response letter with clotilde comments
This commit is contained in:
parent
63817357a2
commit
cf6aef0668
@ -1,13 +1,23 @@
|
|||||||
%% This BibTeX bibliography file was created using BibDesk.
|
%% This BibTeX bibliography file was created using BibDesk.
|
||||||
%% http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/
|
%% http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%% Created for Pierre-Francois Loos at 2020-05-10 19:45:36 +0200
|
%% Created for Pierre-Francois Loos at 2020-05-19 16:23:00 +0200
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%% Saved with string encoding Unicode (UTF-8)
|
%% Saved with string encoding Unicode (UTF-8)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@article{Fromager_2020,
|
||||||
|
Archiveprefix = {arXiv},
|
||||||
|
Author = {Emmanuel Fromager},
|
||||||
|
Date-Added = {2020-05-13 07:41:14 +0200},
|
||||||
|
Date-Modified = {2020-05-13 07:41:14 +0200},
|
||||||
|
Eprint = {2001.08605},
|
||||||
|
Primaryclass = {physics.chem-ph},
|
||||||
|
Title = {Individual correlations in ensemble density-functional theory: State-driven/density-driven decomposition without additional Kohn-Sham systems},
|
||||||
|
Year = {2020}}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@article{Refaely-Abramson_2012,
|
@article{Refaely-Abramson_2012,
|
||||||
Author = {Sivan Refaely-Abramson and Sahar Sharifzadeh and Niranjan Govind and Jochen Autschbach and Jeffrey B. Neaton and Roi Baer and Leeor Kronik},
|
Author = {Sivan Refaely-Abramson and Sahar Sharifzadeh and Niranjan Govind and Jochen Autschbach and Jeffrey B. Neaton and Roi Baer and Leeor Kronik},
|
||||||
Date-Added = {2020-05-03 21:27:34 +0200},
|
Date-Added = {2020-05-03 21:27:34 +0200},
|
||||||
@ -252,14 +262,14 @@
|
|||||||
Bdsk-Url-1 = {https://github.com/LCPQ/quantum_package},
|
Bdsk-Url-1 = {https://github.com/LCPQ/quantum_package},
|
||||||
Bdsk-Url-2 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.200970}}
|
Bdsk-Url-2 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.200970}}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@article{Fromager_2020,
|
@article{Loos_2020,
|
||||||
Archiveprefix = {arXiv},
|
Archiveprefix = {arXiv},
|
||||||
Author = {Emmanuel Fromager},
|
Author = {P. F. Loos and E. Fromager},
|
||||||
Date-Added = {2020-04-08 14:13:18 +0200},
|
Date-Added = {2020-04-08 14:13:18 +0200},
|
||||||
Date-Modified = {2020-04-08 14:13:18 +0200},
|
Date-Modified = {2020-05-13 07:41:52 +0200},
|
||||||
Eprint = {2001.08605},
|
Eprint = {2003.05553},
|
||||||
Primaryclass = {physics.chem-ph},
|
Primaryclass = {physics.chem-ph},
|
||||||
Title = {Individual correlations in ensemble density-functional theory: State-driven/density-driven decomposition without additional Kohn-Sham systems},
|
Title = {A weight-dependent local correlation density-functional approximation for ensembles},
|
||||||
Year = {2020}}
|
Year = {2020}}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@article{Bottcher_1974,
|
@article{Bottcher_1974,
|
||||||
@ -328,15 +338,6 @@
|
|||||||
Volume = {112},
|
Volume = {112},
|
||||||
Year = {2008}}
|
Year = {2008}}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@article{Loos_2020,
|
|
||||||
Author = {P. F. Loos and E. Fromager},
|
|
||||||
Date-Added = {2020-04-07 10:59:44 +0200},
|
|
||||||
Date-Modified = {2020-04-07 11:01:30 +0200},
|
|
||||||
Journal = {J. Chem. Phys.},
|
|
||||||
Pages = {arXiv:2003.05553},
|
|
||||||
Title = {A weight-dependent local correlation density-functional approximation for ensembles},
|
|
||||||
Year = {submitted}}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@article{Lindh_2001,
|
@article{Lindh_2001,
|
||||||
Author = {R. Lindh and P.-A. Malmqvist and L. Gagliardi},
|
Author = {R. Lindh and P.-A. Malmqvist and L. Gagliardi},
|
||||||
Date-Added = {2020-03-30 09:59:22 +0200},
|
Date-Added = {2020-03-30 09:59:22 +0200},
|
||||||
