Manu: done (so far) with my corrections
This commit is contained in:
parent
0fd533e816
commit
6854729d76
@ -589,7 +589,10 @@ the excitation energy that drives the
|
|||||||
parameterization of the functional. Regarding the excitation energy, the
|
parameterization of the functional. Regarding the excitation energy, the
|
||||||
parameterized functional does not bring any additional information,
|
parameterized functional does not bring any additional information,
|
||||||
right? Maybe I miss something. Of course it gives ideas about how to
|
right? Maybe I miss something. Of course it gives ideas about how to
|
||||||
construct functionals. Maybe we need to elaborate more on this.}
|
construct functionals. Maybe we need to elaborate more on this. For
|
||||||
|
example, its combination with correlation functionals (as done in the
|
||||||
|
following) is very interesting. It should be introduced as a kind of
|
||||||
|
two-step procedure.}
|
||||||
Doing so, we have found that the present weight-dependent exchange functional (denoted as GIC-S in the following as its main purpose is to correct for the ghost-interaction error)
|
Doing so, we have found that the present weight-dependent exchange functional (denoted as GIC-S in the following as its main purpose is to correct for the ghost-interaction error)
|
||||||
\manu{As mentioned in our previous work, the individual-state Hartree
|
\manu{As mentioned in our previous work, the individual-state Hartree
|
||||||
energies (which have nothing to do with the ghost-interaction) also have a quadratic-in-$\ew{}$ pre-factor. I am not a big fan
|
energies (which have nothing to do with the ghost-interaction) also have a quadratic-in-$\ew{}$ pre-factor. I am not a big fan
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user