diff --git a/Revision/ExPerspective.tex b/Revision/ExPerspective.tex
index 58a3f33..36a0206 100644
--- a/Revision/ExPerspective.tex
+++ b/Revision/ExPerspective.tex
@@ -370,6 +370,7 @@ In summary, each method has its own strengths and weaknesses, and none of them i
 \begin{figure*}
 	\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{QUEST1}
 	\caption{\hl{Mean absolute error (MAE, top) and mean signed error (MSE, bottom)} with respect to the TBE/\textit{aug}-cc-pVTZ values from the {\SetA} set (as described in Ref.~\citenum{Loo18a}) for various methods and types of excited states. 
+	\hl{The corresponding graph for the maximum positive and negative errors can be found in the} {\SI}.
 	}
 	\label{fig:Set1}
 \end{figure*}
@@ -388,7 +389,9 @@ In summary, each method has its own strengths and weaknesses, and none of them i
 %%% FIG 3 %%%
 \begin{figure*}
 	\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{QUEST3}
-	\caption{\hl{Mean absolute error (MAE, top) and mean signed error (MSE, bottom)} with respect to the TBE/\textit{aug}-cc-pVTZ values from the {\SetC} set (as described in Ref.~\citenum{Loo20a}) for various methods and types of excited states.}
+	\caption{\hl{Mean absolute error (MAE, top) and mean signed error (MSE, bottom)} with respect to the TBE/\textit{aug}-cc-pVTZ values from the {\SetC} set (as described in Ref.~\citenum{Loo20a}) for various methods and types of excited states.
+	\hl{The corresponding graph for the maximum positive and negative errors can be found in the} {\SI}.
+	}
 	\label{fig:Set3}
 \end{figure*}
 %%% %%% %%%