abstract
This commit is contained in:
parent
a8e74e36f9
commit
4c2393f024
@ -62,8 +62,8 @@
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{document}
|
\begin{document}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% \title{A Similarity Renormalization Group Approach To Many-Body Perturbation Theory}
|
\title{A similarity renormalization group approach to Green's function methods}
|
||||||
\title{Tackling The Intruder-State Problem In Many-Body Perturbation Theory: A Similarity Renormalization Group Approach/Perspective}
|
%\title{Tackling The Intruder-State Problem In Many-Body Perturbation Theory: A Similarity Renormalization Group Approach/Perspective}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\author{Antoine \surname{Marie}}
|
\author{Antoine \surname{Marie}}
|
||||||
\email{amarie@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr}
|
\email{amarie@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr}
|
||||||
@ -74,7 +74,12 @@
|
|||||||
\affiliation{\LCPQ}
|
\affiliation{\LCPQ}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{abstract}
|
\begin{abstract}
|
||||||
Here comes the abstract.
|
The family of Green's function methods based on the $GW$ approximation has gained popularity in the electronic structure theory thanks to its accuracy in weakly correlated systems and its affordability.
|
||||||
|
Despite this, self-consistent versions still pose challenges in terms of convergence.
|
||||||
|
A recent study \href{https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0089317}{[J. Chem. Phys. 156, 231101 (2022)]} has linked these convergence issues to the intruder-state problem.
|
||||||
|
In this work, a perturbative analysis of the similarity renormalization group (SRG) approach is performed on Green's function methods.
|
||||||
|
The resulting SRG-based regularized self-energy significantly accelerates the convergence of self-consistent $GW$ methods.
|
||||||
|
Furthermore, it enables us to derive, from first principles, the expression of a new naturally Hermitian form of the static self-energy that can be employed in quasiparticle self-consistent $GW$ (qs$GW$) calculations.
|
||||||
%\bigskip
|
%\bigskip
|
||||||
%\begin{center}
|
%\begin{center}
|
||||||
% \boxed{\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{TOC}}
|
% \boxed{\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{TOC}}
|
||||||
@ -101,7 +106,6 @@ The $GW$ method approximates the self-energy $\Sigma$ which relates the exact in
|
|||||||
\end{equation}
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
where $1 = (\bx_1, t_1)$ is a composite coordinate gathering spin-space and time variables.
|
where $1 = (\bx_1, t_1)$ is a composite coordinate gathering spin-space and time variables.
|
||||||
The self-energy encapsulates all the Hartree-exchange-correlation effects which are not taken into account in the reference system.
|
The self-energy encapsulates all the Hartree-exchange-correlation effects which are not taken into account in the reference system.
|
||||||
%Throughout this manuscript the references are chosen to be the Hartree-Fock (HF) ones so that the self-energy only account for the missing correlation.
|
|
||||||
Approximating $\Sigma$ as the first-order term of its perturbative expansion with respect to the screened Coulomb potential $W$ yields the so-called $GW$ approximation \cite{Hedin_1965,Martin_2016}
|
Approximating $\Sigma$ as the first-order term of its perturbative expansion with respect to the screened Coulomb potential $W$ yields the so-called $GW$ approximation \cite{Hedin_1965,Martin_2016}
|
||||||
\begin{equation}
|
\begin{equation}
|
||||||
\label{eq:gw_selfenergy}
|
\label{eq:gw_selfenergy}
|
||||||
@ -535,7 +539,7 @@ This transformation is done gradually starting from the states that have the lar
|
|||||||
\centering
|
\centering
|
||||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fig1.pdf}
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fig1.pdf}
|
||||||
\caption{
|
\caption{
|
||||||
Add caption
|
Functional form of the qs$GW$ self-energy (left) for $\eta = 1$ and the SRG-$GW$ self-energy (right) for $s = 1/(2\eta^2)$.
|
||||||
\label{fig:fig1}}
|
\label{fig:fig1}}
|
||||||
\end{figure*}
|
\end{figure*}
|
||||||
%%% %%% %%% %%%
|
%%% %%% %%% %%%
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user