two minor corrections in conclusion
This commit is contained in:
parent
f1f42752b5
commit
183dd42a5a
@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ The problems caused by intruder states in many-body perturbation theory are nume
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
SRG's central equation is the flow equation, which is usually solved numerically but can be solved analytically for low perturbation order.
|
SRG's central equation is the flow equation, which is usually solved numerically but can be solved analytically for low perturbation order.
|
||||||
Applying this approach in the $GW$ context yields analytical renormalized expressions for the Fock matrix elements and the screened two-electron integrals.
|
Applying this approach in the $GW$ context yields analytical renormalized expressions for the Fock matrix elements and the screened two-electron integrals.
|
||||||
These renormalized quantities lead to a renormalized $GW$ quasiparticle equation, referred to as SRG-$GW$, which is the main result of this work.
|
These renormalized quantities lead to a regularized $GW$ quasiparticle equation, referred to as SRG-$GW$, which is the main result of this work.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
By isolating the static component of SRG-$GW$, we obtain an alternative Hermitian and intruder-state-free self-energy that can be used in the context of qs$GW$ calculations.
|
By isolating the static component of SRG-$GW$, we obtain an alternative Hermitian and intruder-state-free self-energy that can be used in the context of qs$GW$ calculations.
|
||||||
This new variant is called SRG-qs$GW$.
|
This new variant is called SRG-qs$GW$.
|
||||||
@ -927,7 +927,7 @@ Additionally, we demonstrate how SRG-$GW$ can effectively resolve the discontinu
|
|||||||
This provides a first-principles justification for the SRG-inspired regularizer proposed in Ref.~\onlinecite{Monino_2022}.
|
This provides a first-principles justification for the SRG-inspired regularizer proposed in Ref.~\onlinecite{Monino_2022}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We first study the flow parameter dependence of the SRG-qs$GW$ IPs for a few test cases.
|
We first study the flow parameter dependence of the SRG-qs$GW$ IPs for a few test cases.
|
||||||
The results show that the IPs gradually evolve from the HF starting point at $s=0$ to a plateau value for $s\to\infty$ that is much closer to the CCSD(T) reference than the HF initial value.
|
The results show that the IPs gradually evolve from the HF starting point at $s=0$ to a plateau value for $s\to\infty$ that is much closer to the $\Delta$CCSD(T) reference than the HF initial value.
|
||||||
For small values of the flow parameter, the SRG-qs$GW$ IPs are actually worse than their starting point.
|
For small values of the flow parameter, the SRG-qs$GW$ IPs are actually worse than their starting point.
|
||||||
Therefore, it is advisable to use the largest possible value of $s$, similar to qs$GW$ calculations where one needs to use the smallest possible $\eta$ value.
|
Therefore, it is advisable to use the largest possible value of $s$, similar to qs$GW$ calculations where one needs to use the smallest possible $\eta$ value.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user