@ -5267,10 +5268,10 @@
|
|||||||
Volume = {41},
|
Volume = {41},
|
||||||
Year = {1990}}
|
Year = {1990}}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@article{Loos_2018,
|
@article{Loos_2018b,
|
||||||
Author = {P. F. Loos and A. Scemama and A. Blondel and Y. Garniron and M. Caffarel and D. Jacquemin},
|
Author = {P. F. Loos and A. Scemama and A. Blondel and Y. Garniron and M. Caffarel and D. Jacquemin},
|
||||||
Date-Added = {2018-10-24 22:38:52 +0200},
|
Date-Added = {2018-10-24 22:38:52 +0200},
|
||||||
Date-Modified = {2020-04-10 22:19:17 +0200},
|
Date-Modified = {2020-05-19 14:01:04 +0200},
|
||||||
Doi = {10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00406},
|
Doi = {10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00406},
|
||||||
Journal = {J. Chem. Theory Comput.},
|
Journal = {J. Chem. Theory Comput.},
|
||||||
Pages = {4360},
|
Pages = {4360},
|
||||||
|
@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ In other words, memory effects are absent from the xc functional which is assume
|
|||||||
Third and more importantly in the present context, a major issue of
|
Third and more importantly in the present context, a major issue of
|
||||||
TD-DFT actually originates directly from the choice of the (ground-state) xc functional, and more specifically, the possible (not to say likely) substantial variations in the quality of the excitation energies for two different choices of xc functionals.
|
TD-DFT actually originates directly from the choice of the (ground-state) xc functional, and more specifically, the possible (not to say likely) substantial variations in the quality of the excitation energies for two different choices of xc functionals.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Because of its popularity, approximate TD-DFT has been studied in excruciated details by the community, and some researchers have quickly unveiled various theoretical and practical deficiencies.
|
Because of its popularity, approximate TD-DFT has been studied extensively by the community, and some researchers have quickly unveiled various theoretical and practical deficiencies.
|
||||||
For example, TD-DFT has problems with charge-transfer \cite{Tozer_1999,Dreuw_2003,Sobolewski_2003,Dreuw_2004,Maitra_2017} and Rydberg \cite{Tozer_1998,Tozer_2000,Casida_1998,Casida_2000,Tozer_2003} excited states (the excitation energies are usually drastically underestimated) due to the wrong asymptotic behaviour of the semi-local xc functional.
|
For example, TD-DFT has problems with charge-transfer \cite{Tozer_1999,Dreuw_2003,Sobolewski_2003,Dreuw_2004,Maitra_2017} and Rydberg \cite{Tozer_1998,Tozer_2000,Casida_1998,Casida_2000,Tozer_2003} excited states (the excitation energies are usually drastically underestimated) due to the wrong asymptotic behaviour of the semi-local xc functional.
|
||||||
The development of range-separated hybrids provides an effective solution to this problem. \cite{Tawada_2004,Yanai_2004}
|
The development of range-separated hybrids provides an effective solution to this problem. \cite{Tawada_2004,Yanai_2004}
|
||||||
From a practical point of view, the TD-DFT xc kernel is usually considered as static instead of being frequency dependent.
|
From a practical point of view, the TD-DFT xc kernel is usually considered as static instead of being frequency dependent.
|
||||||
@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ linear ensemble energy and, hence, the same value of the excitation energy indep
|
|||||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fig1}
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fig1}
|
||||||
\caption{
|
\caption{
|
||||||
\ce{H2} at equilibrium bond length: deviation from linearity of the ensemble energy $\E{}{\ew{}}$ (in hartree) as a function of $\ew{}$ for various functionals and the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set.
