diff --git a/Manuscript/FarDFT.tex b/Manuscript/FarDFT.tex
index 94d74c6..83b41dc 100644
--- a/Manuscript/FarDFT.tex
+++ b/Manuscript/FarDFT.tex
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ The latters are determined by solving the ensemble KS equation
 where $\hHc(\br{}) = -\nabla^2/2  + \vne(\br{})$, and
 \begin{equation}
 	\fdv{\E{\Hxc}{\bw}[\n{}{}]}{\n{}{}(\br{})} 
-	= \fdv{\E{\Ha}{\bw}[\n{}{}]}{\n{}{}(\br{})} + \fdv{\E{\xc}{\bw}[\n{}{}]}{\n{}{}(\br{})}
+	= \fdv{\E{\Ha}{}[\n{}{}]}{\n{}{}(\br{})} + \fdv{\E{\xc}{\bw}[\n{}{}]}{\n{}{}(\br{})}
 \end{equation}
 is the Hxc potential, with
 \begin{subequations}
@@ -670,117 +670,79 @@ Excitation energies (in eV) associated with the lowest double excitation of \ce{
 				&					&	aug-cc-pVTZ		&	28.90			&	27.16			&	27.64	&	27.34	\\
 				&					&	aug-cc-pVQZ		&	28.89			&	27.16			&	27.65	&	27.34	\\
 	\\
-	B			&	LYP				&	aug-mcc-pV8Z\fnm[1]	&					&					&		&		28.42\fnm[2]	\\
-	B3			&	LYP				&	aug-mcc-pV8Z\fnm[1]	&					&					&		&		27.77\fnm[2]	\\
-	HF			&	LYP				&	aug-mcc-pV8Z\fnm[1]	&					&					&		&		29.18\fnm[2]	\\
-	HF			&					&	aug-mcc-pV8Z\fnm[1]	&					&					&		&		28.65\fnm[2]	\\
+	B			&	LYP				&	aug-mcc-pV8Z	&					&					&		&		28.42	\\
+	B3			&	LYP				&	aug-mcc-pV8Z	&					&					&		&		27.77	\\
+	HF			&	LYP				&	aug-mcc-pV8Z	&					&					&		&		29.18	\\
+	HF			&					&	aug-mcc-pV8Z	&					&					&		&		28.65	\\
 	\\
-	HF			&	FCI				&	aug-mcc-pV8Z\fnm[1]	&					&					&		&		28.75\fnm[2]	\\
+	\hline
+	\mc{5}{l}{Accurate (FCI/aug-mcc-pV8Z)\fnm[1]}														&		28.75	\\
 \end{tabular}
 \end{ruledtabular}
-\fnt[1]{Reference \onlinecite{Mielke_2005}.}
-\fnt[2]{Reference \onlinecite{Barca_2018a}.}
+\fnt[1]{Reference \onlinecite{Barca_2018a}.}
 \end{table*}
 %%% %%% %%% %%%
 
 
 %%% TABLE I %%%
-\begin{table*}
+\begin{table}
 \caption{
-Excitation energies (in eV) associated with the lowest double excitation of \ce{H2} with $\RHH = 3.7$ bohr for various methods, combinations of xc functionals, and basis sets.
+Excitation energies (in eV) associated with the lowest double excitation of \ce{H2} with $\RHH = 3.7$ bohr obtained with the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set for various methods and combinations of xc functionals.
