From 6854729d763997c43dd3d2724461f1cd652fca89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Fromager Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 20:26:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Manu: done (so far) with my corrections --- Manuscript/FarDFT.tex | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Manuscript/FarDFT.tex b/Manuscript/FarDFT.tex index 3407779..57c24a1 100644 --- a/Manuscript/FarDFT.tex +++ b/Manuscript/FarDFT.tex @@ -589,7 +589,10 @@ the excitation energy that drives the parameterization of the functional. Regarding the excitation energy, the parameterized functional does not bring any additional information, right? Maybe I miss something. Of course it gives ideas about how to -construct functionals. Maybe we need to elaborate more on this.} +construct functionals. Maybe we need to elaborate more on this. For +example, its combination with correlation functionals (as done in the +following) is very interesting. It should be introduced as a kind of +two-step procedure.} Doing so, we have found that the present weight-dependent exchange functional (denoted as GIC-S in the following as its main purpose is to correct for the ghost-interaction error) \manu{As mentioned in our previous work, the individual-state Hartree energies (which have nothing to do with the ghost-interaction) also have a quadratic-in-$\ew{}$ pre-factor. I am not a big fan