|
\ce{H2} at equilibrium bond length: deviation from linearity of the ensemble energy $\E{}{\ew{}}$ (in hartree) as a function of $\ew{}$ for various functionals and the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set.
|
||||||
See main text for the definition of the various functional's acronyms.
|
See main text for the definition of the various functionals' acronyms.
|
||||||
\label{fig:Ew_H2}
|
\label{fig:Ew_H2}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ linear ensemble energy and, hence, the same value of the excitation energy indep
|
|||||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fig2}
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fig2}
|
||||||
\caption{
|
\caption{
|
||||||
\ce{H2} at equilibrium bond length: error (with respect to FCI) in the excitation energy $\Ex{}{(2)}$ (in eV) associated with the doubly-excited state as a function of $\ew{}$ for various functionals and the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set.
|
\ce{H2} at equilibrium bond length: error (with respect to FCI) in the excitation energy $\Ex{}{(2)}$ (in eV) associated with the doubly-excited state as a function of $\ew{}$ for various functionals and the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set.
|
||||||
See main text for the definition of the various functional's acronyms.
|
See main text for the definition of the various functionals' acronyms.
|
||||||
\label{fig:Om_H2}
|
\label{fig:Om_H2}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ We shall come back to this point later on.
|
|||||||
\subsubsection{Weight-independent correlation functional}
|
\subsubsection{Weight-independent correlation functional}
|
||||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Third, we add up correlation effects via the conventional VWN5 local correlation functional. \cite{Vosko_1980}
|
Third, we include correlation effects via the conventional VWN5 local correlation functional. \cite{Vosko_1980}
|
||||||
For the sake of clarity, the explicit expression of the VWN5 functional is not reported here but it can be found in Ref.~\onlinecite{Vosko_1980}.
|
For the sake of clarity, the explicit expression of the VWN5 functional is not reported here but it can be found in Ref.~\onlinecite{Vosko_1980}.
|
||||||
The combination of the (weight-independent) Slater and VWN5 functionals (SVWN5) yield a highly convex ensemble energy (green curve in Fig.~\ref{fig:Ew_H2}), while the combination of CC-S and VWN5 (CC-SVWN5) exhibit a smaller curvature and improved excitation energies (red curve in Figs.~\ref{fig:Ew_H2} and \ref{fig:Om_H2}), especially at small weights, where the CC-SVWN5 excitation energy is almost spot on.
|
The combination of the (weight-independent) Slater and VWN5 functionals (SVWN5) yield a highly convex ensemble energy (green curve in Fig.~\ref{fig:Ew_H2}), while the combination of CC-S and VWN5 (CC-SVWN5) exhibit a smaller curvature and improved excitation energies (red curve in Figs.~\ref{fig:Ew_H2} and \ref{fig:Om_H2}), especially at small weights, where the CC-SVWN5 excitation energy is almost spot on.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
BIN
Response_Letter/CNRS_logo.pdf
Normal file
BIN
Response_Letter/CNRS_logo.pdf
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
97
Response_Letter/Response_Letter.tex
Normal file
97
Response_Letter/Response_Letter.tex
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
|
|||||||
|
\documentclass[10pt]{letter}
|
||||||
|
\usepackage{UPS_letterhead,xcolor,mhchem,mathpazo,ragged2e,hyperref}
|
||||||
|
\newcommand{\alert}[1]{\textcolor{red}{#1}}
|
||||||
|
\definecolor{darkgreen}{HTML}{009900}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{document}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{letter}%
|
||||||
|
{To the Members of the Faraday Discussions Scientific Committee,}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\opening{Dear Members of the Faraday Discussions Scientific Committee,}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\justifying
|
||||||
|
Please find attached a revised version of the manuscript entitled
|
||||||
|
\begin{quote}
|
||||||
|
\textit{``Weight Dependence of Local Exchange-Correlation Functionals in Ensemble Density-Functional Theory: Double Excitations in Two-Electron Systems''}.
|
||||||
|
\end{quote}
|
||||||
|
We thank the reviewer for his/her constructive comments.
