From 414f1261973b485a7d92d5f7de08339f28f26b6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Fromager Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 12:47:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Manu: minor correction --- Response_Letter/Response_Letter.tex | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Response_Letter/Response_Letter.tex b/Response_Letter/Response_Letter.tex index c116929..b04c18d 100644 --- a/Response_Letter/Response_Letter.tex +++ b/Response_Letter/Response_Letter.tex @@ -66,7 +66,9 @@ density-driven correlations [62,92-94] (which, by construction, are absent from \\ \alert{The density $n$ used in Eq.~(21), (9), (10) can be any density and does not represent any specific density. In the case of Eq.~(21), we simply present the well-known Dirac-exchange density functional and, by definition of a density functional, does not need to specify in its formulation to which density it is applied but only that it is a mathematical object applying to any density $n(r)$. - Of course, when we will use this functional or any other one in our work we will surely apply it to the ensemble density $n^w(r)$ and the notation will be carefully modified accordingly. } + Of course, when we will use this functional or any other one in +our work we will surely apply it to the {\it minimizing} ensemble density +$n^w(r)$ [see Eqs. (5) and (11)] and the notation will be carefully modified accordingly.} \item {Change "Third, we add up correlation effects" to "Third, we include correlation effects"}