 \label{tab:BigTab_H2st}
 }
 \begin{ruledtabular}
-\begin{tabular}{llccccc}
-	\mc{2}{c}{xc functional} 		&					&	\mc{2}{c}{GOK}	\\
-	\cline{1-2}												\cline{4-5}
-	exchange	&	correlation		&	Basis			&	 $\ew{} = 0$	&	$\ew{} = 1/2$	&	LIM		&	MOM		\\
+\begin{tabular}{llcccc}
+	\mc{2}{c}{xc functional} 		&	\mc{2}{c}{GOK}	\\
+	\cline{1-2}							\cline{3-4}
+	exchange	&	correlation		&	 $\ew{} = 0$	&	$\ew{} = 1/2$	&	LIM		&	MOM		\\
 	\hline
-	HF			&					&	aug-cc-pVDZ		&	19.08			&	6.58			&	12.92	&	6.52	\\
-				&					&	aug-cc-pVTZ		&	19.09			&	6.59			&	12.92	&	6.52	\\
-	\\
-	S			&					&	aug-cc-pVDZ		&	5.31			&	5.60			&	5.46	&	5.56	\\
-				&					&	aug-cc-pVTZ		&	5.31			&	5.60			&	5.46	&	5.56	\\
-	\\
-	S			&	VWN5			&	aug-cc-pVDZ		&	5.34			&	5.57			&	5.46	&	5.53	\\
-				&					&	aug-cc-pVTZ		&	5.34			&	5.57			&	5.46	&	5.52	\\
-	\\
-	S			&	eVWN5			&	aug-cc-pVDZ		&	5.53			&	5.76			&	5.56	&	5.72	\\
-				&					&	aug-cc-pVTZ		&	5.53			&	5.76			&	5.56	&	5.72	\\
-				&					&	aug-cc-pVQZ		&					&					&			&		\\
-	\\
-	GIC-S		&					&	aug-cc-pVDZ		&	5.56			&	5.56			&	5.56	&	5.56	\\
-				&					&	aug-cc-pVTZ		&	5.55			&	5.56			&	5.56	&	5.56	\\
-	\\
-	GIC-S		&	VWN5			&	aug-cc-pVDZ		&	5.59			&	5.53			&	5.57	&	5.53	\\
-				&					&	aug-cc-pVTZ		&	5.58			&	5.53			&	5.57	&	5.52	\\
-	\\
-	GIC-S		&	eVWN5			&	aug-cc-pVDZ		&	5.78			&	5.72			&	5.66	&	5.72	\\
-				&					&	aug-cc-pVTZ		&	5.77			&	5.72			&	5.66	&	5.72	\\
-	\\
-	B			&	LYP				&	aug-cc-pVTZ		&					&					&		&		5.28	\\
-	B3			&	LYP				&	aug-cc-pVTZ		&					&					&		&		5.55	\\
-	HF			&	LYP				&	aug-cc-pVTZ		&					&					&		&		6.68	\\
-	\\
-%	HF			&	FCI				&	aug-cc-pVDZ		&					&					&		&		8.78	\\
-%	HF			&	FCI				&	aug-cc-pVTZ		&					&					&		&		8.71	\\
-%	HF			&	FCI				&	aug-cc-pVQZ		&					&					&		&		8.70	\\
-	HF			&	FCI				&	aug-cc-pV5Z		&					&					&		&		8.69	\\
+	HF			&					&	19.09			&	6.59			&	12.92	&	6.52	\\
+	S			&					&	5.31			&	5.60			&	5.46	&	5.56	\\
+	S			&	VWN5			&	5.34			&	5.57			&	5.46	&	5.52	\\
+	S			&	eVWN5			&	5.53			&	5.76			&	5.56	&	5.72	\\
+	GIC-S		&					&	5.55			&	5.56			&	5.56	&	5.56	\\
+	GIC-S		&	VWN5			&	5.58			&	5.53			&	5.57	&	5.52	\\
+	GIC-S		&	eVWN5			&	5.77			&	5.72			&	5.66	&	5.72	\\
+	B			&	LYP				&					&					&			&	5.28	\\
+	B3			&	LYP				&					&					&			&	5.55	\\
+	HF			&	LYP				&					&					&			&	6.68	\\
+	\hline
+	\mc{5}{l}{Accurate (FCI/aug-cc-pV5Z)\fnm[1]}										&	8.69	\\
 \end{tabular}
 \end{ruledtabular}
-\end{table*}
+\fnt[1]{FCI calculations performed with QUANTUM PACKAGE. \cite{QP2}}
+\end{table}
 %%% %%% %%% %%%
 
 
 %%% TABLE I %%%
-\begin{table*}
+\begin{table}
 \caption{
-Excitation energies (in hartree) associated with the lowest double excitation of \ce{He} for various methods, combinations of xc functionals, and basis sets.
+Excitation energies (in hartree) associated with the lowest double excitation of \ce{He} obtained with the d-aug-cc-pVQZ basis set for various methods and combinations of xc functionals.
