}^{ij})^2}
\end{align}
After integration, using the initial condition $E_0^{(2)}(0)=0$, we obtain
\begin{equation}
E_0^{(2)}(s) = \frac{1}{4} \sum_{i j} \sum_{a b} \frac{\Delta_{ab}^{ij}}{\aeri{ij}{ab}}\left(1-e^{-2s (\Delta_{ab}^{ij})^2}\right)
\end{equation}
%=================================================================%
\section{The unfolded GW Hamiltonian}
%=================================================================%
\appendix \appendix
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %=================================================================%
\section{Matrix elements of $C=[A, B]_{1,2}$} \section{Matrix elements of $C=[A, B]_{1,2}$}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %=================================================================%
An operator $A$ containing at most two-body terms may be written in normal ordered form with respect to the reference $\Phi$ as An operator $A$ containing at most two-body terms may be written in normal ordered form with respect to the reference $\Phi$ as