|
||||||
|
Our detailed responses to his/her comments can be found below.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We look forward to hearing from you.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\closing{Sincerely, the authors.}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
%%% REVIEWER 1 %%%
|
||||||
|
\noindent \textbf{\large Authors' answer to Reviewer \#1}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\item
|
||||||
|
{The authors describe the ensemble formulation of DFT or the Gross-Oliveira-Kohn DFT (GOK-DFT) in its Kohn-Sham formulation as a viable method for excited state calculations. They provide a very clear summary of the theory, followed by the main work of the paper which is the investigation of weight-dependent LDA-type xc functionals for eDFT calculations. The provide important insights on small systems with 2 electrons and functionals that are tailored for double excitations in these systems. The manuscript makes an important contribution to the field of DFT and should be accepted for publication. However, I would be grateful if the authors modify the paper slightly to address the following minor points and corrections:}
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
\alert{We thank the reviewer for his/her kind comments.
|
||||||
|
His/her comments are addressed below.}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\item
|
||||||
|
{They should comment about what is needed (or even if it is possible) to develop a weight-dependent universal xc functional for eDFT calculations instead of application-specific functionals as presented in this paper.}
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
\alert{bla bla bla}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\item
|
||||||
|
{In the captions of Figures 1 and 2 replace "functional's" with "functionals'"}
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
\alert{This has been fixed.}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\item
|
||||||
|
{The density $n(r)$ used in equation 21, 9, 10 and more doesn't represent any specific density.
|
||||||
|
In the case of equation 21, we simply present the well-known Dirac-exchange density functional and, by definition of a density functional, we don't have to specify in its formulation to which density it is applied but only that it is a mathematical object applying to any density $n(r)$.
|
||||||
|
Of course, when we will use this functional or any other one in our work we will surely apply it to the ensemble Density $n^w(r)$ and the notation will be carefully modified accordingly. }
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\item
|
||||||
|
{Change "Third, we add up correlation effects" to "Third, we include correlation effects"}
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
\alert{ This has been fixed.}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\item
|
||||||
|
{Change "studied in excruciated details" to "studied extensively"}
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
\alert{ This has been fixed.}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\item
|
||||||
|
{They need to be a bit more consistent with their notation as in equation 9 and elsewhere "$n(r)$" should be the ensemble (weight-dependent) density "$n^w(r)$".
|
||||||
|
I don?t believe they defined "$n(r)$" in the paper so I don?t know which density it represents. }
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
\alert{See our response to 6.}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\item
|
||||||
|
{Even if it sounds trivial, they should explain why the exact xc functional should have linear dependence in the excitation energies as a function of the weight value.}
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
\alert{GOK variational principle states that the expectation value of the ensemble energy admits/possesses a lower bond which is linear with respect to each of the ensemble-weights $w_i$ and is the exact ensemble energy of the studied system (equation 1).
|
||||||
|
Moreover, by construction, one can easily see that the slope of the exact ensemble energy with respect to a specific weight $w_i$ corresponds to the excitation energy of the system defined between the ground state and the ith-excited state associated to this specific weight (equation 4).
|
||||||
|
It is important that the reader keeps in mind that the exact excitation energies are based on pure-state energies and, therefore, do not depend on the weights of the ensemble.
|
||||||
|
In practice, the ensemble energy is rarely w-linear (linear in w ?) because of the use of approximate xc-functionals.
|
||||||
|
Indeed, by inserting the ensemble density in the Hartree interaction functional (equation 9), it introduces spurious quadratic curvature with respect to the weight in the ensemble energy.
|
||||||
|
Some of those terms are responsible of the unphysical phenomenon called ghost-interaction errors.
|
||||||
|
Therefore, the ensemble-Khon-Sham gap obtained at the end of the ensemble-HF-calculation is, somehow, "weight-contaminated" and doesn't possess the right weight-dependence.
|
||||||
|
(two first terms of the right-hand side of equation16)
|
||||||
|
By taking its first derivative with regard to the weight, the xc-functional is expected to compensate those parasite-quadratic terms in order to retrieve the linear behavior of the exact ensemble energy and one can understand that only a weight-dependant xc-functional could do so.
