saving work in results

Manuscript/SRGGW.tex

@@ -544,9 +544,42 @@ This means that the cations used an unrestricted HF reference while the neutral
 \label{sec:results}
 %=================================================================%
 
+The results section is divided in two parts.
+The first step will be to analyse in depth the behavior of the two static self-energy approximations in a few test cases.
+Then the accuracy of the IP yielded by the Sym and SRG schemes will be statistically gauged over a test set of molecules.
+
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+\subsection{Flow parameter dependence of the SRG/Sym-qs$GW$/GF(2) schemes}
+\label{sec:flow_param_dep}
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 
+
+%%% FIG 1 %%%
+\begin{figure*}
+  \centering
+  \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fig1.pdf}
+  \caption{
+    This figure is terrible, I will clean it. I put it here just to start writing the results discussion. Maybe fig 1 with only He and Ne but also the $\eta$ evolution because possible to converge for these molecules. Then figure 2 with H2O and BeO with SRG GW and SRG GF(2).
+    \label{fig:fig1}}
+\end{figure*}
+%%% %%% %%% %%%
+
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+\subsection{Comparison of the Sym-qs and SRG-qs approximations}
+\label{sec:SRG_vs_Sym}
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+The test set considered in this study is composed of the GW20 set of molecules introduced by Berkelbach \ant{check ref} and co-workers.
+This set is made of the 20 smallest molecules of the GW100 benchmark set.
+We also added the MgO and O3 molecules which are part of GW100 and are known to be difficult to converged for qs$GW$.
+In addition, we considered the Quest 1 and 2 sets which is made of small and medium size organic molecules.
+
+
+%=================================================================%
 \section{Conclusion}
-%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+\label{sec:conclusion}
+%=================================================================%
+
 Here comes the conclusion.
 
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%