 \label{tab:BigTab_He}
 }
 \begin{ruledtabular}
-\begin{tabular}{llccccc}
-	\mc{2}{c}{xc functional} 		&					&	\mc{2}{c}{GOK}	\\
-	\cline{1-2}												\cline{4-5}
-	exchange	&	correlation		&	Basis			&	 $\ew{} = 0$	&	$\ew{} = 1/2$	&	LIM		&	MOM		\\
+\begin{tabular}{llcccc}
+	\mc{2}{c}{xc functional} 			&	\mc{2}{c}{GOK}	\\
+	\cline{1-2}												\cline{3-4}
+	exchange	&	correlation			&	 $\ew{} = 0$	&	$\ew{} = 1/2$	&	LIM		&	MOM		\\
 	\hline
-	HF			&					&	d-aug-cc-pVDZ	&	1.897			&	2.209			&	2.078	&	2.143	\\
-				&					&	d-aug-cc-pVTZ	&	1.874			&	2.213			&	2.080	&	2.143	\\
-				&					&	d-aug-cc-pVQZ	&	1.874			&	2.212			&	2.080	&	2.142	\\
-	\\
-	S			&					&	d-aug-cc-pVDZ	&	1.075			&	2.055			&	1.546	&	2.030	\\
-				&					&	d-aug-cc-pVTZ	&	1.062			&	2.057			&	1.547	&	2.031	\\
-				&					&	d-aug-cc-pVQZ	&	1.062			&	2.056			&	1.547	&	2.030	\\
-	\\
-	S			&	VWN5			&	d-aug-cc-pVDZ	&	1.172			&	2.102			&	1.612	&		\\
-				&					&	d-aug-cc-pVTZ	&	1.163			&				&		&		\\
-				&					&	d-aug-cc-pVQZ	&				&				&		&		\\
-	\\
-	S			&	eVWN5			&	d-aug-cc-pVDZ	&				&				&		&		\\
-				&					&	d-aug-cc-pVTZ	&				&				&		&		\\
-				&					&	d-aug-cc-pVQZ	&				&				&		&	\\
-	\\
-	GIC-S		&					&	d-aug-cc-pVDZ	&				&				&		&		\\
-				&					&	d-aug-cc-pVTZ	&				&				&		&		\\
-				&					&	d-aug-cc-pVQZ	&				&				&		&		\\
-	\\
-	GIC-S		&	VWN5			&	d-aug-cc-pVDZ	&				&				&		&		\\
-				&					&	d-aug-cc-pVTZ	&				&				&		&		\\
-				&					&	d-aug-cc-pVQZ	&				&				&		&		\\
-	\\
-	GIC-S		&	eVWN5			&	d-aug-cc-pVDZ	&				&				&		&		\\
-				&					&	d-aug-cc-pVTZ	&				&				&		&		\\
-				&					&	d-aug-cc-pVQZ	&				&				&		&		\\
-	\\
-	B			&	LYP				&	d-aug-cc-pVQZ	&					&					&		&			\\
-	B3			&	LYP				&	d-aug-cc-pVQZ	&					&					&		&			\\
-	HF			&	LYP				&	d-aug-cc-pVQZ	&					&					&		&			\\
-	\\
-	\mc{2}{l}{Exact}				&					&					&					&		&	2.126\fnm[1] 		\\
+	HF			&						&	1.874			&	2.212			&	2.080	&	2.142	\\
+	S			&						&	1.062			&	2.056			&	1.547	&	2.030	\\
+	S			&	VWN5				&	1.163			&	2.104			&	1.612	&	2.079	\\
+	S			&	eVWN5				&	1.174			&	2.108			&	1.615	&	2.083	\\
+	GIC-S		&						&	1.996			&	2.044			&	1.988	&	2.030	\\
+	GIC-S		&	VWN5				&	2.107			&	2.097			&	2.060	&	2.079	\\
+	GIC-S		&	eVWN5				&	2.118			&	2.100			&	2.063	&	2.083	\\
+	B			&	LYP					&					&					&			&	2.147	\\
+	B3			&	LYP					&					&					&			&	2.150	\\
+	HF			&	LYP					&					&					&			&	2.171	\\
+	\hline
+	\mc{5}{l}{Exact (explicitly-correlated method)\fnm[1] }									&	2.126	\\
 \end{tabular}
 \end{ruledtabular}
-\fnt[1]{Reference \onlinecite{Burges_1995}}
-\end{table*}
+\fnt[1]{Reference \onlinecite{Burges_1995}.}
+\end{table}
 
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 %%% CONCLUSION %%%