|
||||||
|
At the best of my knowledge, I cannot see any reason why the xc-functional should be w-linear.
|
||||||
|
The important idea is that the linearity must be in the ensemble energy but the main constraint on the xc-functional should be that it is weight-dependant.
|
||||||
|
We emphasize that only the exact ensemble-xc-functional would have the ideal weight-dependency that would make the corresponding ensemble energy reproduce perfectly the linear behavior of the exact ensemble energy and lead to weight-independant excitation energies, that is exact excitation energies.
|
||||||
|
The use of an approximate weight-dependant xc-functional could reduce the ensemble energy curvature and give less weight-dependant excitation energies but it is reasonable to admit that it also could make things worse it the weight-dependency of the functional is poorly chosen.
|
||||||
|
That is why the construction of "good" weight-dependant xc-functionals is a really challenging matter in eDFT.}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\end{letter}
|
||||||
|
\end{document}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
70
Response_Letter/UPS_letterhead.sty
Normal file
70
Response_Letter/UPS_letterhead.sty
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
|
|||||||
|
%ANU etterhead Yves
|
||||||
|
%version 1.0 12/06/08
|
||||||
|
%need to be improved
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\RequirePackage{graphicx}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% DEFINE USER-SPECIFIC MACROS BELOW %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||||
|
\def\Who {Pierre-Fran\c{c}ois Loos}
|
||||||
|
\def\What {Dr}
|
||||||
|
\def\Where {Universit\'e Paul Sabatier}
|
||||||
|
\def\Address {Laboratoire de Chimie et Physique Quantiques}
|
||||||
|
\def\CityZip {Toulouse, France}
|
||||||
|
\def\Email {loos@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr}
|
||||||
|
\def\TEL {+33 5 61 55 73 39}
|
||||||
|
\def\URL {} % NOTE: use $\sim$ for tilde
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% MARGINS %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||||
|
\textwidth 6in
|
||||||
|
\textheight 9.25in
|
||||||
|
\oddsidemargin 0.25in
|
||||||
|
\evensidemargin 0.25in
|
||||||
|
\topmargin -1.50in
|
||||||
|
\longindentation 0.50\textwidth
|
||||||
|
\parindent 5ex
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% ADDRESS MACRO BELOW %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\address{
|
||||||
|
\includegraphics[height=0.7in]{CNRS_logo.pdf} \hspace*{\fill}\includegraphics[height=0.7in]{UPS_logo.pdf}
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
\hrulefill
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
{\small \What~\Who\hspace*{\fill} Telephone:\ \TEL
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
\Where\hspace*{\fill} Email:\ \Email
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
\Address\hspace*{\fill}
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
\CityZip\hspace*{\fill} \URL}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% OTHER MACROS BELOW %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||||
|
%\signature{\What~\Who}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\def\opening#1{\ifx\@empty\fromaddress
|
||||||
|
\thispagestyle{firstpage}
|
||||||
|
\hspace*{\longindendation}\today\par
|
||||||
|
\else \thispagestyle{empty}
|
||||||
|
{\centering\fromaddress \vspace{5\parskip} \\
|
||||||
|
\today\hspace*{\fill}\par}
|
||||||
|
\fi
|
||||||
|
\vspace{3\parskip}
|
||||||
|
{\raggedright \toname \\ \toaddress \par}\vspace{3\parskip}
|
||||||
|
\noindent #1\par\raggedright\parindent 5ex\par
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
%I do not know what does the macro below
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
%\long\def\closing#1{\par\nobreak\vspace{\parskip}
|
||||||
|
%\stopbreaks
|
||||||
|
%\noindent
|
||||||
|
%\ifx\@empty\fromaddress\else
|
||||||
|
%\hspace*{\longindentation}\fi
|
||||||
|
%\parbox{\indentedwidth}{\raggedright
|
||||||
|
%\ignorespaces #1\vskip .65in
|
||||||
|
%\ifx\@empty\fromsig
|
||||||
|
%\else \fromsig \fi\strut}
|
||||||
|
%\vspace*{\fill}
|
||||||
|
% \par}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user